i dont really go for conspiracy theories as a whole just sometimes things dont add up, they seem a little to convient.@invitus just one question regarding jfk if he got shot from behind and to the right why did his head move backwards!simple physics!

you are incorrect.
I let evidence from both sides reach me, because I dont take my evidence from a 'side' if its biased its not evidence. its propaganda.

to be honest, the main reason I think the government did it, is because my friend was at the pentagon. outside. having a smoke.
and the gov lied about it. so I know beyond reasonable doubt that their lying about the pentagon, so why wouldnt they lie about the towers, and shanksville, and the whole goddamm thing?
now I dont expect you all to believe I had a friend outside the pentagon just because I said so, so i try to use other evidence to back up what I believe happened. most of what I found backs up what i already believe. thats why i believe it.
now if theres strong evidence against that, I will change my view.
such evidence has yet to come along

and basically, the governments account just doesnt 'add up'

sicarius, are you saying that if enough people argue that the world is flat (on the internet of all places...) that it must be true?

Sic Said: "I dont go to conspiracy sites. If I need information i find facts, not shadowed by either side"

Oh come on - where did you find these "facts"? on the internet, of course, just like I did. And what you found wasn't "facts" they were interpretations of observations. And again, I am a scientist at heart, I could care less what the truth is, I just want to know it. I saw the observations with my own eyes and heard what I thought were the most rational explanations and they meshed with mine so I was cool for about 5 years. Thats'when I started hearing that people didn't believe it and I wondered why. So I researched it - I went to the siites that had more observations and a differing interpretation of what those observations meant. And it really moved me (not in some emotional sence, but in a posinal sense). And I wanted to think about it before even looking at the debunking sites, so I held off for a day. Then I looked at them and time after time, just like creationists, it turned out that they were only giving you the evidence that supported their point of view and hiding the evidence that didn't support it. That's bullshit non-science and that's what the conspiracy people are doing in this case. They want SOOO bad for the government to be evil that they ignore evidence to the contrary and only present the evidence that supports their claim.

posinal = positional - I know some of you were looking that up to see what the hell I was talking about ;-)

I just meant that my position had actually shifted to the point of being in doubt of my original belief. This is critical to a searcher of truth - the willingness and ability to be shifted if presented with counter evidence. BUT it's also crucial to be able to evaluate rationally and logically the evidence.

well the governments evil either way.
I think they're behing 9-11, but if I see something that proves to me the contrary, then they're not behind it.

but even if they're not behind it, they lied about it

I should point out that I believed the governments story of 9-11 for a few years afterword. I didnt just assume they were behind it from the start.
was a little fishy though

sicarius, are you saying that if enough people argue that the world is flat (on the internet of all places...) that it must be true?

have you not heard of the flat earth society?

Sicarius: even if everyone else in the world said the earth is flat, if I had reason to believe it is round and no reason to believe otherwise, I would conclude it is round. The flat earth society is a tiny minority of the world's population, in the same way as 9/11 conspiracists are a tiny minority.

I dont see what you're getting at

you say you would believe something even if you were the only one to believe it
buuut
you're trying to get me to not believe something BECAUSE not a lot of people believe it? (which isnt necessarily true)

More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East, according to a new Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll.

No, No, No. I'm saying that you're crazy (along with a third of the american people, in the unlikely event you quote a true statistic) if you believe something that is so patently absurd.

Put yourself in the position of an american government wanting to go to war in the middle-east. Name the top three ways in which you'd persuade Congress, and your voting public, to support you.

1 fear monger
thats really the only way
that could include lots of propaganda, a false flag attack, \
or you could
idk man I'm not the gov

did you have something in mind?

guess not