"We should go back to 28 teams. Get rid of the Oakland As & Tampa Bay Rays, since nobody ever shows up to their games even if they make the playoffs, particularly the Rays."
Right, get rid of the A's, an Original 16 team with multiple World Series championships...
Yeah--no. Keep them in Oakland or move them (plenty of cities want a team) but yeah, no, the A's don't get contracted in any baseball universe.
(As for the Rays...eh, they have a decent team...again, I'm more one for relocation than contraction, especially with the A's.)
"Florida should be a sports-free state. They don't believe in sports so stop giving them teams."
That may well be one of the dumber non-Stalin comments you've ever made.
Right, Florida doesn't believe in sports.
That's why they have 2 World Series titles...
A 3rd trip in the Rays' WS run...
3 Super Bowls between the Dolphins and Buccaneers...
A Super Team in the Miami Heat that just won the NBA Finals...
A Stanley Cup (the Lightning can stay, the Panthers should be relocated NOW)...
College Football programs with huge backings and multiple titles...
Hall of Famers, the former Orange Bowl, multiple Super Bowls hosted there...
Oh yes, Florida doesn't believe or care about sports at all, that's why it has teams in all 4 Major North American sporting leagues with multiple teams in 3/4 leagues and huge college football programs.
"I don't think moving to other locations helps matters. The new places never seem to get people to turn out to games"
Yeah, those ballclubs in New York and Brooklyn really went South and attracted no fans once they became the San Francisco Giants and Los Angeles Dodgers...
And moving the Atlanta Thrashers to become the new Winnipeg Jets, yeah, no attendance spike or improvement there at all...
And Nationals Park is just completely empty, moving the Expos to D.C. was a mistake.
(Well...it was, but not because D.C. doesn't draw fans and because relocation doesn't work because...it can and does...unless you're the Phoenix Coyotes.)
"just putting more teams with no history in the league ruins baseball."
In principle I'd agree, but at this point...well...
The youngest franchises--the Marlins, Rays, Diamondbacks and Rockies--have all been to World Series by now and have 10+ years of history...and the most recently moved team, the Nats, just made the playoffs and have a bright future, so as it stands, all existing teams have at least some history to be proud of.
"The glory days of baseball were the late 1980s early 1990s before the strike, when they had 28 teams. We need to go back to that era."
Baseball's had several glory years--
1920s to 30s...
Post-WWII to, say, 1969, when the Miracle Mets won the world series...
The 1970s and 80s saw football leap ahead, but also saw some really great teams and WS...
And so on.
Baseball's not back to pre-Steroid era popularity, but it's doing a lot better since the dog days of Barry Bonds, Sammy Sosa and their ilk.
2011 was a good postseason for baseball, capped by a great 7-game WS, including an historic night for Albert Pujos and one for the ages (and "Greatest Games" DVD collection) with the back-and-forth, extra-innings, Game 6 walk-off HR by David Freese.
2012 was...OK, not as good, but not bad, either, it was good to see the Orioles win again after so many losing seasons, and the Giants were a fun team to watch.
Baseball's doing alright.