1. The single period in the entirety of high school where I learnt the most was the day I got my accounting exam back. I spent the next hour arguing with my teacher over the answers to the questions that I got wrong (it was also the first time all year that I looked at our textbook). I'm not too surprised that the only time I've gotten above a 90 so far in university was on the midterm for intro to financial accounting, a mark I achieved without ever attending class or studying. Basic accounting is almost permanently engrained into my brain simply because of the level of comprehension required to be able to argue with a teacher over the answer to a particular multiple choice question (it was a fully multiple choice exam) is far higher then the one required to answer a question.
While I'm not saying let students argue for marks (though I would strongly support that as well), my argument here is simply for the learning experience; If you do surprisingly poorly on a test or exam, it may not always be clear what your mistake(s) were, and by refusing to let students looked at marked exams/tests you are depriving them of what I consider to be the most valuable learning opportunity: learning from ones mistakes.
2. Some students like to use their midterms to study for exams, I don't cause I only study for classes that I'm failing.
3. Today, something happened that increased my passion for this argument. A couple of weeks ago we had a midterm that I thought went particularly well, however when the result went up on our online gradebook, I got a 28. Given that I'm failing 2/4 classes this semester and am already on academic probation, I decided to ask the prof where I went wrong at the end of class last Friday, to which the prof said come see me during office hours. Meeting with the prof today, it turned out I got an 82 and the prof entered my grade into the computer wrong.
This is the second time this year I have been wrongfully failed and when confronting the prof/TA they realised it was a mistake. To date there have been 4 different midterms and exams that I have failed (not counting the above one). Is it possible that these aren't the only two instances where a prof fucking has resulted in a wrongful failure on my part? I have no way of knowing. By forcing profs to give results back, it decreases the chances of human error on the part of whomever marks the test/exam negatively impacting the grade of the student.
So above is my argument for why I want to be given my results back, is there any good reason people have for why profs are justified in depriving us at looking at our results?