@CA, another factor, rightly or wrongly, I believe, is the fact that approximately 80% of the complaints against priests have been for male against male abuse - "homosexual" abuse (I put it in quotes because pedophilia is or should be in an entirely different category than typical homosexual or heterosexual behaviors/desires). The news and people in general, I suspect, are particularly fascinated and horrified by abuse of boys by much older men. There is a general assumption that abuse by a opposite sex individual is somehow more natural - when of course no abuse is natural. ...then of course there is the hypocrisy and closet-suppression angle... it makes for a better story - being that the church expects chastity from its priests *and* views homosexual behavior and desires as sinful. In all scandals people are particularly ready to hate and punish those who are dishonest... Example: Clinton, Bush, and Obama all used drugs when younger... Clinton lied about it ("I did not inhale"), Bush refused to discuss it, Obama admitted it openly and moved on. Of these Clinton's response is still a charged joke and source of ridicule. The others? Not so much. It is worth noting that no school scandal and cover-up has been shown (to my knowledge) to be traceable all the way to the Secretary of Education or the President... yet in the case of the church, it has been shown to go all the way to the top. This also sets them apart.