@Yoyo - You voted DeathLlama with the reason that he posted this:
"In a game with more people and more mislynches, there are more mislynches and we can afford to dedicate some to vig shooting his 100%-town reads. (arguably they aren't 100%-town though as maf can influence, but that's beside the point)"
The context of that post is important - DL's post on the previous page was talking about the Vigilante being the only 100% town-directed kill in the game, so although he worded it badly, he was saying:
"we can afford to dedicate some to vig shooting his 100% town-directed reads".
However, even if you don't take it like this, do you really think a mafia member would tell the Vigilante to shoot townreads? Why would they do so? It has no impact on anything except to make the town suspicious of what they are saying and to make the Vigilante suspicious. This is a terrible reason to be voting for someone, and it's the only reason you gave.
@Chaqa - Can you explain your vote in more detail? It looks like you've just popped up because people were starting to vote for you, posted a vote based on a reason someone else gave and without giving any evidence, and then started avoiding talking about scum/townreads. Ghug, to me, is looking like he does every game - bullying people, hopping his vote around randomly, and trying to get people to talk. What is it that is 'off' about him?
I also want some more reads from you. It doesn't need to be a read on everyone - just people you've noticed - and it doesn't need to be strong either. Just write down things you have noticed and whether you think scum or town would be more likely to do them.
@Uclabb, Guak - Where are you?
I do not really know what to think of Brankl at the moment.
Also, @HR - I've not been won over, I'm seeing whether this approach works for me. I promised Ghug after last game I would try doing this once, to see if it actually helps.