The case against our best friend Krellin:
pg 1 - doesnt like wild accusations and says that we should just kill chaqa and end the day (later says this was a joke)
pg 2 - says that he wants to play devil’s advocate to get the ball rolling (perfect cover for scum) criticizes the volume of criticism that uclabb and squigs are posting
pg 3 - advocates a no-vote and posts nonsense posts
pg 4 - posts a lot of procedural stuff, and then says that he is for sure going to ridicule the analysis that people are posting
pg 5 - posts more stuff about procedures, says that he is trying to spark conversation so that he can get reads on people
pg 7 - states that no one wants to hear his opinion and that he will be leaving
pg 8 - says that he posted reads (not sure where) and then votes himself and votes end
pg 9 - throws his vote on Maniac for being a BW driver and bloodthirsty clown
pg 10 - throws his vote on PJ because … I am not sure, but I think it is because Krellin believes that PJ’s vote on Krellin is contradictory to something he said, then he says that he wants to vote off lurkers, and votes ILN
pg 11 - Gives his first real case… but is about why to vote out lurkers, presses ILN hard because he has lurked and didnt give an explanation for his vote on Krellin (defensive??)
pg 12 - Says that his approach to this game was to be a moron in order to stir up discussion, votes ghug because he is a lurker
pg 13 - continues to advocate killing lurkers, calls Bo’s actions contradictory.
So most of what he posted on the first… 11 pages was complete nonsense. Krellin acknowledges that. On page 12, he comes forward and says that he was advocating nonsense on purpose in order to stir up discussion. Since then, he has advocated killing lurkers. How is this any better than the first 11 pages. Krellin says he has posted reads, but I could not find them anywhere, so maybe they are hidden somewhere, or coded or something?? If he is telling the truth about intentionally screwing with us day 1, then he should be posting clear straightforward reads for us, and make cases for why people are scum, not advocating killing lurkers. He posted a few good points about why someone might be scummy, but two posts later he moves on to someone else, and does not press them at all. I dont see ANY pro-town behavior, but I do see a whole lot of posting, a whole lot of nonsense, and a whole lot of distraction.
Here is a post from Krellin:
“When I was mafia, I watched **days** or such discussion fly by, with rabid townies insisting that they *knew* who was suspicious, and then they lynched innocent townie after innocent townie. It was hillarious...and it was quite eye opening.”
It seems to me like Krellin has been sitting back and watching us this game as well. Please guys, vote Krellin out.
)
Oh noes...the AIDS Researchers...
)
)
)
)