Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 1265 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
The Czech (39951 D(S))
05 Jul 15 UTC
Moderator Please check mail
Sent a msg a while ago.
3 replies
Open
sundaymorning (132 D)
03 Jul 15 UTC
(+2)
Army movements.
Novice player. Just wanted to double check. Can an army move from North africa to Spain? I'm thinking NO but would love confrimation before I set my moves. Thanks!
5 replies
Open
Brankl (231 D)
04 Jul 15 UTC
What if the internet shut down on holidays?
A random 4th of July thought. Why do servers still run on holidays? Pretty much all businesses are closed.
15 replies
Open
Stubie (1817 D)
03 Jul 15 UTC
I work on call. Exiting Gunboat gracefully
How does one exit a gunboat game most gracefully?
Can one find a replacement player to minimize game disruption?
17 replies
Open
ghug (5068 D(B))
05 Jul 15 UTC
ODC Subs
Come one, come all. Prove your worth against players from across the Internet. Up to two 36 hour phase press games, plus more if you win. PM me for more details.
5 replies
Open
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
03 Jul 15 UTC
(+2)
On The Forum
As some of you may know, I have been a strong proponent of a one forum system. After some careful reflection, though, I've decided separate forums are better. I have a proposal that would allow for the separation of topics without the segregation of the community that many fear. I realize this is a sensitive topic, so I would appreciate serious criticism only. I have taken the liberty of making a mock-up of my proposed forum here: http://i.imgur.com/rgcdsO2.png
31 replies
Open
Chaqa (3971 D(B))
01 Jul 15 UTC
(+1)
Mafia X Discussion (not sign up)
.
82 replies
Open
ssorenn (0 DX)
04 Jul 15 UTC
The dead 2.0
Open with 'box rain'
11 replies
Open
Devonian (1005 D)
03 Jul 15 UTC
(+3)
1v1 Ladder tournament open to new players
Practice your tactics in a 1v1 tournament.
Visit the thread here:
http://www.vdiplomacy.com/forum.php?threadID=60990#60990
4 replies
Open
MarquisMark (326 D(G))
04 Jul 15 UTC
Has Diplomacy inspired actual diplomats?
Just curious.
10 replies
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
27 Jun 15 UTC
(+1)
Umpires
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/umpire-andy-fletcher-attempts-to-charge-mound-against-jon-lester-185755930.html

If you are in the "umpires can do no wrong, players are just out of their minds" crowd, have you changed your mind yet? This is everything wrong with umpires in one short clip.
8 replies
Open
ckroberts (3548 D)
05 Jun 15 UTC
(+1)
The Mountain Game 2 has ended
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=159522
150 replies
Open
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
29 Jun 15 UTC
(+1)
3rd of July Live Voice-to-Voice Game!
I have Friday off and nothing to do, so let's play some Diplomacy!
Requirements: Headset/Mic and Teamspeak3 (http://www.teamspeak.com/?page=downloads)
33 replies
Open
orathaic (1009 D(B))
25 Jun 15 UTC
(+1)
Robot labour?
http://www.scottsantens.com/yes-it-really-is-different-this-time-and-humans-already-need-not-apply

And basic income?
55 replies
Open
mendax (321 D)
30 Jun 15 UTC
(+3)
Greek Bailout Fund
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/greek-bailout-fund/x/11225530#/story

I just bought a bottle of wine. What will your contribution be?
92 replies
Open
y2kjbk (4846 D(G))
01 Jul 15 UTC
Move adjudication question
France: A Paris -> Burgundy supported by Marseilles
Germany: A Burgundy -> Paris supported by Picardy
England: A Brest -> Paris supported by Gascony
What happens in Paris?
32 replies
Open
steephie22 (182 D(S))
28 Jun 15 UTC
Director's Cut seems ambiguous to me..
Isn't a movie pretty much always the Director's Cut?
6 replies
Open
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
03 Jul 15 UTC
(+2)
So what's been going on with reddit recently?
One thing after another. Maybe we should send zultar over there to clean things up.
10 replies
Open
2ndWhiteLine (2596 D(B))
01 Jul 15 UTC
In vs. on
See inside.
14 replies
Open
ERAUfan97 (549 D)
01 Jul 15 UTC
start college tomorrow
Anyone got any tips to share with this noob?
49 replies
Open
arborinius (173 D)
10 May 15 UTC
(+5)
Daily MARX
This thread includes selected excerpts from Karl Marx.
58 replies
Open
wjessop (100 DX)
02 Jul 15 UTC
Site problems
The site is suddenly taking a rather long time to load/refresh for me this evening - does anyone know why that might be/any solution?

I'm in a live game right now and so it's not particularly helpful.
3 replies
Open
wjessop (100 DX)
02 Jul 15 UTC
Live replacement 8-center Italy needed
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=163902
10 replies
Open
captainmeme (1723 DMod)
02 Jul 15 UTC
(+2)
A Diplomacy Scenario - Would you take a risk?
http://i.imgur.com/YlTaZEf.png
44 replies
Open
Need Players for quick-phase diplomacy
I'll make the game when I have seven people, but I'd like to know who's up for a game of 15-30 min phases, classic.
0 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
01 Jul 15 UTC
EOG: King of The Hill special variant game
http://imgur.com/a/kS7uu

How did everyone think that went?
13 replies
Open
y2kjbk (4846 D(G))
15 Jun 15 UTC
(+11)
Mafia IX: the Purge of the Jedi
See inside for details
Page 6 of 90
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
OB_Gyn_Kenobi (888 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
"If DeathLlama is voted off and he turns out to be scum, then I don't have to explain my reason to have identified him." -LittleItaly

Here is an excellent example of what I look for in scum tells. This statement seems logical on the surface of it, doesn't it?

1. I think so-and-so is scummy, but I won't say why.
2. So-and-so gets lynched, flips scum.
3. See? So-and-so was scum, I don't need to defend my opinion, I was right.
4. Because I was right, I am town.

That's called "bussing". Scum know who are town and who are scum. Not defending/explaining how you "knew" someone was scum when they eventually flip scum, is scummy.

@LittleItaly: You're trying to cast an accusation at DL, and have reiterated what some others (like ND) have said, not really saying anything that you yourself feel. All along you're posting that you're not actually giving us the full reason you think he's scum.

Exhibit A) "But if DeathLlama is voted off and he turns out to be town, then I am forced to explain myself to everyone. Which I am willing to do so, when I that is the only way to save myself."
Exhibit B) "Unless you want to Lynch me, I don't think we should discuss about why I feel DeathLlama should be scum in much detail."
Exhibit C) "I also feel that if you drive / distract the lynch away from DeathLlama then you must be scum buddies with him, trying to protect him."

THEN! when called out for this handwaving, you play the noob card, and play it hard. That is against OB rule #1, noob or not, scum play is scum play, and trying to pass it off as inexperience is a glaring scum tell. You're new LI, you're not dumb. You understand the game. You know the objective.

##VOTE LittleItaly

So right about now, the whole census of players will come down on me for pointing a finger at the noob, right goldfinger?
LittleItaly (355 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
3. See? So-and-so was scum, I don't need to defend my opinion, I was right.
4. Because I was right, I am town.

If I get a scum hunch right, that doesn't mean that I am 100% town @_@
Are you sure I am the only noob? :p
LittleItaly (355 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
That's called "bussing". Scum know who are town and who are scum. Not defending/explaining how you "knew" someone was scum when they eventually flip scum, is scummy.

Bussing is not something I was aware of, and I think it is weird to do such a sacrifice. Unless it is absolutely unavoidable. Even if I was scum, I wouldn't take advantage of a friend who is going down.
OB_Gyn_Kenobi (888 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
^^to get the reference to goldfinger, see Mafia VII, p. 6-8. threadID=1240217

@LI - Was my explanation unclear? If you are scum, all of your player alignment "hunches" will be 100% right. So no, being correct about a scum hunch does not equate to you being 100% town. Being right about a scum hunch, when you provide almost no reasoning behind the hunch, is actually very very suspicious.

wjessop (100 DX)
16 Jun 15 UTC
@HR: you need to read more closely: I said I can understand why LittleItaly read them as town, I didn't say it was right and I specifically said I had no reads yet either way. Understanding someone's point of view is not the same as agreeing with them.
LittleItaly (355 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
I am not sure how to explain this, but definitely feel DL is the most scummiest to me from the posts that I have read.

I mean, I wouldn't start the day with jokes if I am a serious town player. Wouldn't that account as a distraction tactic by scums?
LittleItaly (355 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
I think you guys are expecting me to put too much thought and reasoning into my votes. I haven't done so till now. My vote has been purely logical and hunch based. And I did explain the logic behind my voting.

What is it that you guys are expecting? I don't think I can compose a well written and articulate reasoning with Mafia technicality on anyone during D1.
OB_Gyn_Kenobi (888 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
"Even if I was scum, I wouldn't take advantage of a friend who is going down."

Just because you would be a bad scum player, does not make you town. I smell something here LI. I think you're working a little too hard at being the dumb new guy.

I started the day with jokes. Am I scum?
DeathLlama8 (514 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
I'm back for another day of scumhunting! This line bothers me -

"I mean, I wouldn't start the day with jokes if I am a serious town player. Wouldn't that account as a distraction tactic by scums?"

Oh, I'm the only one who made jokes now? Reread page one if you think that's true. Why did you choose to single me out?
LittleItaly (355 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
Lol you are being silly OB. I guess I am being silly too. But me being silly on DL lynch is different from you being silly. Idk, I can tell you all the things why I felt DL is scummy. But I think you guys are ready to slam them.

As explained in my introductory post, this is what happens with all my hunches.

Do what ever you want to do OB. I told you want I felt, and if you want more. Then give me an example, like you gave for Bussing.
DeathLlama8 (514 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
Also, pewing is the same thing as shooting. Usually referring to vigshots or gs guns.

RXNTSTCMS

Brankl appears to be doing his best y2k impression - he said "let's hunt some scum!" then proceeded to not hunt any scum. Afk town, or scummy scummy lurker?
LittleItaly (355 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
Okay, I think I will start by quoting your posts DL.
DeathLlama8 (514 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
"But I think you guys are ready to slam them." what does this mean?
OB_Gyn_Kenobi (888 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
I think LI means that any reasons s/he states to accuse DL will be refuted by others. Like we're ready to pounce on anything said regardless of the content or validity of the reason. Not true for me, at least.
LittleItaly (355 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
Listing the approx post number and categorizing them:

Fun:

#1: "FIRST P0ST!"
#3: ##VOTE Tvrocks

Jump on the wagon! Screw "voting people who are actually in this game!"

Questionable Joke: (Distraction Tactic, Scum Budding or Joking)
#2: @TVROCKS - Guak can't be scum!!! They were scum two times in a row!!! Therefore they can't be scum by the Gambler's Paradox!!!!!11!!!11!!!11!!

#5: OMG I'VE BEEN DISCOVERED!

# 6 PLOT TWIST - Flum is /still/ a power role

# 8 I should probably post jokeposting. Have to go now.

# 10 0_o

Spamming: (Unnecessary posts that burden the reader)
#3 ##unvote
#9 *STOP jokeposting. Not post jokeposting. STOP jokeposting.

Useful post:

#4, #12, #13, #14, #15, #18

------

DL did more Scum activity than anyone else, so that is why I voted him.
DeathLlama8 (514 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
Wait how does joking = scum? All of my jokes were confined to the first page and after that I stopped. Everyone else's jokes were confined to the first page and after that they stopped.
LittleItaly (355 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
This is the same tactic every scum used in the last NOC game I was in. They did the same thing.

#Vote so and so

#Unvote because I am a good guy

#Vote so and so again, because the guy did respond.

Everyone asks why they are spamming, and they go. "Oh I was only joking."
DeathLlama8 (514 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
Let's look at my votes, shall we?

TVROCKS: TV isn't in this game.
OB_GYN_KENOBI: Made a joke fos, RETRACTED IT IMMEDIATELY
THDFRANCE: Pressure vote, unvoted once they answered ghug's question

I fail to see how this comes across as scummy, especially since all of my jokes were confined to the first page and I haven't made any since then. I also fail to see how I am different from everyone else that posted jokes on the first page that you HAVEN'T EVEN MENTIONED despite joking = scummy.
LittleItaly (355 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
This is exactly what I said will happen. This is what all mafia do, they take a reason and twist and turn it and say that it is not valid.

My vote is staying, unless someone proves why you are not scummy. Or someone else is more scummy to me than you.
DeathLlama8 (514 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
"This is what all mafia do, they take a reason and twist and turn it and say that it is not valid."

That's a very convenient cop-out when you have a reason that isn't valid. Unless you prove that your reason is valid (by answering my last post), I'm still viewing it as invalid.
Hellenic Riot (1626 D(G))
16 Jun 15 UTC
@wjessop - I know what you said, and I promptly debunked at least two, if not all three of those townreads. And when someone agrees with poor logic, I find them just as faulty as the originator of said logic. If not even more so.
OB_Gyn_Kenobi (888 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
"promptly debunked"

That's a bit of a generous description of what you did, isn't it HR?
Hellenic Riot (1626 D(G))
16 Jun 15 UTC
Are you saying you think Captainmeme is townie for posting a vote tracker, OB? The one on you, perhaps not, but as other people are also agreeing with the "ND tunnelling for the same person you think is scum =/= ND town" line, I'd say 2 out of 3 ain't bad.
wjessop (100 DX)
16 Jun 15 UTC
And still you don't read.

Understanding why someone might think something is *not* agreeing with them.

wjessop (100 DX)
16 Jun 15 UTC
@HR, re your comment:
""Are you saying you think Captainmeme is townie for posting a vote tracker, OB?""

Again, it's you making/insinuating false assertions here, OB did not do any such thing.
OB_Gyn_Kenobi (888 D)
16 Jun 15 UTC
I'm saying you didn't "debunk" anything HR. You're taking credit where none is due.
Hellenic Riot (1626 D(G))
16 Jun 15 UTC
"X is town for Y"
"X does Y every game as either alignment"

is about as close to a debunking as you get.
captainmeme (1723 DMod)
16 Jun 15 UTC
Just a couple of notes on past meta:

There are always a certain number of joke posts on D1, which is why I hate it so much. Since it's roughly the same group of players each time we've exhausted most topics of conversation that can be discussed D1, so what tends to happen is people joke around until one of the jokes borders on something accusable, then someone will accuse that person semi-seriously and hope that the defence/attack on them sparks some real discussion and gives some real information. I find it rarely does until very late in the phase. I'm somewhat disappointed that my attempt to start some real discussion has not really taken off.

Bussing is a pretty bad strategy in general and usually I would say that it's unlikely that mafia would bus, but there's been a fad of it in the past few games after Maniac and Guak managed to pull it off with incredible success.

Making vote trackers is not alignment indicative - WardenDresden used the trust gained from making one of these to hide himself as mafia in I believe M4? Since then it's been mostly me making these trackers, with some occasions where two trackers would be going at once to confirm the reliability of each (this is a very good practice and IMO someone else should start one up this game).

Re: Vigilante shot

@Ghug - Firstly, I do not think that narrowing the pool of suspects is the Vigilante's main purpose. If he is able to shoot an anti-town role (as Thucy did in M1 and tv did in M8), he's been far more useful than he has if he shoots two town lurkers.

Additionally, I do not believe shooting lurkers is even that helpful:
Going from memory, mafia lurkers in past games have been:
M1: y2kjbk
M2: DoubleCapitals (Modkilled), pjmansfield99
M3: pjmansfield99
M4: None
M5: ALEXTREME, tvrocks, y2kjbk
M6: DeathLlama, Chaqa (arguable)
M7: goldfinger (arguable)
M8: y2kjbk

One thing that you'll find in common with all of these players (except DoubleCapitals and DeathLlama) is that they were not noticably lurking on D1. Sure, they weren't posting constantly and accusing people, but they posted enough that they were not tagged as lurkers by most people. I think this is something mafia do - quite often there is at least one lurker, but they will post enough so that they aren't targeted by a lurker-shooting Vig, since the meta on this site is for the Vigilante to shoot a lurker on N1.
I also believe that, over time, enough information comes out of most lurkers to have a decent read on them regardless. It should be noted that despite the lurking of 3 of the 4 mafia members in M5, I managed to pin 2 of the lurkers as mafia and I had the other one down as the Serial Killer. When you have someone who doesn't post at all (DoubleCapitals in M2, DeathLlama in M6), it can be very hard to get an opinion on them, but that's why you apply pressure to them in lynches - you can force them to talk, and then you can get information out of them. Shooting players N1 simply because they are noticably lurking is not helpful to the town at all.

@OB & ND - I think we seriously need to drop this 'Don't talk about PRs at all, ever' attitude that's come up over the past few games. It has a good idea behind it (we need to protect the PR from being discovered through how his actions correlate to his opinion on certain subjects), but it's been taken far too far, to the extent where any conversation about PRs quickly gets shut down. It's literally the only controversial subject we can discuss on D1 now.
Your argument makes sense - the vigilante needs to be aware that some people contributing will be mafia, so he needs to consider the merit of the arguments themselves very carefully, and will certainly need to keep in mind that he may need to provide an opposing opinion to the one he actually has, but it's not worth throwing the conversation topic out completely over that, since it's the best thing we have D1.

@DeathLlama - Why exactly does the Vig being the only town directed kill mean he has to shoot on N1? It's certainly an argument against discussing the issue at all (which OB stated, and I have replied to above), but the fact that it's the only town directed kill supports him saving the shot for when there is a worse ratio of town:mafia, and the mafia are having more impact in the lynches. It also makes his kills very valuable, which also means that he shouldn't be wasting them on people he does not have proper reads on.

@HR, Thd, Wje, Bra - I'd be interested to hear your responses to the points that Ghug, OB and DL made, rather than just responding to my post and dropping the subject. Getting a debate/argument going requires people to be responding to one another and countering each others' arguments.

I'd specifically be interested to hear people's thoughts on OB's point, that we should not discuss the Vigilante shot because it's our only town directed kill. That argument is actually better than the initial one because it doesn't have a chance to compromise our Vig.

Everyone who hasn't responded to my initial post yet, I'd still be interested in hearing your thoughts.

Re: What's actually happened today:

I have said before that I intensely dislike D1 because the joke posts/initial arguments give very little information. However, I'm going to try and analyse it anyhow (1 is strong read, 3 is weak):

DeathLlama - Town 3. I believe mafia members are a lot more careful when posting stuff than town, because they have to try to make themselves appear to be town; townies don't (usually) care about that so they just write whatever comes into their head. DL is being very sporadic with his posting, which looks to me like he is just typing whatever is on his mind.

wjessop: Town 3 for the same reason as above; he's posting in bursts, which suggests writing as he is thinking.

Chaqa: Mafia 3. He always lurks through D1 as mafia, and he's doing this now. I'd like to hear more from you Chaqa - specifically, what you think of the Vigilante discussion.

OB_Gyn: Town 3. While I disagree with him on discussing the Vigilante, I think that his response to the discussion is town-like, attempting to protect the PRs. I think if mafia had a chance to try to affect what the Vig would do, they would take it, not try to shut the discussion down.

ND: Town 3 for the same reason as OB.

Uclabb: Undecided. He lurked like this last game too and was town, so I would not say that's a good reason for him to be mafia. Still, I'd very much appreciate you talking a bit more, Uclabb - specifically, I'd like to hear your response to my argument about vig shots.

LittleItaly: Town 3. Without the ability to take into account meta, analysing D1 is even harder than it already is, but I think I'd put LI as town here. He came in immediately with some townreads with very little reasoning - normally, I'd have this as a scumtell, but it was in a relatively substantial post, so he was evidently thinking about what he was writing. I do not think that a mafia member would post so little evidence for their reads if they are using longer, more noticable posts.


If a player is not on the list above it means I have no read on them, either because they are lurking and I have no meta information to tell me what that might mean, or because they haven't done anything noticable/have done exactly the same thing they do every game.

With that, ##vote Chaqa.
y2kjbk (4846 D(G))
16 Jun 15 UTC
First Official Vote Count, Day 1:

LittleItaly (2): ob_gyn_kenobi, ghug
DeathLlama (2): ND, LittleItaly
thdfrance (2): wjessop, DeathLlama
Chaqa (2): captainmeme, Hellenic Riot
Hellenic Riot (1): chaqa
uclabb (1): uclabb

no vote: thdfrance, guak, yoyoyozo, maniac, brankl

Currently NO ONE is set to be lynched. You have 31 hrs 10 min remaining.

A reminder that after the 24 hour marker, I'll start publicly pestering those that aren't participating enough.
y2kjbk (4846 D(G))
16 Jun 15 UTC
After posting that, I realize I didn't thoroughly check for UNVOTES, so the count might not be perfect.

Page 6 of 90
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

2680 replies
trip (696 D(B))
28 May 15 UTC
Lusthog
4 games: 25pts, 36hr, WTA, Quasi-Anon, HDV
Sign up inside...
58 replies
Open
steephie22 (182 D(S))
01 Jul 15 UTC
Can you sue someone over a decade after a fatal mistake was made?
Title is pretty self-explanatory again.
19 replies
Open
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
26 Jun 15 UTC
OBERGEFELL v. HODGES
Landmark case by the SCOTUS grants equal marriage rights.
91 replies
Open
Page 1265 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top