Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 1127 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Invictus (240 D)
04 Jan 14 UTC
Remember Syria? All that
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/01/how-obamas-syria-policy-fell-apart-101704.html?hp=l12
1 reply
Open
A_Tin_Can (2234 D)
04 Jan 14 UTC
This game is going to need a new Germany
The game was paused for the xmas break, but one of the players never came back to unpause. We're probably going to get a mod to unpause so we can continue - does anyone want the German position? It's not great, but also not over yet.

http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=128576
0 replies
Open
yebellz (729 D(G))
30 Dec 13 UTC
(+1)
The Italian Game
Wanted to start a discussion on Italian gunboat strategy. See inside...
28 replies
Open
ssorenn (0 DX)
02 Jan 14 UTC
Meta-gaming
Can someone please explain exactly what meta-gaming is. So that the older players like me will understand. Sometimes I'm involved in a game and two countries act very peculiar.
Mayonaisepot (471 D)
02 Jan 14 UTC
Rulebook:
"No Meta-gaming
You can't make alliances for reasons outside a game, such as because you are friends, relatives or in return for a favour in another game. This is known as metagaming and is against the rules because it gives an unfair advantage to those involved. If you are worried that you can't stab someone because you want to stay friends, then that's fair enough but you can't join a game with them."
Jamiet99uk (873 D)
02 Jan 14 UTC
Meta-gaming refers to doing something or making a decision in a game, based primarily or entirely on factors *outside* of the game. Many kinds of meta-gaming are considered against the rules, although this is not always the case and sometimes you need to use common sense. There are many possible ways to meta-game. Most of these are considered bad form. Some of them are grounds for complaint and could lead to punishment from the mods.

Examples of meta-gaming that would be seriously frowned upon include:

- Allying with someone in a game because they are your friend in real life (this is expressly forbidden in the rules).

- Carrying negotiations from one game into another game, for instance "I will agree to a draw in Game A only if you support my attack on Tunis in Game B" (again this is expressly forbidden)

- Cross-game abuse of the pause function, for instance "Russia has requested a pause in Game A but I don't want to give him one. If you also agree not to hit 'pause' in that game, I'll ally with you in Game B." (see also Rule 5 for abuse of the pause function).

A more nuanced example of meta-gaming that might be more difficult for the mods to impose sanctions on, but would still be very poor sport:

- Realising that a given player lives in a different time-zone from everyone else in a particular game, and timing your messages to him so that he will be unlikely to see your message until after the turn has processed, but still allowing you to claim you were doing your best to communicate with him.
protyasha (190 D)
02 Jan 14 UTC
Yes the time zone thing is very frequently used i believe
Jamiet99uk (873 D)
02 Jan 14 UTC
Also - meta-gaming should not be confused with multi-accounting. Multi-accounting, that is, having more than one account, is completely agains the rules.

Finally, if you suspect anyone of cheating and wish to make a complaint, please DO NOT post the details of your suspicion here. Posting cheating allegations on the forum is also against site rules. What you should do if you want to make a cheating complaint, is email the Moderators at: [email protected]
ssorenn (0 DX)
02 Jan 14 UTC
It is hard to accuse someone of cheating because you would have to know if they had more than one account. I don't have the time or patience to do this. I just enjoy this game and want to keep playing. There should be a button in each game that allows you to leave( and concede your points) if you are unhappy with the situation. ( not just because you might be losing)
ssorenn (0 DX)
02 Jan 14 UTC
I don't care if someone wants to cheat. They have to live with themselves I just don't want to play with them.
2ndWhiteLine (2611 D(B))
02 Jan 14 UTC
See jamie's post for a great definition. The real key here is gaining an unfair advantage over the rest of the board or having some kind of relationship or knowledge of another player(s) that prevents you from acting impartial toward that person(s).

Even if you are playing with a real world friend in a game, even if you are trying to treat them the same as the rest of the board, the fact that a friend is on the board will still subconsciously affect your moves. Working with them will automatically arouse suspicion from the mods, while attacking them out of concern for metagaming accusations will still have an undue influence over your moves.

The bottom line, though, is that there is no way to impartially play with friends on this site. If you do have friends, the best course of action is to play in a password protected private game with only your friends. You are inviting a mod investigation if play any other way.
2ndWhiteLine (2611 D(B))
02 Jan 14 UTC
ssorenn, if you are at all concerned about a situation in any game, email the mods at [email protected]. Do not post about it in the forum, as this violates the cheating accusation rules on this site.

The best way to avoid playing with anybody you are not comfortable with is to create a private game and solicit players on the forum.
Draugnar (0 DX)
02 Jan 14 UTC
@ssorenn - If you suspect it, send the email to the mods. You don't need to investigate or gather evidence. The mods will look into it and they are good at catching it.
ssorenn (0 DX)
02 Jan 14 UTC
I appreciate all the response. I actually am not interested in telling on anyone. I will just walk away from a particular game. I'm in it for the fun win or lose. It's a learning experience.
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
02 Jan 14 UTC
ssorenn,

As 2WL has said, the mods are here to help. If you feel someone may be cheating, just email us. We're happy to look into it and it may prevent other games from being ruined.
2ndWhiteLine (2611 D(B))
02 Jan 14 UTC
(+3)
" I will just walk away from a particular game."

Judging by your terrible resign rate, you clearly have no hesitation about walking away.

Here's a tip, ssorenn. The more you respect the site and the game in which you're playing, the more you will get in return. I can safely say that nobody on this site wants to play with somebody who quits in 20% of their games.
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jan 14 UTC
As has been mentioned, respect the game and your opponents by not quitting. If you suspect trouble, write the mods and they will look into it, but don't kist walk away. You may find that your opponents are just better at reading and anticipating moves and saw something you didn't.
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
03 Jan 14 UTC
"I appreciate all the response. I actually am not interested in telling on anyone. I will just walk away from a particular game. I'm in it for the fun win or lose. It's a learning experience."

This type of reasoning hurts the site in 2 ways. The first way is that by refusing to report people who might be cheating you are putting the responsibility of reporting them onto someone else, which just lets cheaters get away with their cheating. That wrecks games for other site members. The second reason is that walking away from a game ruins the game for everyone else. If I'm playing a game of poker with some friends and I start losing I keep playing. If I just walk away the remaining chips I have get wasted and it throws the game off for my friends, I respect them enough not to do that. There's also a chance that I can make an awesome come from behind win. The number one thing we ask on this site is that members respect one another. So I ask that even if you don't like your position you at least make an effort to finish out the game so you don't ruin other peoples fun. Kestas (the site owner) is currently working on implementing a system that will punish people who leave games, because it's become such a big problem on the site.

Anyways, we always want people to report anyone they suspect might be playing unfairly, if only to do your part in making sure other members don't have their games wrecked by people playing unfairly. I hope that makes sense, and please let me know if you have any questions about why we encourage people to finish games or why we ask you to report people you suspect of cheating. Thanks.

-WebDip Admin
ssorenn (0 DX)
03 Jan 14 UTC
Will just holding armies suffice for you? That way the game continues.
ssorenn (0 DX)
03 Jan 14 UTC
I understand that the site is bigger and in more need then just me,but from my point of view the game becomes ruined (for me) if I think something mischievous is going on. The other problem I have pointing the finger at someone is , what if I'm wrong?
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
That is why you send an email to the mods. All investigations are handled in private and if you are wrong, you will be told there was nothing found against the rules. Think of it this way, what if you were wrong, quit the game, and ruined it for everyone in it? Either was you were wrong. Nothing bad has happened if you play it out and send the mods the email but something bad has happened either way if you just quit. Either you have allowed the cheats to continue cheating and harmed the site or you have ruined a game for six other players for nothing.

I cam say with a measure of confidence that you will *never* be invited into any of the tournaments, leagues, or private game with a reputation you are developing and will forever be playing in public, low point games with the crappiest and most unreliable of players (like yourself).
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
And just issuing all holds is even more. At least when you quit, someone else can take over. Email the mods and play it out or forever be branded with a scarlet Q for quitter.
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jan 14 UTC
Is even worse... Not more...
Jamiet99uk (873 D)
03 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
Draugnar and jmo are right. If you suspect someone of cheating, and your response to that situation is just to abandon the game, that's the worst possible outcome for everyone (except perhaps the cheater).
Mayonaisepot (471 D)
03 Jan 14 UTC
I have this feeling that your suspicions are about me & Austria in this game gameID=132519 ?

Let me assure you that I don't know Austria at all.
2ndWhiteLine (2611 D(B))
03 Jan 14 UTC
mayo, please do not imply or respond to implied cheating accusations on the forum.
2ndWhiteLine (2611 D(B))
03 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
"what if I'm wrong?"

I would say 70-80% of the time you will be wrong. Perhaps even more. While we do have cheaters on the site, especially in low pot games (<100 D) it does occur far less frequently than you or probably most other players imagine.

For an idea of how frequent cheating is, scroll through the active games tab. We currently have 523 ongoing. After you're done with that, sort the section by "highest pot first" and take a look at how many cheaters are in the high pot games who are not named Sargmacher. That should be all the incentive you need to stay in games. The more you win (or draw), the more points you accrue, the better competition you're able to play.

But don't quit.
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jan 14 UTC
I second 2WL's recommendation. Talk nice to the mods and Kestas and keep you stats clean and I bet they'd even clean up your resigns for you so you can get into those higher pot invitationals.
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jan 14 UTC
@Mayo - Beyond what 2WL said, I doubt he was talking about a full press game. More likely some anon-gunboat going on where he thinks cheating is happening.
Jamiet99uk (873 D)
03 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
However - I would just stress the importance of jmo's statement that it is always best to report people who *might* be cheating, if your suspicions are genuine.

If you are wrong about your cheating suspicions 70% of the time, that still means that 30% of the time, you will be helping the Mods to root out cheaters who might otherwise get away with it.

Don't do nothing. And don't quit.


(I also laughed out loud when I read "look at how many cheaters are in the high pot games who are not named Sargmacher" - hehe)
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jan 14 UTC
Of course you could play like I play and win or draw all the low point games only to have your points wiped out in big pot, anon, full press, WTA games. :-)
ssorenn (0 DX)
03 Jan 14 UTC
The resigns I have mostly came from live games that I played when I first started on the site and I have to walk away for a variety of reasons. At 45 and have two kids other responsibilities come first even to the dismay of the site. Also I did not know that these types of records were kept. Lots of people leave a game all the time and I thought it was more the norm than not.
2ndWhiteLine (2611 D(B))
03 Jan 14 UTC
It is absolutely not the norm. When you sign up for live games, always make sure you have enough time to dedicate to an entire game, which typically last 2-3 hours should you make it to the end.
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jan 14 UTC
Only in live games I sit the norm. But come over to the dark side and play day or two phase games. Less commitment at one time required and more conducive to great play with way fewer CDs as well as cheats. They happen, but the cheaters require more effort cause it takes weeks, even months, to play a game out and they usually get caught before the game progresses much farther versus being able to fly under the radar in the fast paced live games.
Draugnar (0 DX)
03 Jan 14 UTC
is it the norm... And 2WL says it isn't even there. I don't know cause I don't usually have 3 hours to dedicate to a live game where I can't walk away. That's why I stopped playing WoW with friends. I couldn't dedicate 2 hours to a dungeon crawl.
mendax (321 D)
03 Jan 14 UTC
(+3)
I've finished 135 games on this site, almost all with low pots. In that, I've been moved to make 2 cheating accusations to the mods (both of which were correct). However, I stayed in the games, with results of a draw and a cancelled game due to cheating. Walking away was never a consideration for me.
ssorenn (0 DX)
04 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
These are things I know now. Not then. I am happy to comply with what is in the best interest of the site and all the fine players I have had the privilege to play with. I know so want it to be more than a game but to me it will always be just a game.
Draugnar (0 DX)
04 Jan 14 UTC
It's not that we view it as more than "just a game" as much as we view the quiter as having had no respect for our *time*.
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
04 Jan 14 UTC
Thanks for your consideration ssorenn, and we're not asking for it to be more then a game, just a game that's played respectfully. Like in tennis or chess, there's just a general "code of conduct" if you will, nothing written in stone, but a set of guidelines that make the game more fun for everyone. Best of luck to you in your future games.


35 replies
dirge (768 D(B))
03 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
Is Webdip skimming/scamming??
Where's my missing point GDI?
17 replies
Open
Ramsu (100 D)
03 Jan 14 UTC
Need a new Texas
gameID=129349
8 SCs, global chat, 3 day phases, still very much in the game.
4 replies
Open
SantaClausowitz (360 D)
03 Jan 14 UTC
Europa universalis IV
Anyone have it? How is this installment
16 replies
Open
ILN (100 D)
03 Jan 14 UTC
Japan's increasing tax burden
http://mises.org/daily/6629/Austrian-Economics-and-Interventionism-in-Japan
9 replies
Open
Orka (785 D)
02 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
A year old
I can't believe it's been a year since I've joined. It's been fast, but I feel like I've been here longer on this site than just a year. I like it here, and I will remain here for a very long time.
So, I want to hear other webdiplomacy members stories of the past and how much has changed.
45 replies
Open
basvanopheusden (2176 D)
02 Jan 14 UTC
Resign votes
It's been suggested often that there should be an option for players to concede their games without going into civil disorder and ruining the game for the others. Here's a mechanism that I think would be elegant, and not very difficult to implement. Suggestions welcome!
5 replies
Open
Mujus (1495 D(B))
03 Jan 14 UTC
Smashing one-liners from the Forum and games.
Post any unusually effective one-liners you have seen here.
2 replies
Open
Ancient Med Map Bug
My game is http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=132706 and I am Rome. I have an army at Tarraconensis and a fleet in the Ligurian Sea, and both are adjacent to Baleares. The army is able to move to Baleares and so is the fleet, but when I go to support one unit in with the other, it does not let me. Specifics are in my reply.
4 replies
Open
ForceIndia98 (100 D)
22 Dec 13 UTC
(+3)
Global Waming
Is it happening? Let the debate begin.
179 replies
Open
Draugnar (0 DX)
31 Dec 13 UTC
(+3)
Happy New Year, Kestas!
I know it became 2014 hours ago for you, but everyone seems to have forgotten that fact. So HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!!!!
30 replies
Open
Gentlemaxwell (110 D)
02 Jan 14 UTC
All armies/fleets look the same?
Hello, I am new to the site. I am having trouble telling different players pieces apart. Is there a way to make the pieces the same color as the players country?
4 replies
Open
kasimax (243 D)
02 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
modern diplomacy gunboat replacement
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=131100

ukraine's gone into cd, relatively good position.
0 replies
Open
Bohonk (1918 D)
02 Jan 14 UTC
TAO
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/the-nsa-uses-powerful-toolbox-in-effort-to-spy-on-global-networks-a-940969.html

I would like a well thought out discussion on this. Take your time responding. What do you think?
1 reply
Open
daniyhungre (100 D)
02 Jan 14 UTC
I wanna get a good 24 hour gunboat game going.
Anyone is welcome to join gameID=132822 . I ask people to ready up though.
0 replies
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
01 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
Comment of the Year
Did we do this yet? Don't believe so...

Just cuz - http://puu.sh/658Ms.png
6 replies
Open
VirtualBob (192 D)
27 Dec 13 UTC
(+1)
This game is a travesty gameID=126952
@anlari -- As Italy you were really a jerk in this game. Have the balls to announce ahead of time that you are going for 34 centers ... don't just string the game out for 20 game years toying with your opponents who are playing by the normal rules. I wish there was a way I could ensure that I never end up in a game with you again.
82 replies
Open
Thucydides (864 D(B))
01 Jan 14 UTC
(+2)
dip awards 2013 (7th annual pitirre awards)
the year is finalizing and the awards has come in so we can get an idea of who's who in 2013.
4 replies
Open
kasimax (243 D)
01 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
gunboat replacement needed
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=130977

we need a replacement for turkey, decent position.
4 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (873 D)
01 Jan 14 UTC
Does anyone know....
.... what bo_sox does for a living?
14 replies
Open
ChaseAero (125 D)
01 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
Need Players
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=132748
0 replies
Open
krellin (80 DX)
27 Dec 13 UTC
Minimum Wage is Too Much
Read on....
165 replies
Open
VirtualBob (192 D)
01 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
Good German Position Available: gameID=130424
0 replies
Open
Draugnar (0 DX)
01 Jan 14 UTC
(+1)
Happy New Year
As above
0 replies
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
31 Dec 13 UTC
(+1)
Good Morning, America!
Here is yet another corrupt cop story for your enjoyment.

http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/30/driver-arrested-for-having-empty-compartment-that-could-store-drugs/
16 replies
Open
steephie22 (182 D(S))
14 Dec 13 UTC
(+1)
How many French speakers do we have here?
I have been and still am taking French for a few years in high school, but it's piss poor. I'm thinking about setting up a French-only game where I can enjoy a little Diplomacy while immersing myself in the language for a few minutes a day.
71 replies
Open
HectorofTroy (266 D)
31 Dec 13 UTC
(+1)
Indonesia
I'm playing a game of World diplomacy and I was wondering if Indonesia was special at all. First time on the big map, it would greatly appreciated if someone helps.
3 replies
Open
Page 1127 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top