The last process time was over 12 minutes ago (at 07:21 PM UTC); the server is not processing games until the cause is found and games are given extra time.
Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Start a new discussion in the public forum
Post a new thread
If your post relates to a particular game please include the URL or ID#
of the game.
We get a lot of feature requests. If your feature request isn't already on our issue tracker,
then the best place to ask is the forum. This will help us gauge support for your ideas, before we add it to the todo list.
If you are posting a question please check the FAQ before posting.
If your message is long you may need to write a summary message, and add the full message as a reply.
"Just a day after he had shot two teenagers dead in his home, Byron Smith spoke with calm precision and polite cooperation as he explained to a sheriff’s sergeant that fear and a series of thefts drove him to fire the fatal shots..." http://www.startribune.com/local/256112661.html
Would that suggest/mean a high blood pressure? If so, does that mean that if I can temporarily see my veins, I temporarily have a high blood pressure?
I might be closing in on something I've been trying to figure out for quite a while here, so I'm just checking seemingly obvious stuff as well to be thorough.
Building in a home supply centre belonging to another power
I have a rules query: say I'm playing France, and I want to build in Paris. Paris is unoccupied by any unit, but coloured Purple, because Russia occupied it previously and no one has yet re-occupied it. Can I build in Paris or not?
Obvious dark satire of the 1917 Revolution and Stalinist Russia, but then Orwell also makes a point of making monetary exchanges on the part of the pigs and human beings a major cause of their corruption and cruelty towards the other animals...
"Somehow it seemed as though the farm had grown richer without making the animals themselves any richer — except, of course, for the pigs and the dogs."
The more money and affluence they get, the more they want, until Orwell's final sentence--
"The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which."
What's more, Orwell himself identified as a Democratic Socialist...
So he's hardly the kind of guy who's ideology would get him invited on to guest sit for Alex Jones or Rush Limbaugh.
It's both, but it's not one. The point of the story is that she excluded the anti-communist ideas and only mentioned the anti-capitalist ideas because it's MSNBC, and as much as I hate Fox News, MSNBC is getting closer and closer to them as time goes by.
You know Jon Stewart is replacing Letterman, right? Proof positive The Daily Show was *not* an actual news program, but entertainment for the libtard masses.
Colbert is replacing Letterman, not Stewart, and nobody ever claimed that Stewart doesn't have clear leanings. He makes good points and he's funny, and that's all there really is to it.
lol draug i will say this for stewart - he always maintained he was not a news program, but a comedy show. some with colbert, who is the real replacement, as ghug says.
but yes it is entertainment for the libtard masses. "jon stewart democrats" are the most annoying breed of leftist. especially because they think they are worldly for watching jon stewart, lmao.
that being said, one of stewart's oldest jokes is that his comedy show is more accurate than fox's news shows. he's right on that count, and his taunts ring true.
but i don't really watch any of those shows, or any shows for that matter, so i don't really know.
did you guys know they already replaced Leno? lol i thought that was going to happen next year or something
On the Daily Show? Colbert has had his own show for years, dude. Check your facts before making vague claims that, while technically true, mean next to nothing.
Draug, it's not a "libjard [sic I guess?] agenda," it's a comedy show with clearly leftist leanings. I don't watch Stewart that often, but when I do it's because he's funny, not because I'm trying to get the news. And the guy does make plenty of valid points, you just have to keep in mind that there's a clear and publicly acknowledged bias.
If your going to [sic] a typo, at least have the courtesy of properly quoting it. I substituted a j for an I, not a t. :-)
I know it is an admitted bias, but the libtards here seem to want to refer to his show as a news show and give it a legitimacy that the show itself doesn't claim.
No, when liberals talk about its legitimacy, it's almost always along the lines of "isn't it sad that Fox News is on par with The Daily Show?" It's not a claim of legitimacy, it's pointing out other illegitimacy. The show runs on Comedy Central for God's sake.
And I really have no defense for my improper [sic]ing, except that you were using the word "libtard," which makes you sound like, well, krellin. You're better than krellin. Come on.
Continental battle of north America, south America, antartica, oz, vs the rest, that means http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=140870 joinable as a two team game, (Arg, Bra, Fro, OZ, South, USA, West Canada, Que vs the other big mass of continents)
)
The search for understanding?
)
)
)
)