science is not dangerous, humans are dangerous, and science enables humans to do things which they were not able to do before.

Biology is not racist. Humans can be racist in their interpretation of biology, though that same could be said of religion or politics.

A socialist admitting they think something does not mean all socialists think that thing, just as the fact that one webdip player thinks it is a good idea for turkey to open to armenia doesn't mean others agree.

also, it looks like someone is wrong on the INTERNET!

so what, are you like a 15 year old facebook fascist?

lolwut

Biology is racist. It has proven that there are differences between the races...

Racism is about values, not about facts.

they fact that there are genetic differences between people is not racism.

biology is not discriminating based on race. If you choose to act on these genetic differences, that is racist, it is saying one difference is better or worse than another. which is not what biology 'proves'

"Cachimbo doesn't have black skin" is not a racist comment.

"Cachimbo doesn't have black skin therefore he can be our friend" is a racist comment where a value is attributed to the fact "having black skin" that is impossible to derive from the fact itself.

Can't derive an "ought" from that kind of "is".

orathaic ended the thread with his first reply.

Well mrya just claimed that IQ doesn't mean anything and we all have equal intelligence, and responded to my arguement before reading it... (I don't know mrya, she/he (transvestite) is an FB friend of a friend of mine, we are arguing on his status)

*the fact

but that aside. There is greater genetic difference between individuals within one 'race' than there are between the 'races' so if you only group things based on genetics you don't get races, you get broad gene pools of people which overlap where the lines dividing 'races' could be drawn.

the concept of race however is a social construct not something which you can define using biology.

Fact: The Aryan race is the most intelligent, good looking, and ultimately, superior to all others.
Is that racist? I say no. Is saying "Jews are inferior" racist? I say yes. Is saying "racial segregation is neccessary to weed out the inferior races" racist? Again, I say no.

Well no shit there are differences between the races. Race is a phenotype, which is determined in part by genetics.

But in terms of being racist in the "justifying discrimination" sense? lolno

"biology is not discriminating based on race. If you choose to act on these genetic differences, that is racist, it is saying one difference is better or worse than another. which is not what biology 'proves'"
agree

Fact: The Aryan race is the most intelligent, good looking, and ultimately, superior to all others.

I wouldn't say most intelligent, but certainly the most good looking.

"Well no shit there are differences between the races. Race is a phenotype, which is determined in part by genetics.

But in terms of being racist in the "justifying discrimination" sense? lolno"
Agree. When I claim that whites are on average better then blacks. I mean on average. I don't mean that were always better and if your aryan you are awesome. I mean that your more likely to be awesome if your aryan then if your black.

we should discrimniate based on colour, we should discrimniate based on other facts, such as being stupid (regardless of race) or other.

IQ is like measuring how fast you can run the 100 meters.

it is a measure.

You could use how tall someone is, or the RGB value of their hair.... IQ measures how well a person performs in IQ tests, which fail to include tests of tings like creativity, morality, or emotional intelligence.

It is like measuring how fast you run 100 meters without also testing your ability to throw a discus. A limited measure of you as a person.

*we should not discriminate based on colour.

that was my bad, and appears to be an incredibly racists typo.

"IQ is like measuring how fast you can run the 100 meters.

it is a measure.

You could use how tall someone is, or the RGB value of their hair.... IQ measures how well a person performs in IQ tests, which fail to include tests of tings like creativity, morality, or emotional intelligence.

It is like measuring how fast you run 100 meters without also testing your ability to throw a discus. A limited measure of you as a person."
Well, according to some people, IQ is just a meaningless statistic that is used by capitalists to justify exploitation.

By the way, 'black' sub-saharan africa has more genetic diversity than any other part of the world.

if i'm not mistaken there is more diversity in all the 'black' peoples and tribes of Africa than there is in the rest of the world.. Mostly because of a bottleneck event in our population's past.

"Fact: The Aryan race is the most intelligent, good looking, and ultimately, superior to all others.

I wouldn't say most intelligent, but certainly the most good looking."

Definitely the most intelligent, just because we get a nut like Hitler or Wilhelm II, doesn't mean we're less intelligent. Other races get nuts like John Locke, Napoleon, or MLK and they ARE less intelligent.

do people use your 100 meter speed to justify exploitation and discrimination?

"By the way, 'black' sub-saharan africa has more genetic diversity than any other part of the world."
I could believe that. And one of my friends is convinced the Maasai are the superior race. lol.

"do people use your 100 meter speed to justify exploitation and discrimination?"
Shit! Don't mention that! When mrya claimed there was no physical differences between males and females beyond their sexual organs and its unfair that females are discriminated against, I used the 100 meter race as one of the 4 examples that males and females are dominance...

*males and females are different.

What the fuck King Atom? How can you possibly justify saying whites are the most intelligent? When you normalize for schooling and income, the stats disagree. And since when is Napoleon not white? He was born on freaking Corsica or something!

Aryan and white are not exactly equivalent...
And who cares about blacks who over-achieve, there are just more whites than them...as for latinos they steal our jobs and give nothing back...as for Asians and everyone else pretty much, they're not cool people. They have their societie

"Definitely the most intelligent, just because we get a nut like Hitler"
Hitler wasn't Aryan, and judging by your facebook profile neither are you.

Although the IQ statistics I had don't mention Aryan as an ethnicity, so I can't say whether we are. However on religion, the study place Anglican highest, followed by atheism, following by Judaism, followed by agnosticism, I can't remember the rest. But Catholics had an IQ of like 97...

As for race:
By skin colour:
White: 101
Yellow: 106
Black: 88 (or 86, I forget)

"Hitler wasn't Aryan"
What the fuck?
"and judging by your facebook profile neither are you."
What the fuck? How the hell would you know my ethnicity based on that? I'm born Prussian, raised American!

Aryan's have blond hair and blue eyes. A good quality that both you and my Hitler lacked.