Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 316 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
jasoncollins (186 D)
13 Jul 09 UTC
PhpDiplomacy rating
Just clarifying, what does the percentage indicate?
7 replies
Open
tilMletokill (100 D)
13 Jul 09 UTC
Public Press game?
10points ppsc
1 reply
Open
djbent (2572 D(S))
12 Jul 09 UTC
WTA game starting Monday?
i've got the paused game blues. anyone up for WTA, 101 pts, 24h phases? i can be flexible on the pts and time, but don't want the phases too long. as usual, looking for folks who will do a lot of talking and make a fun game.
7 replies
Open
idealist (680 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
new game.
http://www.phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=12122
30 bets. 24 hr phase.
5 replies
Open
idealist (680 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
Question for mods
If someone is multi-gaming, are you able to tell just by looking at the network? I mean...I'm seriously getting paranoid that whenver a new player with zero finished game joins my game and seems like an expert already......
7 replies
Open
rlumley (0 DX)
11 Jul 09 UTC
This seems really weird...
Of the 46 games I've finished, one has been won by Italy. I know Italy is considered to be the worst country, but a win percentage of just over two percent seems a bit low...

What about you all? Am I just an anomaly?
30 replies
Open
MrD (100 D)
11 Jul 09 UTC
Help
I just made an account on phpDiplomacy and I've played the game before but not this online, I've looked through all the help stuff but I'm not quite sure how to make a move, can someone explain to me what I do?
9 replies
Open
germ519 (210 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
24hr game 12pt pot CHEAP and good time.
http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=12123
2 replies
Open
Zeno Izen (100 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
cheap slow game-2
http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=12124

I've been busy as hell lately, so I'm only playing very slow games. I had 6 points left to spend and started a 72 hr game with them.
0 replies
Open
wee_alex (1330 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
Mea Culpa
This is in regards to the babysitting I performed for Bunjeeman on the Dip game:
Bunjeeman asked me to 'babysit' his account for a portion of the weekend - he was going to be indisposed for a period of time, and would only be able to check his page infrequently and didn't want to miss a set of orders.
12 replies
Open
Zeno Izen (100 D)
11 Jul 09 UTC
If this is in the FAQ I don't see it...
I've been playing on this server for a while now, and I still don't know what those blue-green dots on the tabs are.
3 replies
Open
Babak (26982 D(B))
12 Jul 09 UTC
Fast Gunboat game: Silent Death (Gunboat - No Press)
http://www.phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=12120

WTA - 30pts - 12 hr deadlines
3 replies
Open
idealist (680 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
Anyone interested in a normal game?
http://www.phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=12122
1 reply
Open
wooooo (926 D)
11 Jul 09 UTC
New Game (not like the others)
details inside
4 replies
Open
maximusdecimus (176 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
multi accounters
Why do certain people still insist on multi accounting? Apart from the basic honor principle, how fulfilling can it be really? A game I'm in now "pandasun" appears to be the same as "silly", and once one of his other MA's had been exposed seems to have started another. I truly enjoy the challenge of this game, and this site is easily better than others. This is now the third game that MA's have affected thte outcome. Help!
2 replies
Open
spyman (424 D(G))
12 Jul 09 UTC
JDip - set up position
Does anyone know if it is possible to set up positions at later stages in the game using JDip? I realize that there is an edit mode but you seem to have to go through the motions of gaining an losing SCs in order to set up advanced positions as the unit count must equal the SC count. Any ideas?
2 replies
Open
Chrispminis (916 D)
04 Jul 09 UTC
New Moderator E-mail
Everyone please take note, the moderators have started up a new shared e-mail account through which we will deal with all mod-related issues.

[email protected]
71 replies
Open
Knights Dawn (100 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
To clear things up!
Hey guys, I just noticed something today while getting pissed at two of my new games. It appears a person named ramblin_fan has joined both games and slipped into CD. Now these are the only two games that he joined and it looks suspicious like I created him. I just want to clear up that I didn't and have nothing to do with him :)
4 replies
Open
Skittler (100 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
Three new GUNBOAT / NO PRESS games
25 points each.
Surrey
Hampshire
Berkshire
0 replies
Open
texasdeluxe (516 D(B))
12 Jul 09 UTC
Triple J's Hottest 100 of all time...
Anyone listening?
1 reply
Open
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
Star Trek XII: What do YOU want?
I am a Trekker (so I knw, weird name I have, huh?) and I saw XI the first day and loved it. A sequel (maybe 2, they're not sure yet) is confirmed.

What do YOU want to see next? I would like.....
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
....well, they can go three ways with this "new-old" crew of "new Kirk" and "new Co." the way I see it.

First, they CAN'T:

-Make the next one not about the new crew, they're under contract and the film as a hit and was great for the franchise: Chris Pine and Zachary Quinot are now Kirk and Spock permanently in the movies from here on out.

-Use time travel as a device again; they just had a BIG time travel story in the last film, so using it again would be stale. This is Trek, not Doctor Who- time travel occasionally, not all the time.

-Use Romulans again. The last two films have had Romulan villians, and neither of the villians were that great.



So, saying what they CAN'T do, the four ways I see them taking this:

-Crossover with another crew; the Old Spock thing worked out great, made the Trekkies (a clear-up: I call fans of Trek Trekkers and the nerds who sit in their basement howling about discrepencies in Enterprise specs or worshipping Shatner Trekkies) and mainstream fans and non-fans alike all happy. Kirk and Spock are almost always the focus of the stories, and they certianly were here; this last film leaned towards Spock, so maybe make the next one Kirk's film and come up with an excuse to bring Shatner-Kirk back......? Or if that doesn't work, TNG got a so-so send off with Trek X. Maybe all three, and you can then have the punchline to the age old joke "so two Kirks and a Picard walk onto a bridge..." ;)

-Keep going with the Vulcan saga. I must say that the plot of the last film wasn't it's strong point, the characters were, by design- this was the into movie, where Trekkers and non-fans alike all see the formation of the storied crew, and the plot's just an excuse for that- sort of like if you were to make a movie about the Beatles coming together and hitting it big, and just threw together a sub-plot to justify it. But one thing in the film that was a HUGE curveball to many, myself included, was Vulcan/most the Vulcan race being destroyed, and no reset button. Was it logical? Not really.... but it DID shock the audience, and most in a good way, it's always good to have that feeling that anything can happen as opposed to "they can't kill him/her, it'll wreck continuity/he/she's a main character." If they want to go for a sort of trilogy here, the Vulcans could be the story arc. What do they do to try and survive? Who stands in their way? How does Spock figure into this (and I mean new Spock mostly.)

-A straight adventure/romance movie. No real villian, not as much action- just Kirk and Crew meeting a new race/entity, some romantic intrigue (Kirk NEEDS a girlfriend this time around, a girl competing with Uhura for Spock's attention might be interesting- or maybe go a more humorous route and give Chekov or Scotty a gal for a change?) the crew boldly going where no one has gone before, and something to impede their path to their goal (maybe even for a bit of an Indiana Jones flavor, Kirk and Crew go looking for some sort of "legendary" space artifact that will be dangerous in the wrong hands...?)

-Klingons. It has been FAR too long since we've had a good old-fashioned Klingon war; the Civil War on TNG in the '90s was 15-20 years ago, the last time they fought the Federation (Enterprise the show does NOT count) was even longer. Spock had the Romulan Nero threatening Vulcan, maybe Kirk has a Klingo adversary threatening Earth? Or maybe the Klingons-Federation are on the edge of war and being puppeted (a bit like ST VI; some new outsider this time, or, if you want the nostalgia factor, Q from TNG or even, dare I scream it, KHHHHHHAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!)


Those are the four ways I can see them taking this; myself, I like the last two ideas best (Indiana Kirk and the Quest for the Galactic Whatever or Khan/Q/New Guy sets up Klingon-Federation war.)

My personal wish list:

+More Kirk-Spock-McCoy moments: We didn't get enough of that trio in this movie; Kirk and Spock were, albeit wonderfully, butting heads, and there wasn't enough room for the Old Country Doctor.

+More Scotty and Chekov: I liked the entire crew, but these guys (and McCoy) nearly stole the show for me. Plus, Chekov's my favorite character. ;)

+Give Sulu some damn lines this time: The poor guy barely got to speak...

+EXTERNAL love interest: Uhura needed to be the love interest in the last movie- there was just no one else that fit well. She was great, but now that Kirk and Spock have cooled their heads, I think it's time she cooled just a bit, and let the millions of intergalactic space women have their shot at Kirk's SpaceBalls. (Bad pun, but you get the point....)

+Badly damaged Enterprise: Maybe it's a wierd wish of mine, but I'd really like to see that ship get a fe good cracks. It seems it's always either in pristine condition, has a few holes or burns where decks have been hit, or is just blown up. We have the CGI- let's have some BIG damage to the ship in a HUGE fire-fight: and have every Trekkie-collector nerd's nightmare happen and see a nacelle snap. ;)

+Klingons: I want them in. We've had enough Romulans, the Borg belong to TNG, and somehow just inventing a new race wouldn't be as cool...

+Keep the humor, but BE CAREFUL: The light feel of the crew was great, one of the biggest reason the last film worked. But the jokes about "old" Trek need to stop in this film: they were GREAT, but keep repeating the same comedy and it gets stale. And the crew is young, and can be more immature than the oldies, but this can't turn into 90210 Trek....



So my ultimate idea: Star Trek XII is Kirk and Crew exploring an unknown reach of space, pick up reading of huge power coming from a planet, Kirk-Spock-McCoy go play Indiana Jones with the love interest girl to try and recover a dangerous artifact before the Klingon adersary does, lest that Klingon use it for evil; meanwhile Scotty and Chekov and Crew give him support from the Enterprise, beam up and down to help him, somone gets critically injured, big battle at the end, Crew wins but ship is too damaged to leave the area where they are- the crew is stranded in space until Star Trek XIII.

Ideas? (And yes, that wa a LOT of geek just coming out, but my knees got SCORCHED at the beach, so I can't much walk, have all the time in the world to be nerdy...) ;)
flashman (2274 D(G))
12 Jul 09 UTC
I want a nice, deep space mystery...

Something original, not an extended remake of a series episode,

and no cross-species love interest. In fact, no love interest at all.

Mind you a truly great villain would go down well.
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
No love interest? Kirk's a sex symbol (Spock too, to a lesser extent) no love interest is like James Bond without a girl......

Doesn't have to be a green alien with Kirk- just a non-Uhura love interest.....

And space mystery would be great- are you thinking like "Space Indiana Jones-type hunt"' like me, or something else......?
Alderian (2425 D(S))
12 Jul 09 UTC
Couple of thoughts. First, no more actors from the old shows/movies. Nemoy was critical to this last one, but now they've got the fresh start, keep it that way.

Second, Klingons. It is time again for them to be the bad guys. Maybe have them patsies to a secret bad guy or something, but I want to see the Enterprise fighting some Bird of Prey and other Klingon ships.

Third, the Vulcans. I don't know what the cannon is on this, but I assume that not every Vulcan lived on Vulcan. I assume that they had spread out across many planets. So they can certainly do something with this, perhaps have the Klingons attacking Vulcan colonies since the Vulcans trying to take advantage of the situation.

So there you go. My ultimate idea, the Klingons are trying to expand into Vulcan space, kicking them while they are down. The Enterprise is sent to try to catch the Klingon raiders and put a stop to it. But then throw in a twist where a human politician is prodding the Klingons into attacking the Vulcans to try and provoke a full war between the Federation and the Klingons so the Federation will finally wipe out the Klingons.
Macavenger (392 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
I must take exception to your definition of "Trekkie" - I may be a nerd who studies Enterprise specs, but I certainly don't howl over their inconsistencies, don't worship Shatner, enjoyed XI for the reasons you outlined here, despise the non-show with the ship they called Enterprise with righteous fury, and have long proudly considered myself a "Trekkie."

I agree that Kirk has to have some kind of love interest in XII. Expecially a younger Kirk as we have here. They might just keep Uhura as the love interest since they are definitely making some tweaks to the characters here and there (I don't recall Uhura being multilingual in the original, at least not alien languages; she certainly didn't know Klingon; I can't recall if Romulan was ever mentioned). An external love interest would definitely be better though.

I'd lean toward preferring the deep space mystery angle, and/or Klingons.

While we're talking about plots we'd like to see, my main disappointment in XI was that they didn't make another TNG movie using the plot that my friend in college (who is the most hardcore Trek fan I've ever met, if not in the whole world) developed after Nemesis. I can't recall all the details but it was pretty awesome. It was titled CoeXIstance to fit in with being the eleventh movie, so sadly that tie in is out now. Since Nemesis ripped off Wrath of Khan, he had a B story of restoring Data's memories to the copy or some such. I think Lore may have been involved with that part somehow, to tie in with the title. The main tie in of the title however, was the A story, which followed up on an incredible unfinished story from the series. As the title implies, it was the "WE SEEK PEACEFUL COEXISTANCE" bit, and if you don't remember the episode I'm talking about, I'll reach through the internet and slap you on behalf of my friend. :P
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
@Alderian:

First idea- I totally agree with you; in a couple movies, maybe then again do it, just because it'd be cool to have the past (Shatner) present (Pine) and future (Stewart) Captains in one movie, or feature another neat character like Data or Q, but for the next couple movies I agree that the new universe needs to be left alone.

Second idea: I said that too. :)

Third idea: Ehhh..... not a bad idea at all, but we just had a lot of Vulcan stuff in the last film; if they went that route it'd be neat, but I'm sort of ready for a fresh adventure for Kirk and Crew.
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
@Macavenger:

-If you're not a Shatner-worshipper or someone who doesn't get their suspenders in a bunch because of little differneces between Enterprises or whatever, than you're not a "bad" Trekkie, the "offensive" term, but a "Trekker" the politically orrect term ;)

And I agree with your plot ideas.

And finally:

Data, after Chekov, is my favorite Trek character (he and Bones are both actually second, but Chekov's first for me by a mile) and I'd LOVE to see him come back somehow. Your friend's idea obviously can't work now, but I'd like some refernece to the old android, maybe Old Spock having "told" new Spock about Data on screen or off, or maybe the crew could bump into Data's creator......

And there's always Q......


But for the next couple movies, they need to steer clear of old Trek and focus on building this new future.
Alderian (2425 D(S))
12 Jul 09 UTC
Regarding the "Vulcan stuff", that would just be the reason the Enterprise was being sent after the Klingons. It wouldn't actually have to spend much time on the "Vulcan stuff" itself. Just a bit of Spock reacting/not-reacting to the Klingons further damaging his people. But mostly Enterprise versus Klingons.


8 replies
akilies (861 D)
11 Jul 09 UTC
Joining to Destroy
Has anyone joined a game because they see someone they don't like for the sole purpose of destroying them or turning everyone in the game against them??
14 replies
Open
reynoldsm (169 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
Thought I would try for a quick game
I have set up a game for 1 hr time limits (small pot) for those who would like to actually finish a game in one sitting.
0 replies
Open
idealist (680 D)
08 Jul 09 UTC
guilt
Don't you feel guilty of stabbing?
I feel really, really, really (cannot emphasize how much) guilty when I stab someone, especially when you are forced to stab because there's no one else to expand on.

84 replies
Open
idealist (680 D)
09 Jul 09 UTC
err.....question
what is the difference between here and facebook version? I know we are not linked and all..but what are everyone's opinions on recruiting them? Won't it make new games easier, because there are more people eager to join?
22 replies
Open
idealist (680 D)
12 Jul 09 UTC
paranonia
Whenever a player with few games (total game (n): n < 5; no finished game) join my game, and he doesn't reply when I talk to him, or when he talks like he played this game for a long time, I start thinking someone is multi-gaming...and I loss the spirit to play. I think it's paranoia.
6 replies
Open
thejoeman (100 D)
11 Jul 09 UTC
Podcasts
Does anybody listen to them, and if yes, what are your favorites?
14 replies
Open
superchunk (4890 D)
11 Jul 09 UTC
Anyone interested in a 1hr phase game?
1rh say 50pts? ppsc?
6 replies
Open
Thucydides (864 D(B))
11 Jul 09 UTC
I'm back from Africa, did you miss me??
Actually I'm still in Paris for a plane change but yeah...
What happened here the last month?
10 replies
Open
Pete U (293 D)
10 Jul 09 UTC
Music for Diplomacy
See inside
35 replies
Open
Page 316 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top