S10: Another army build by ENG is of course correct, as well as the army to head north and the fleet to head south by Turkey. Funny enough Italy doesn't have to disband from losing TUN due to the situation of more SC than units due to no home supply centers. However it's still not obvious how ENG plans to solo (the trade off for the defensive power of corner powers). He won't actually get into or keep WAR, and is too far from TUN. It's not impossible, but it's looking much more likely as a three-way draw between E/A/T. Although T might get too greedy and let Austria throw the game still. If, for example, AUS wants to give ENG ROM or VIE or VEN, not much anyone can do about it.
A10: NOW THIS IS A GAME OF DIPLOMACY! AUS finally heads west to deal with the solo threat while Turkey correctly issues nothing but self-bounces and support holds. England sends a unit north to pressure MOS as correct. What's not necessarily correct or incorrect is his fleet play in MAO; moving to WEST MED seems to signal not so much a greater plan as much as a realization that he's nowhere near the critical 18th and a general rush to get close by to them. He'll get a build from MUN, and can use that to build an army in LON and then convoy with support to PIC and still ensure that he gets BRE, but it's over in terms of hoping to solo for ENG. Too many fleets too :/ . Not sure what TYRR-ION was for. Chances of the three-way E/T/A draw (or even earlier if England gets bored with eliminating I/F) is almost certain.
Oh hey, France is back. Not that it matters. And frankly if I was anyone on the board, I wouldn't draw until he's eliminated. Don't CD. Certainly don't CD and then try to get back in on the draw...
W10: I'm no longer trying to interpret Italy's play. He's probably Strauss? Inscrutable is a nice way of putting it, inexplicable is another. Because AUS owns BOH, and both A and T have plenty of armies, they can shore up the Right and Middle of the board no problem. It's if England can get enough Fleets/Armies to pressure both TUN and ROME because right now GOL/MAR/PIE/TUSC are completely undefended. This game's not dead yet. Turkey needs to send even more fleets that way, but Italy has a way to sabotage him with a move to Smyrna which at the very least will heavily delay Turkey. If I was Italy, I would totally do it. If I"m not in the draw, I'm doing everything I can do let someone solo. But then again, I've been told, by many people, with not the nicest of tone, that I throw to a solo way too easily....
S11: Another Army build. This one I actually think is incorrect. ENG should have build another fleet in LON and gone MAO-NAF, with west med support, letting him move EC-MAO; LON-EC. This way he threatens TUN and can support himself into MAO with either one anyway later. The mainland is not his problem for soloing, the Tunis dot is. If anything this means he's trying to build a stalemate line more than he's trying to solo, which isn't unrespectable. WILL ITALY MOVE SMYRNA?! WILL TURKEY USE PRECIOUS RESOURCES TO DEFEND AGAINST IT?! TUNE IN NEXT TIME IN 60 SECONDS TO FIND OUT!!!
A11: Man, I promised I wouldn't try to understand Italy. Deep breaths. Deep breaths. Nothing much to say here, AUS and TUR playing the stalemate line properly, England also setting up for a stalemate mostly. Any other commentary involves trying to figure out why Italy did things or what Italy would do, and I can't even. I just can't even.
W11: ENG gets BRE and MAR, but it's just clean up for the three-way at this point.
S12: Shoulda gone for Smyrna Italy :/ That's all I'm saying. Seems like correct builds from ENG, he is now certain of 17, and while he may try some WEM-TYRR shenanigans for the 18th, it's more likely we will see MAR s WESTMED-SPA, BRE-MAO deal instead, although ENG has to watch out for the two strength attack on MAR if AUS/TUR want to coordinate it. His insistence on owning PRU is a bit weird, it's like he is honestly trying to get to LIV/MOS/WAR?! But I don't think it'll work. Especially if BOH supports SIL, it can't. Turkey might want to fall back LIV-MOS, MOS-UKR/SEV; as there is a chance that ENG successfully disbands LIV h then ENG can get MOS for certain.
A12: Interestingly enough if A/T are unrelenting ENG might have too many fleets and not enough armies to take PAR without giving something up, but because France resigned (again) it'll still be a three way draw. MAO moves NAF to threaten a solo, or just goes straight to SPA with MAO support for the draw. And he did not play PRU/LIV correctly, if there was a way at all. With the forced disband in PRU it's game over in the northern front; possibly MAO-POR, IRS-MAO now that Italy has NMR'd and will CD.
Straight insult to the rest of the board to save a forced disband as the only player requiring orders in the retreat phase. not cool homie. You didn't work fast or efficiently enough, or spooked the board too much, to get the solo now build a bridge and get over it son.
There's a line of play of PIE s GOL-MAR, GOL-MAR, TYRO-MUN, BOH/SIL s TYRO-MUN, PRU-BER where ENG loses a center, but it's a lot of coordination and it's not clear he can't take it back of that committing both PRU and SIL to the attack doesn't compromise WAR (most probably not). The point is that ENG needs an Army in KIE to make a true stalemate line in the middle.
W12: Yep there's the POR/MAO moves from ENG, the triple attack by A/T, which COULD HAVE WORKED if they understood how to attack MAR, they shouldn't be scared of giving up GOL IMO because MAR would be a forced disband so it's actually safer as ENG would have one fleet not two in the med, and Italy is no longer fucking up Turkey's fleets so he can come over and ensure things. There's a non-trivial chance that Italy taking SMY would have let ENG solo, which is pretty funny and a reminder to all you gunboat/diplomacy players that throwing the game when you know, or when someone threatens, to eliminate you in a WTA game is a viable strategy. Instead, he's going to be eliminated anyways, and watch A and T still get a third of the points, and piss everyone off by constantly NMR'ing for no reason.
S13: Another fleet? Innnnnnnn EDI? OK? If STP attacks MOS, he'll bounce with LIV and LIV won't be disbanded because BALT can only attack with one strength. And Turkey has his last army over in RUM rushing to the location too, so it has to be this turn or not at all, and it can't be done this turn. So I'm not sure what ENG is thinking there. Otherwise it's just the slow slog to watch Spain fall and then Paris as HOL moves to KIE and completes the middle stalemate line. Sorry it's not the most exciting to write up, but it's a deterministic game with stalemate lines! So....
A13: I doubt this was planned but GOL moving to WEM means that BUR can be used to take PAR risk-free and finally end this game. TUN s h WEM, ION-TYRR, GRE-ION, and TYRR-GOL ends the game.
W13: aaaaaaaaaaaand there we go. Three players left. England *could* try and hope that because it's gunboat A and T will not communicate well enough to keep him from the solo by some weird attack on GOL/TYRR/TUSC, but it almost certainly won't work and would be in tremendously poor form. I mean, at this point, he could force is way to GOL but then the other team could force their way to WEM, and the army in TRI and ROM are free to support PIE and block TUSC.
S14: Maybe England wants to try to disband LIV? He could do it if he has a fleet in GOB, an army in SWE, and convoys to LIV with support from STP, assuming If and only if Turkey attacks STP with LIV and supports from MOS and of course he is supporting STP with BAR. But Turkey has another army that (should0 be going to UKR/SEV to make sure even if that happened it doesn' tmatter anyway, and he could just support hold LIV with MOS/WAR and there's plenty of ways that won't work but I'm trying to figure out how ENG is going to try to do this. Am I missing something in the south? I don't think so. TRI-VEN, ROM to TUSC, and they have it all locked up I believe. Even if MAR goes to GOL and GAS goes to MAR, VEN supports PIE, rome moves to TUSC, TUN supports NAF and ION supports TYRR and it's 100% locked.
This is a friendly reminder that if you find yourself in a stalemated gunboat game, a truly stalemated game where deterministically, 100%, no forward progress can be made and the defenders are correctly support-holding every year for three years in a row, email the mods to force-draw the game. Also, if you're the leader in that position, it's extremely poor taste to keep playing hoping one of them misorders or has to go to work/sleep.
A14: From now on I think I'm done with commentating unless something big happens.
S16: aaaaaaaaaaaand England finally draws.