I think ILN is just a player going through the ups and downs of the first day of his first game. To clarify, I think he's got a lot to work on. He hasn't posted enough, obviously, and the argument he just made against krellin frankly isn't good. There are plenty of holes, and it looks like he's using his vote as a way of defending himself rather than scumhunting, which is a mistake that he's going to carry for however long this game lasts for him. Still, I don't think he's doing this because he's scum but because it's a little bit overwhelming to take an accusation so quickly from krellin of all people, who, in case you've never met him, tends to be very thorough and persistent. After M3, where I replaced Dr. O and had to try to fix the shitty position he put himself in, I sympathize with ILN because this is exactly what just happened to me weeks ago, and I believe that the moves he's making are not scum tells but him trying to work out what he needs to do. We should be giving him a shot.
@krellin ... the reason I'm not voting for a lurker is because today's vote is for information. We hope to lynch scum, and given the cases made against Squigs, Chaqa, Maniac, and yourself, we're clearly trying to find the most likely scum. However, it's paramount that we begin to gather tendencies and voting patterns today as opposed to simply kicking out a lurker. If you have a reason to believe someone is scum for more than them lurking, then say so, but if you don't, day one isn't the time to take them out.
@Chaqa ... if you don't have any new ideas, just keep up with our discussions and talk with us. Don't make excuses.
@pj ... you said you didn't want krellin to lead the witch hunt against lurkers because you still see him as scummy, so what's your take on him basically donating his vote to you as long as you vote for who he wants? Seems to me like he's really trying to lead and so far you haven't exactly told him off for it.