@Krellin -
“INstead of dismissing the activity as not interesting, please chime in on these boring topics and let us start to get a read on you...
Are you FOR or AGAINST the day 1 lynch, and WHY?”
I have actually already posted my opinions on a day 1 lynch and WIFOM, and I would rather hunt scum than beat a dead horse, so here is what I already posted:
“Uclabb, did you want me to add my opinion about WIFOM?? Because I dont completely understand it. I think that WIFOM is just a psychological way of saying that you cant know something for sure, specifically someone's motivation for doing something. Obviously you will never know for sure, but it is the degree to which you are sure of something that matters. In true WIFOM cases, it is about 50/50 to whether someone did what was expected of them or not. Like you said, in mafia, those cases rarely exist, and the scum will almost always do what benefits them most. Basically you need to gauge everything as a whole, so the smaller WIFOM instances do not matter enough to make a big deal about.”
“@krellin - a no vote will give us no information. A vote gives us information. If you choose not to vote, then you really dont have any more information on day 2 then you do on day 1. You might have a little extra time to talk about things, but do you really think that we are going to expose the scum by simply talking for an extra 48 hours?? The mafia would love to have a no lynch, because their only chance of dying is a lynch (and I guess SK).”
“a yes vote gives you a 10/14 chance of having the first death a townie. a no vote gives you a 100% chance (minus the chance of a doc save) that the first death is a townie (mafia's kill).”
@ILN - ILN is either just really new, and doesnt know how to play this game, or he is scum. First, he does my least favorite thing, and votes without giving good reasoning:
“I'm with uclabb on this one,
[][] vote krellin
Reason? My *human* instincts.”
Then, when he is pressed to give his reasoning on why he thought that WD and Krellin were suspicious, he comes up with this post:
“Hmm, this thread is really long, so i skimmed over it before posting. I think i missed the part where chaqa dropped the vote. Anyways, I still suspect WD. I might be wrong though, he might as well be a human, which is why i didn't vote for him, just pointed out it was suspicious to vote to lynch chaqa.
Perhaps i'm being naive or something, but there's something about Krellin's post that makes it really suspicious to me.
I'll give a list of what scummy shit krellin did tmw, It's a bit late now. But go and reread his posts, and you'll see what i mean.”
First, he hedges on WD when he says that he suspects WD, but he might be human, and that he isnt really sure. Then he doesnt give reasoning on Krellin, he just directs us to his posts. I realize that he said he doesnt have any time, but he could have just listed off one or two reasons, like “Krellin has suggested bad ideas” or “Krellin has not hunted any scum” or “Krellin was joking around at the beginning” or something simple like that.
Like I said though, he could just be a newbie that is struggling to grasp the game, I know that a lot of my scum read on Maniac last game was because of some of his inexperience.
@ghug - Were you high when you posted your read on me?? I dont know how flowers and perfume are related to my posts at all.