Since you're struggling with reading comprehension again, I went ahead and hashed out all your bullshit in my last post. The idea was that you had your piece and you can take your ball and go play in the sandbox over there now while the rest of us try to have a constructive conversation.
As for liberalism. Web definition's here, to give a baseline:
"A political orientation that favors social progress by reform and by changing laws rather than by revolution."
As I said, virtually everyone in the US is a liberal by that definition. Of course, it goes further, and has more meaning than that (as that's not really saying much). Liberalism calls for constitutional, democratic (whether in the form of a republic or democracy) governance and protections of basic human freedoms, like expression of religion, free speech, and - get this - property rights in a capitalist society. Even those dreaded European 'socialists' are capitalists - just capitalists with a level of state intervention that you and I would find unacceptable. So yes, even by that much more qualified definition, virtually everyone is a 'liberal.'
Being a liberal doesn't mean you can't also be conservative. In fact, as conservatism is a relative ideology, and liberalism an absolute ideology - that is, conservatism defines itself relative to a time period, whereas liberalism is a set of static ideas - it is entirely incoherent to set conservatism and liberalism as opposites.