You don't care that they are blocking the ambulance from saving lives?

Can I report leon for spam because he makes too many threads and they all irritate me? ##CALLMODS

Wow, what a bunch of jerks. It's one thing to peacefully protest, but it's another to block an ambulance. That is not only a crime, but very dangerous.

There is a real authoritarian/tyrannical streak emerging with these protesters.

@leon, let's assume that footage actually prooves "they are blocking the ambulance from saving lives" (*intentionally*) much more than usual traffic or any other meeting of any kind do.

Ok, that's wrong, that's terrible. So you have ¿10? stupids that didn't understand they were doin a wrong thing. They happened to be anti-trump guys

SOOOOOO?

Maybe you wanna conclude that *ALL* anti-trump guys are like those 10?

yeah, a lot of these paid agitators are really disruptive to society and ordinary people.

thanks ND for keep adding claims with no back up at all

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/13/moveonorg-raising-funds-from-trump-protests-warns-/

the email read. “And to keep it going, we’re counting on you to donate whatever you can to cover the costs of everything involved — the organizers, signs, online recruitment ads, training, and more.”

Keyword: Cover the costs of everything involved -the organizers.

Please do your own research principians. It's not hard. It's spattered all over the internet.

These threads are turning into wack-a-moles everytime you mute one or it loses popularity another misogyny ridden hate filled idiot pro rape thread pops up in its place.

@principians The other protesters could easily have stopped them, and silence is consent. And this roadblocking is hardly the exception:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/19/politics/donald-trump-arizona-joe-arpaio/

So that I get articles like that and still get no back up at all to the claim that they're paying agitators? No, thanks

lol, brainbomb. I'm going to assume that's sarcasm.

Yeah, it clearly states in the article that they are paying organizers to go to trump rallies to disrupt them. That is the definition of a paid agitator.

It just does not say that.

@leon,
"The other protesters could easily have stopped them"
You don't know what you're saying

And I don't see any ambulance in your second example

principians, ND gave you the exact quote. If you are going to act blind, there is nothing we can do.

Wow

sorry if I'm not 20/20, but I'm still trying to see where that quote says they are "paying organizers to go to trump rallies to disrupt them"

"You don't know what you're saying"
Making unfounded statements doesn't help make your case.

"And I don't see any ambulance in your second example"
The second example was in response to you saying that it was just 10 protesters (there were more than 10 in the video). The Arizona protests caused jams for miles. Besides the obvious inconvenience from their disruption of traffic, how do you know there weren't people in dire need of medical help who got stuck?

Additionally, Trump protesters seem to have an obsession with the middle finger. Trump supporters seem far more civil.

"Making unfounded statements doesn't help make your case."
Great you note that, cos it fits perfectly with you original claim that "The other protesters could easily have stopped them"

"Additionally, Trump protesters seem to have an obsession with the middle finger."
Oh no! sooo disgusitng!!!! (yes it's sarcasm)

I never agreed to the fact that protesting was bad, I only agreed to the fact that stopping ambulances was bad, and, well, have you heard about sirens?

How do you argue with someone who doesn't read the article or search other articles out about this issue?

ND, I read the entired article and didn't find your claim that they are "paying organizers to go to trump rallies to disrupt them" That's not what that last paragraph says.

"Great you note that, cos it fits perfectly with you original claim that "The other protesters could easily have stopped them""

When you're fighting under the same banner, silence=consent.

""Additionally, Trump protesters seem to have an obsession with the middle finger."
Oh no! sooo disgusitng!!!! (yes it's sarcasm)

I never agreed to the fact that protesting was bad, I only agreed to the fact that stopping ambulances was bad, and, well, have you heard about sirens?"

That wasn't my response to the lack of an ambulance in the second source. You're being selectively blind.

Yes the article is about how these people (who disrupted Trump rallies) are paying for the training, costs, and organizers to continue to disrupt trump rallies by shutting down roads and other public infrastructure like leon1122 mentioned at the start of the thread.

I provided you with the quote in this thread which clearly shows they are paying for the organizers, costs, and training. Additionally, the article is about how this organization (moveon.org) is fundraising off their successful disruption of a trump rally in Chicago. Their disruption, by the way, stopped Trump from speaking to 20,000 people. Through disruption and fear tactics they shut down a rally and all of those people (including Trump)'s right to the freedom of assembly and speech guaranteed under the 1st amendment was shut down.

Anytime someone celebrates the suffocation of another person's rights under the bill of rights is a time when we, the public, should be concerned.

"When you're fighting under the same banner, silence=consent."

Silence just means I don't wanna engage on absurd arguments about any single absurd point you make.

Sorry if I missed your point at all.

Nothing I have said is absurd. Only your continued refusal to see anything you can't refute is absurd.

@ND
The article is a manipulating peace that itself quotes the stated objectives of moveon.org, but the organization itself does not ask (at least I can't find that in the article you provided) to go to the trump rallies to disrupt them. What they claim, and let's see if you can grasp the difference, is that they'll organize NONVIOLENT portests

peace -> piece

@leon
What I do is to refuse to accept anything you can't prove

yes a nonviolent protest that blocks an ambulance and may cost someone their life due to an emergency. That is "nonviolent" /sarcasm /end.