@Jamie - Did I say anything to suggest that the police should be done away with and replaced with a private force? I didn't say that at all...but you, along with Putin, are delusional enough to think that your union-run public police force has a personal interst in solving *your* crime, then you are ridiculous. Oh sure, they may care about a "big picture" number...but you personally? They don't give a shit about *you*, personally.
And if you are going to pretend that your wealth, or lack of wealth, makes a difference in your safety, you are again as delusional as Putin -- you know Putin, that fake-ass down-for-the-fight communist that lives in his safe-as-can-be mostly-white suburban apartment while pretending he shacks up in the ghetto and hangs out with the ghetto gangs.....you really going to lump yourself in with Putin in this discussion?
The poor have protection from crime exactly the same as anyone esle -- that is, when crime occurs, they can either defend themselves in the moment if they are there, or they can call the cops to clean up the mess afterwards. There is no difference in that based upon your finances.
What the poor can do differently is report crime better. The poor can do a better job of telling the police what they saw when crime occurs, instead of having an entire community that tends to be stricken with blindness every time a house gets robbed or a neighbor gets gunned down.
Community is a part of effective crime prevention - and sitting on your ass, failing to report what you know, etc, is contributing to crime, and the poor communities seem much more likely to fail to report.