So, based on Maniac's last couple of posts, his whole y2k/WD/uclabb theory was a bluff? Once again, I just don't get the point.
You asked which posts I found especially suspect, Maniac, so I'm referring to the one where you mention someone handing you a band-aid when you didn't need one, and the one where you create this former bodyguard role.
It's common knowledge that revealing an unsuccessful doc save doesn't actually help the humans in any way, not that I think it really helps the scum all that much either, it can help them try to narrow down who the doctor is and make things harder for the rest of us. So why make a post that all but makes that claim? Most of your other strange plays, I can attribute to your playstyle being similar to the way krellin's incited dissenting opinions and tried to force other players into the light, but this one in particular makes no sense to me.
As for your argument regarding my voting for someone I thought was town: given the suspicion around krellin's claim, if Squigs were a town power role he would've had to make a complete claim in order to get anyone to believe it, meaning if it were false, it could be counterclaimed. I never said I thought he was a town power, just that I thought he was playing like he was holding something back, or had something to hide: a non-vanilla role. If that was as a town power role, then he would've claimed at the end, but as lizard or mutant he might not claim. You'll note that in all of our games, scum have yet to make a fake claim that could be counterclaimed. So I decided that I didn't have enough to justify switching my vote to y2k, but I had to vote on someone, and I still found Squig's play indicative of a "non-vanilla" role. So I figured there was a potential risk of hitting a human, but still a fair chance to hit a scum with the Squigs vote, or I wouldn't have joined it in the first place.
Maniac, you call my case against bo_sox good, but refuse to offer an actual opinion on his guilt or innocence. And you're trying to pull attention away from him as a lynch target because you'd rather we don't shoot your last lizard buddy. You also seemed to ignore the fact that ghug brought the bo_sox case up first, only saying that he's "risen up" in your estimation, meaning you think he's too right to try and get him killed? Sure, that leap of logic is based entirely on confirmation bias surrounding bo_sox, but you don't seem to have any problems using that sort of thing in your arguments, do you?