Having read that GLAAD article you posted Putin, I actually hadn't thought of the word "homosexual" that way before. I suppose it does have that history, but I think now the clinical approach to sexual orientation is,on the whole, considerably less problematic than many many others.
I also object to the GLAAD article on their corrections to the names. They suggest "gay" and "lesbian" or "gay person/people" while I realize the term is used sometimes to refer to people of either gender, it rarely is by actual gays or lesbians themselves. And it always sounds really awkward, because the term "gay" really is more gendered than people realize. And I find it problematic the way in which that semantic convention marginalizes lesbians within the LGBTQ community, and completely erases bisexuals, transgendered and queer/gender-queer individuals. Because the fact is, even if you correct them, people will always revert to the short hand and say "gay community". I dunno.
I also have trouble with that article beyond that point, but that's a more than I want to go into here.