Thanks. I didn't want to bring the strategy into the discussion, but I guess it is relevant so I'll explain a bit: the basic premise of the company is to help highly technical people who want to start a company but don't know how to run a company. These are small startups that can't afford 'real' experts, so I work with people who know all the basic skills needed to run a company, including marketing strategies, finances, getting ivestors, setting up basic logistics, knowing which experts are needed etc. Furthermore, more specialised experts can be added to a team if needed, so the people are not necessarily broad, but the combined team provides all the help needed to build a company for a technical expert's technology. If you have a name that better describes that business logic, feel free to let me know ;-)
I appreciate the feedback though. I'm not ignoring advice, and I apologise if I gave that impression. The strategy is working quite well regardless of whether people think it should work, so I'm currently trying to work with the advice that I'm getting about the name rather than the strategy, but most criticism about the name seems to be tied to the strategy, which makes it hard to find an answer to what name would fit with this strategy. I did verify that I should indeed reconsider the name though, since I personally thought it was awesome and hadn't heard any criticism before so I assumed it worked. Thanks for that!