Fall 2002 – Plenty to talk about here – great moves, poor moves, defiance and some real painful end results. I’m officially begging for EOGs now – I really want to know what has been promised in some cases.
1. North America: W Can loses a centre, and will lose at least 2 more next year – Quebec just moves into position. First outright criticism – I don’t understand W Can mving Monterrey to NPO. USA had an uncuttable support from Indian Terr, so why not try for California. Worst case there is level pegging, but now you’re doomed.
2. South America: Brazil has 2 centres left, and that’s because of what looks like a miscommunication between USA and Argentina, with the USA supporting the wrong unit in. So Argentina has to delay one build, not 2. One more year and we’ll be down to 3 power blocs on the Americas...
3. Oz/Frozen: Frozen tries a sneaky grab, which SA blocks, but that won’t be for long. I don’t understand Oz’s moves at all – they were bound to fail if Frozen supported himself in – and he did. Even a supported hold would have been a better defence from that set of moves.
4. Africa: Strat called it – South Africa is the loser, as Ghana & Libya realise 3 into Africa doesn’t go. It will be interesting to understand if the Algeria move was planned, or a mini-stab. I *LOVE* the defiant ‘Fuck you’ from Kenya, supporting the Frozen fleet in. This is diplomacy guys, and as long as you have a unit, you are of value. Also interesting is the Indian support of the Libyan move – did Libya ensure that Iraq was unmolested in return for the help?
5. Europe/Middle East: interesting. The predicted assault on Iraq never came, and Europe and Russia are beginning to look a bit stifled. The Europe/Libya alliance seem to have broken down somewhat, and an opportunity may have been missed. Europe could have taken Iraq without any help at all. Pac Russia out-smarts Russia, but swapping centres back and forth and re-building destroyed units doesn’t help either. Decisive intervention is needed.
6. Asia: A truly awful day to be Indian. From 7 centres a year ago to 3. However, China has done you up like a kipper – obviously promising to move out from Bombay, and support the recapture of Afghanistan . India’s existence now looks short and unpleasant. The Pac Russian fleet moving out from Japan suggests another 2 deciding the third is not needed. Where and what Pac Russia builds will tell us all a lot about that relationship. China has 3 builds. 3, count em!
1. Atlantic: The Ghanaian navy still dominates the East Atlantic. The west has gotten emptier, and it’ll be interesting to see if Brazil decides to keep his fleet.
2. Pacific: Still no strong claim being staked, although the Pac Russian are beginning to live up to their name. The lonely W Can fleet will be lonlier still come the builds, I expect.
3. Indian: This is beginning to look like a Frozen lake. Now the Indian navy is compromised by disband requirements, the interaction between Libya, Frozen and China is going to be fun to watch. Poor old Oz is going to slowly fade from view now I think.
4. Northern: Quiet, just some moving into position, and good use of the support from Pac Russia. The sheer size of some of these Sea zones, and the number of points of contact, mean that fleets are always a danger
5. Southern: Very quiet. Too quiet. Nothing to see here. Move along.
So, 2 years in, we’ll have our first elimination (Kenya), and 6 lame ducks (South Africa, Brazil, W Can, Oz, India, Near East). 10 runners left. Alliances swapping all over the place, and a fantastically executed stab. Roll on 2003!