^I'm not sexually, not really...
I love to talk to them...there are typically more women in my English classes, and more that are passionate about English, and they're often closer to my temperament.
I LOVE women...just in a very mental and intellectual way, I'm not sexual with them...
Or with men, at all, hence my self-styled "asexual" stance.
I love women, if I could afford a girlfriend (well, it's true, need a job for a girlfriend, just as a matter of pride as well as for practicality) I wouldn't at all mind having one...
But I doubt I can get a girlfriend who doesn't care about sex, and is more interested in that sort of "marriage of true minds" I'd love to share with someone.
Women are just far more emotionally and intellectually fascinating and in-tune from my point of view.
But again, no sex is, understandably, not going to fly with most, well, most human beings, sex being one of our primary impulses, one I seem to lack...
So I've the perfect person to be stuck in their Friend Zone, since I have all the intellectual benefits of a friend and ask no sex or intimacy in return.
(Besides, even if there were a girl willing...I'd probably never ask her, any woman that wonderful to consider that would 1. Be so remarkably I'd honestly feel compelled to tell her she could probably do a LOT better, economically and socially and otherwise, and 2. Any girl who was that true a match and could debate with me so well and was so passionate and intellectually honed, likely far smarter than me...I'd never want to lose that sort of person as a friend on a gamble over a relationship when, really, what's gained without sex besides living with each other, which she can surely do with someone who wants that and will give sexual opportunity as well, so, back to 1, a better fish--or at least one who'd suit her better--is likely out there, and the Friend Zone isn't a bad place to be, given what I want and love about women, so I can live with that, and likely will for life.)
:)