Well, gavrilop's (wait a minute, gavrilop? I thought you were leaving? I don't mind you're still here though... Still haven't finished all games yet?) argument is the best argument so far, but using racist behaviour to provoke a reaction from anyone (no specific race) isn't racism actually. He's just pointing out how everyone is a hypocrite in that thread. And he does it in an offensive way, one to disagree with, I disagree with it, but I feel confident in saying that he doesn't treat people different because of their race on regular bases. I don't think krellin is a racist, not by my definition. He's provoking everyone in that thread, not just black people, not just white people, not just men, not just women. A lot of what he says in that thread is anti-racism as well. The whole thread is about how wrong a specific racist is after all. using racist words to prove an anti-racism-point is comparable to using anti-religious words to prove a religious point, which is what Jesus did. Nevertheless I disagree a lot with krellin's approach here. It's not what a racist would do though. He's fighting racism in the very same thread. Also it's 30 March 2012. Is that before or after we found out you don't even know shit about throwing dice? What I mean to say is that everbody screws something up every once in a while.
Do you know what I mean with kafkatrapping? That's why I use it.
Also, sociobiology is a new science. Lots of theories, lots of criticism. You can study it, but you still don't know a lot about how social behaviour has resulted from evolution, if that's true. You just know a load of theories.
)
The mind can change hell in heaven (?)
)
)
)