The last process time was over 12 minutes ago (at 07:21 PM UTC); the server is not processing games until the cause is found and games are given extra time.

Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 704 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Rugrat (100 D)
01 Feb 11 UTC
The game Hello my Brothers 3
It was clear from the first year that 3- 5 players were working together. That ruins the live games. Russia, England, and France made moves no one would make in a game with unknowns.
12 replies
Open
pastoralan (100 D)
01 Feb 11 UTC
Pre-Pause for US Storm?
So pretty much the whole northern US is getting whacked by a storm, and I know I'm not the only person who might be without power for a good long time. Perhaps those of us in the path should vote pause, with the understanding that the other players should also pause if we vanish for a couple of days.
17 replies
Open
thedayofdays (95 D)
01 Feb 11 UTC
Leisurely Playing the Game of Diplomacy
Perhaps it's just me, but do some people take this game way too seriously? Here I am, playing Diplomacy for fun, countlessly running into people, other players, that I can't help but to assume have a dictionary nearby whenever they play the game. Intimidation via vernacular, if you will. And to be honest, I find this concept incredibly humorous. Anybody else?
16 replies
Open
Ges (292 D)
01 Feb 11 UTC
Pick up Italy in a locked 24 hr low-stakes WTA game?
gameID=46247

Italy is at 7 SCs but about to hit 5. The players in the game have been very dependable -- no other NMRs up to 1905. A good bet for a decent player who enjoys negotiation. The password is playfair.
0 replies
Open
samdaman02 (100 D)
01 Feb 11 UTC
Cool!
Guys please join cool! the game..
0 replies
Open
rayNimagi (375 D)
31 Jan 11 UTC
Need 1 More Player for Newbie Game
See inside
11 replies
Open
IKE (3845 D)
31 Jan 11 UTC
Today is my web dip birthday
I just turned 2 and have not learned a damn thing yet. Maybe when I'm 3 I will know how to play this game:)
Happy birthday to anyone else who has the same web dip birthday.
14 replies
Open
obiwanobiwan (248 D)
01 Feb 11 UTC
This Time On Philosophy Weekly: "Will you be kind enough to justify your existence?"
The above quote is from my SECOND-favorite playwright of all-time (we ALL know who my favorite is) Mr. George Bernard Shaw, who was staunchly of the opinion that life SHOULD have a purpose, and that if it didn't...well, he didn't look kindly on that, but let's focus on the positive--IS there such a thing as "purpose/justifying your existence?" Is it granted naturally, or obtained? Can it be lost? WHAT IS IT? And if there IS no justification for existence...what THEN?
1 reply
Open
Baskineli (100 D(B))
30 Jan 11 UTC
Anonymous games are evil - discuss
I consider FTF Diplomacy to be the purest. When playing FTF, you often know who are the players you are playing against, you know their history and how they play. This allows a more intricate diplomacy. By playing anonymous games on WebDiplomacy, we ignore the most fundamental side of FTF Diplomacy - history.
63 replies
Open
Indybroughton (3407 D(G))
30 Jan 11 UTC
PPSC v WTA: A top 100 GR player fails to understand the controversy around 17 17 games
As so eloquently stated in a post yesterday, "PPSC is NOT a gentleman's game. PPSC isn't anything good."

Please elaborate. I promise a good faith attempt to try to understand why PPSC games are inherently evil.
100 replies
Open
Alderian (2425 D(S))
29 Jan 11 UTC
In memory of charlesf
charlesf appeared on the webdip scene on December 10th of 2010. He had one bad game experience so came to the forum to both talk about how this site could be better and to get a better quality game going.

He was last seen on January 10th of 2011 when he had the audacity to leave his country in Civil Disorder in that game.
22 replies
Open
dgtroop53no (0 DX)
31 Jan 11 UTC
last person to post wins
999999
0 replies
Open
Hermes (100 D)
31 Jan 11 UTC
1 slot left!
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=48732
0 replies
Open
Hermes (100 D)
31 Jan 11 UTC
New Live Game starts at 9pm GMT
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=48721
0 replies
Open
centurion1 (1478 D)
30 Jan 11 UTC
how to lose a game.
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=48551

sweet mother of jesus your name suits you quite well.
40 replies
Open
djbent (2572 D(S))
31 Jan 11 UTC
live game today (mon jan 31) at 10am eastern?
i know i should post this in the live games thread, but oh well.
i would like to play a quality live game today at about 10am eastern (4pm spanish time, in about 3 hours) -- classic, small pot, anonymous or not, full press. any takers?
13 replies
Open
Furball (237 D)
28 Jan 11 UTC
Diplomacy: Best approach?
I'd just like to discuss about how to approach in compromise and resolve through diplomacy. I'd like to know your guys opinions about what you think is the best form of diplomacy.

I'd also like to ask your guys opinions about what basis you guys form when creating an alliance. As in, do you guys form rules to be kept when you guys make an alliance?
21 replies
Open
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
24 Jan 11 UTC
WACcon (Seattle) 2011
Dumbass of the Tournament Award: MadMarx
Page 2 of 3
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
fiedler (1293 D)
25 Jan 11 UTC
I don't, it sounds humiliatin! Marx...do ya think turkey was just pretending to be a noob?
spyman (424 D(G))
25 Jan 11 UTC
MadMarx, why didn't you say "DO YOU KNOW WHOM I AM!" Namely, the greatest player in the history of Webdiplomacy! The greatest diplomacy website in the world!
Did you tell them how many points you have?
spyman (424 D(G))
25 Jan 11 UTC
Oh well ,it is clear that these know-nothing face2facers do not realize the significance of ghost ratings!
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
25 Jan 11 UTC
fiedler, Barn3tt told me that in Turkey's game the night before, that Turkey ordered a fleet to Munich, so I think he was pretty new. Also, Remember the Turk shared a three-way draw with Italy/Barn3tt the night before, so that may have played a part to some degree in Turkey siding with Italy rather than me, Turkey new Italy was a good ally to have and I was just another chump off the street Turkey didn't know from Adam. Also, I chatted with Turkey/Italy before game three and they said that they could have easily gotten a three-way draw with England, but England didn't want to take out his "buddy" Germany, which may shed a little light on how I couldn't get E/G to fight up north and they took me out. I have to rationalize this somehow, right, it certainly can't be my fault?! :-)

That's very good advice, Eden.

spyman, I was trying to make a joke about that in my description, when I brought up Keith Hernandez. Watch less than a minute of this:

http://vimeo.com/4288854

Anyway, if I don't laugh at how crappy I played face to face, I will cry, and I prefer to laugh! (and thought a few others on here might enjoy laughing at me too)

PS - ava, I hope you do realize I was totally joking around with you, some on this site have said they can't tell when I'm kidding around or not, so I wanted to clear that up just in case.
Draugnar (0 DX)
25 Jan 11 UTC
This thread +1

Best thread to read in a l-o-n-g time.
SacredDigits (102 D)
25 Jan 11 UTC
My first f2f experience...heck, my first Diplomacy experience...was at a gaming convention that I went to for D+D purposes. A good friend of mine told me they were going to cancel his Diplomacy tournament if he didn't get one more person, so I thought, whatever, I have time to kill.

I was France, and he was England, and as I looked at the board, I thought of COURSE England needs to come for me. And Germany. He assured me that he was more concerned with ending up in Russia, and I thought "That's insane, England in Russia." So I opened aggressively toward England and Germany, and didn't even think about getting into Iberia. Italy came in and carved me up. Meanwhile, England got into St. Pete's as promised, and I was astonished. It's since been my strategy every time I get England. So if you see me in a non-anon as England, and you're Russia, make sure you play for me against St. Pete's.
Alderian (2425 D(S))
25 Jan 11 UTC
MM, sounds like you are a victim of meta-gaming big time. Did you report it to the mods? :)

Seriously though, it sounds like in these tourneys people rely a lot on previous experience with others so a new guy is always going to get the short end of the stick.

Although that Turkey's new to the game status seemed to have overcome much of that since he could clearly be used, whereas you were dangerous and unknown so better to just off you.

Sounds like fun if you've got the time. Thanks for the good read.
Dan-i-Am 88 (348 D)
25 Jan 11 UTC
Ahh reading this makes me miss the ftf games I used to play. Too bad that was about 7 years ago and I sucked at Diplomacy then (not to say that I don't suck now, but you get my drift lol)

Does anyone know if there in anywhere in upstate New York, or anywhere in the northeastern U.S. to play Dip ftf with any sort of regularity?
SacredDigits (102 D)
25 Jan 11 UTC
I used to play in Buffalo at a hobby shop that may or may not be closed by now, given the state of both Buffalo and hobby shops. If you're interested, I'll contact some of my old friends and see.
Alderian (2425 D(S))
25 Jan 11 UTC
Dan-i-Am, check out:
http://www.diplom.org/DP-cgi/clubs?area=US

I've heard others mention that Edi Birsan was big on helping people find local clubs but I'm not sure how you go about contacting him. Hopefully someone else here knows.
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
26 Jan 11 UTC
Edi has contacts all across the US, probably all across the world, for live games and he's more than happy to reply to emails: [email protected]
Crazyter (1335 D(G))
26 Jan 11 UTC
Great thread MM, lots of colorful details! I attended one F2F--the 2009 Boston massacre and got killed in every game. Most of the people did know each other, and after reading this thread, I think that being a stranger/uknown was certainly a disadvangtage. It didnt occur to me until I read this thread, but yeah its definitely a form of meta-gaming.
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
27 Jan 11 UTC
Let's see, where did I leave off... Oh, yes, I was getting my ass kicked, by every single person in game two, including Barn3tt, that's right, how could I have forgotten?!

So, I went back to my room and sulked for a good hour or so. I had planned to meet a guy I went to high school with around 4pm for coffee, but even after sulking for over an hour it was only about 2pm and I had lots of time to kill, so I gave him a call and we met for lunch. While waiting for Jeff, I ran into Starbucks and bumped into a guy from the tournament, who also obviously didn't do so well in game two, so we shared a few war stories. Well, his stories paled in comparison to mine, but we both got a good laugh at our own expense and we parted ways.

It was nice to get a break for the action, even though I hadn't had much action yet. I arrived back at the tourney about 15 minutes before we started up again and asked Turkey and Italy/Barn3tt how the game turned out. They were both really nice guys and we chatted about how England wouldn't kill off Germany since they were buddies and that's when Barn3tt and I discovered we both played on webdip, but we didn't ask who each other was, Barn3tt did say he mainly played live games and since I never really play live games we sort of left it at that.

So, time for game three! Going into it, I was pretty confident I'd do well in this game, mainly because I had a 1:15pm city-league basketball game the next day so I'd need to get up at 6:30am for the ~6 hour drive home, game three was sure to last well past midnight for me, I was on a roll.

I reached into the hat, trying not to think of any country, and out came another white army. The tournament director said that if we get a repeat country we are free to swap, but if nobody wants to, tough, we'd just have to figure it out. The next guy picked Turkey, he was one of the tournament directors that was Germany in my game two, and he was Turkey in game one, so asked if anyone wanted to swap. I'm not a big fan of Turkey, but I was glad to swap! As soon as I gave him Russia, someone got Austria and asked to swap, so the tourney director, Nathan, took Austria.

In my first two games, Turkey and Italy teamed up in both. In this game, I was Turkey. Italy was the guy I had been hanging out with before game three, along with Barn3tt, the new guy that was Turkey in game two and allied with Barn3tt/Italy, and he was a cool guy, so we obviously talked about another I/T alliance in the pregame. I chatted with Austria, who had seen me get destroyed in game two, and who knew about my game one debacle, so when I told Austria/Nathan that all I wanted was to make it to 1905, he assured me he would help me do that much. A side note, there were only 20 people for the third game, so one person had to play two games so we could fill three boards. That person was Nathan, Austria in my game three. So, guess who Russia was... No, not Time Clock Italy, it was the guy I ran into at Starbucks who was a very friendly guy and we made quick plans! The Russian started out by saying the game was set up for a Jugg, because Nathan/Austria was playing two boards and Italy was a noob. Suppose I am a bit of a Boy Scout because I thought it was a bit rude to take advantage of a guy who volunteered to play two boards as well as to zero in on a noob, but after my first two games, I just ignored those arguments and discussed the R/T. Russia said Nathan would want to kill Italy because Italy, the noob, was actually in contention for winning the tourney. Anyway, goal number one was to kill off Austria, so Russia and I talke Italy into joining us to blitz Austria.

Due to my wealth of experience and expert play, I managed to secure Bulgaria in 1901, which did make most people on the board very nervous, but with my silver tongue I was able to convince them they need not fear me. Suckers!!

Actually, the first few years were pretty boring, as Turkey. Russia kept claiming to want to kill Austria, but also that we needed to prop Austria up to insure Italy didn't grow beyond five units. Russia subtly lied to me a number of seasons in a row, doing such things as telling me to dislodge his fleet in Rum so he could rebuild an army, yet mysteriously Austria would support hold Rum unbeknownst to Russia and that Austria made a lucky guess to mess up the "obvious" R/T plan to get rid of the Russian fleet. The Austrian played his part well, having to split his time on two boards, didn't seem like he had much time to plot with Russia, but they were just buddies and could plan quickly. Anyway, Italy and I tried to work with Russia to kill Austria, yet Austria never got below four units and somehow kept maintaining year after year.

In fall of 1904, I think, Austria finally got in a position to actually take Greece from me, and knock me down to four units, while Russia had attacked Armenia with an army. Russia assured me that he would go back to Sev while he encouraged me to cover both Ank and Smy if I did not trust him, which I clearly did not, but being the ignorant dumbass I am, I decided to trust him a little and only cover Smy, hope Arm would go back to Sev, and use Bul to support Black Sea to Rum since it was nearly certain I would lose Greece to Austria. Luckily for me, Rum hit Bul without support to help Austria take Greece, so I got Rum! Arm attacked Smy, not Ank, so I maintained my five units even with losing Greece, taking Rum from Russia. Russia was pleased to see that I had finally lied to him after he had been lying to me repeatedly, suppose it eased his conscious a bit, and I congratulated Russia on us finally destroying that fleet of his, we were all having a good time even with all the lies going around, which was a welcome change in attitude from game one with Time Clock Italy and that Asshole Russian that came after me straight away.

The next spring saw Arm go to Ank, and I evicted him in the fall, and Russia destroyed that army. That was coupled with England stabbing Russia in the north, so Russia's game was about over, Russia even told me that if Austria wanted to help me take Sev that I should do it, which was a cool gesture. Austria had taken control of the southeast, as far as who was calling all the shots, and I was fairly safe in my corner with five units. This is were things got a little sketchy. Austria, clearly out of pity, and me being a total charity case after my first two games, came up with a big plan to convoy Bul to Venice to knock down Italy. I felt bad that I sucked so bad at F2F that people adjusted their play for me to have a little fun, but I was happy to accept the charity given the circumstances, pathetic I know, but oh well. We did that, I got a build, then I made a move on Sev to get up to six units. By that time it was about midnight and people wanted to wrap things up. Austria and I clearly had the southeast stalemate position within our grasp and the game should have been a four-way with us and E/F. England refused to include Austria in the draw, said he'd agree to a three-way with me and France, excluding Austria. Austria wanted to wrap up the tourney and was glad to comply, so we voted for a three-way draw that included me.

Game three was pretty boring, at least from a story-telling perspective, but it was nice to end on a positive experience, especially after the first two games. The overwhelming majority of the guys there were really nice and fun to play diplomacy with, but as I should have expected, there were a couple people I'd just as soon never see again. OH, speaking of, Time Clock Italy was in the process of getting eliminated in his game three, about 20 feet from my table, and we could all here him saying that the two people taking him out were stupid, that this was the worst game he's ever been a part of and if those two continued to attack him he'd never play in Seattle again. I could not help but shout out across the room that those to should absolutely continue to attack Time Clock Italy, that the offer of him never playing in Seattle again was far too good to pass up! ;-)
Babak (26982 D(B))
28 Jan 11 UTC
MM... thanks for sharing these stories... you MUST submit these to one of the mags... they would LOVE to publish them and both your style, and your perspective will be appreciated. dont pass up the chance, just copy paste these 3 and send it over to DipWorld... I can send you the email of the guy if you PM me your email.

lessons about ftf: 15 minutes is SHORT when you have to talk to 6 others, make plans, AND figure out good tactics. you need to become far more concise, to the point, AND observant... part of the strategy of diplomacy in FTF is not allowing your 'friends' to talk to your 'enemies'. try to keep your friends occupied either with yourself or with other irrelevant players so they dont have the TIME to get to know or establish relationships with your other neighbors or current enemies. time management... your own AND other players is a big part of the ftf game.

also - you can overcome newbishness... just make sure you reflect competence... in FTF, the worst ally you can have is an incompetent player - because they will mis-order, they will be easily swayed by bad advice, and they will be easily snookered and unavailable to help YOU when THEY should for their own good. so most players look for competence in their allies... yes it increases the risk of being stabbed - but at least you'll know they will stab you when you have left yourself open (physically or diplomatically) rather than randomly when it only helps some other player...

so MM, if I were in your shoes, I'd make sure all the players knew that I played regularly online and that I was pretty damn good... maybe not come off as an arrogant prick but as a competent potential ally.

another point, for 1901, unlike the advice I gave in the SoW thread, I encourage bounces in FTF. bounces in bla, gal, bur, ech, pie, tyl, or even tri/ven are much more common in FTF and for good reason. paranoia runs supreme when you have to deal with six random people in 15 minutes. its better to have a plan where you can both KNOW you'll be safe, then a plan where you both fear the 1901 stab.

and yes... 1901... TALK first AND last... haha. my tactic is I usually look at my #1 and #3 "talk-to-players" and say... "I need to talk to you Russia/England/whatever" then grab the guy I need 2nd most and talk to him first... usually pretty quickly... then #3 guy if I can, and then the #1 guy... because by then I have a much better feel of where our mutual neighbors might be headed and have useful info to share and be a useful ally. I pull this off by acknowledging his fears/concerns (put myself in his shoes) then giving in to his #1 priority for the spring, while trying to get a concession from him for the fall. in FTF, I like to first SHOW that I am reliable... because trust gets built up faster.

anyways, I'm writing too much... thanks again MM for the report - and I do hope you decide to print it in one of the zines.
skyblueshu (100 D)
28 Jan 11 UTC
@MadMarx: I wrote a diplomacy world article on the "club like" nature of face to face players. If you have time to read it, I am curious if your face-to-face experience is similar to what I described in the article. I would love to get your feedback. The article can be found here. It's issue 104. I think it was publish in December of 2008 or January of 2009. The article is called "Join the Club" and it appears on page 61.

Thanks,
Sky

http://www.diplomacyworld.net/pdf/dw104.pdf
skyblueshu (100 D)
28 Jan 11 UTC
BTW, I know the players you are referring to. The crazy Russian in your first game drives me nuts too! I think that's part of his strategy. He makes a crazy demand to one player and two things happen. Either he agrees and they have a great alliance, or Crazy Russian takes this information to the other guy and says he cannot work with you and is willing to do what it takes to make an alternate alliance work. Could work. Guy still drives me nuts though. And Time Clock... love that guy. Love him for all the same reasons he drove you nuts.
Jamiet99uk (873 D)
28 Jan 11 UTC
You know what's funny? I actually find F2F games easier than on here. On here, I find it a problem that I can't look the person in the eye when I'm negotiating with them - I find people's true intentions much harder to read when it's all just text.

That said, I did play F2F for several years before joining this site, so it's probably understandable that I feel more comfortable in a F2F setting since that's how I learned to play.
peterwiggin (15158 D)
29 Jan 11 UTC
I only play one or two ftf games a year, and I find them absolutely exhausting. Generally, I do fairly well, but that probably has a lot to do with the fact that usually at least four of the other players are new to the game. Someday, I will go to one of these conference things and see how people actually play the game . . .
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
30 Jan 11 UTC
skyblueshu, my stories were meant, in large part, for a few laughs. I don't have a problem with a Russia that takes a hard line with Austria when it comes to Galicia, or any player that thinks it is in their own best interest to make relatively extreme demands, the thing that I mostly took offense to was that this person told me he knew this was my first face to face game and that he would turn the board on me to kill me. I understood this to mean that the Russian knew others on the board and that he would team up with his "buddies" to kill off the new guy. This may not have been the case, that it was a matter of buddying up against me, but even if it was just that he had a bit of face to face experience and planned to use that against the new guy with no face to face experience, I still didn't appreciate the sentiment. I've "known" a few F2F guys, including Edi Birsan, that claim they want to grow the population of F2F players. What this Russia did to me is extremely counterproductive to that end, even if I understand that this Russia wasn't interested in growing the F2F population and even if I understand Edi et al have no control over this Russia's actions.

I have discussed WACcon a bit with Nathan, one of the hosts, and he says that in face to face games people often tend to play the other people a bit more than the board, especially relative to PBEM/webdip. So, obviously, the more familiarity you have with other people, the more you know what to expect from them, so I think there certainly is a disadvantage for new people joining in games with people that have played together a bit. Exactly how big of an advantage, I don't know, but I certainly hope my comments haven't discouraged any people from trying out F2F games. I'm very glad I went to WACcon and had fun meeting a bunch of new people, and even the few that left a bit of a negative impression with me mostly seemed like good guys that I could easily have good exeriences with in future games, so I'd encourage everyone on webdip that hasn't played F2F to make a point to find a game in your area to join in the very near future, or even feel free to get to Boston this June for our WebDip Tourney! :-)
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
30 Jan 11 UTC
Babak, I appreciate your encouragement, but I can't imagine submitting my story to be published, especially without quite a bit of editing. I was mainly goofing off a bit and embellishing some details purely for entertainment value and I'm not looking to sound like an ass on that type of platform, I just figured some people on WebDip know I like to joke around a bit so they'd take what I had to say with a grain of salt...

Thanks for your suggestions on F2F play, I'm confident those tactics have served you well. F2F certainly is much different than WebDip, especially my favorite type of game, which is completely anonymous where I know nobody in the game and it's all about reacting to ONLY what people have said and done within that specific game.

Oh, skyblueshu, I'll try to check out that article you read and comment on it, but it may take me a few days, I'm on a break! ;-)
Troodonte (3379 D)
30 Jan 11 UTC
This thread makes me want to try FTF so much...
Anyone knows about this kind of conferences in Europe? Interested specifically in Portugal or Spain.
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
30 Jan 11 UTC
Troodonte, I'd try Edi, per my previous message:

Edi has contacts all across the US, probably all across the world, for live games and he's more than happy to reply to emails: [email protected]
Alderian (2425 D(S))
30 Jan 11 UTC
Just doing some googling, you could try here as well:
http://www.diplom.org/Face/hobby_info/

I have no idea how up to date it is.
Crazyter (1335 D(G))
31 Jan 11 UTC
See recommendations below. Babak +1 especially about the PACE of the FTF. 15 minutes is not enough time to negotiate with everyone you need to talk to, especially if you are G in 1901 like I was in my first game!, plus you have to write down your orders, plus I spent quite a bit of time WAITING IN LINE to talk to someone if they were busy talking to someone else. And worst of all, the first 2-3 or even 5 minutes were usually spent reading the orders and moving the pieces on the board, leaving only 10-12 minutes for diplomacy and order-writing.

So before attending a FTF, including our Boston torunament, I recommend:
1. Read the Edi Bersan article---MM has a link
2. Play a few live games on this site, that will get you used to the frenetic pace that you will need to think and move by.
MadMarx (36299 D(G))
31 Jan 11 UTC
skyblueshu, thanks for the link to your article. I don't have enough experience at face to face to know exactly what I think yet, but am not so sure there is a club per se. I think a lot of it boils down to people being more likely to align with others they have experience with because that way you can predict that person's behavior better. Anyway, check out this article on the topic, I think it's also a pretty good read:

http://www.diplom.org/Zine/F2002R/Barnes/deMetaGaming.html
spyman (424 D(G))
31 Jan 11 UTC
I am curious to know if these experienced face-to-racers also play online.
Kingdroid (219 D)
31 Jan 11 UTC
BTW, just who *is* edi birsan. i understand that he's a great diplomacy player, and has popularized it.. but.... is there more to it? or what?
Kingdroid (219 D)
31 Jan 11 UTC
Also, just saw the tentative tourney in San Francisco.

If it happens, I'm down.
hellalt (24 D)
31 Jan 11 UTC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edi_Birsan
Birsan has been playing Diplomacy since 1965 at age 16 and has won many tournaments. He was the first non-South African to win the South African tournament, first non-Canadian to Win the Canadian Championship, first non Russian to win the Russian Championship and first Non-European to win the European Championship.
He was a founder of several Diplomacy hobby organizations and consultant to Avalon Hill on the rewrite of the rules of the game in 1999. He is best known for inventing the Lepanto and Sealion openings.
Lepanto opening: http://www.diplom.org/~diparch/resources/strategy/articles/lepanto.htm
Sealion opening: http://devel.diplom.org/Zine/S1997M/Birsan/Sealion.html
Kingdroid (219 D)
31 Jan 11 UTC
Thanks

Page 2 of 3
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

66 replies
Serioussham (446 D)
27 Jan 11 UTC
One last game.
A dynamic game would be nice.
15 replies
Open
airborne (154 D)
31 Jan 11 UTC
My First Commentary
The quality should be better going to fix those issues soon I hope.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_OhOUiWeMQ
0 replies
Open
Troodonte (3379 D)
27 Jan 11 UTC
Another Big Pot Gunboat
Post your interest and conditions
It will be Anonymous and WTA. Buy-in > 200 D (to discuss).
36h (to discuss) with COMMITMENT TO FINALIZE (this is important!).
70 replies
Open
The Czech (40499 D(S))
30 Jan 11 UTC
Gunboats?
Anyone up for Live gunboats?
30 replies
Open
Tolstoy (1962 D)
28 Jan 11 UTC
The Revolution WILL Be Televised
http://english.aljazeera.net/watch_now/
22 replies
Open
Kingdroid (219 D)
30 Jan 11 UTC
Maybe this should be deleted? lol
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=7239#gamePanel
8 replies
Open
basvanopheusden (2176 D)
29 Jan 11 UTC
Why can’t I surrender?
My proposal: let players vote for resignation, and if everyone agrees, the game ends.
28 replies
Open
iMurk789 (100 D)
28 Jan 11 UTC
CoHO
just wondering if anybody else on webdip enjoys the scrumptious online action of this game
10 replies
Open
gunboat in the ancient med!
join epicicity, the epic game of epicness!48548
0 replies
Open
gunboat in the ancient med!
join epicicity, the epic game of epicness!
0 replies
Open
idealist (680 D)
28 Jan 11 UTC
Resolved: Democracy flourishes through compromise
discuss
21 replies
Open
SkitchNM (100 D)
29 Jan 11 UTC
I think I've played way too much Diplomacy lately
Every time I watch the news, I can't help but think: Egypt has gone into CD!
12 replies
Open
Page 704 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top