Chewie, I don't think the facts are on your side of this argument. For one thing, the U.S. has such a disparity of income compared to Europe that we have many more people without medical care or a living wage, for example.
Here's a link to and an excerpt from a year-old Reuters article (Yes, it's European, so there might be a bias, but take a look.): "The relative rankings of countries tend to be defined by gross domestic product per capita but Hill points out that this might not be the best yardstick because it does not differentiate between transactions that add to the well-being of a country and those that diminish it. A dollar spent on sending a teenager to prison adds as much to GDP as a dollar spent on sending him to college.
On a long list of quality-of-life indexes that measure things beyond the GDP yardstick — from income inequality and access to health care to life expectancy, infant mortality and poverty levels — the United States does not rank near the top.
So where is the best place to live? For the past 30 years, a U.S.-based magazine, International Living, has compiled a quality-of-life index based on cost of living, culture and leisure, economy, environment, freedom, health, infrastructure, safety and climate. France tops the list for the fifth year running. The United States comes in 7th." http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2010/02/12/who-wins-in-u-s-vs-europe-contest/