Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 1376 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Hippopankake (80 D)
12 May 17 UTC
(+3)
Brain bomb
Who is brain bomb
33 replies
Open
MajorMitchell (1874 D)
14 May 17 UTC
Football Diplomacy
Port Power give the Gold Coast Suns a flogging in Shanghai
9 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
14 May 17 UTC
Sassy Donald Trump
He's so sassy, your president. He's the sassiest.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3V6nysX2gU8
5 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (808 D)
12 May 17 UTC
(+1)
Would a chimpanzee wearing a suit be more effective at advancing the republican agenda?
Trump has failed to advance most of his agenda. At what point are the investigations such a distraction that it would be better for the republicans to put in a chimpanzee wearing a suit instead?
12 replies
Open
WyattS14 (100 D(B))
12 May 17 UTC
Steven King in public schools
Should Steven King short stories be used in high school English classes? Why or why not?
26 replies
Open
The Ambassador (124 D)
12 May 17 UTC
Calhamer prototype - feedback please
Hi folks - the Calhamer prototype of Dip has been rolling around in my head and I'm thinking of bringing it to the online community. But I have some questions that I'd appreciate your input into:
7 replies
Open
fourofswords (415 D)
13 May 17 UTC
question about convoying
If I am convoying a unit, plus supporting the convoying fleet with one supporting fleet, can an enemy unit disrupt the convoy by attacking the convoying fleet, thus stopping the convoyed army from being convoyed?(this is a serious question).
5 replies
Open
Hippopankake (80 D)
12 May 17 UTC
How come you can drink a drink but you can't food a food
If it's 0 degrees outside and itll be 2x colder tommrow how cold will it be?
16 replies
Open
MajorMitchell (1874 D)
13 May 17 UTC
Kindergarten of War~game 198164
Brainbomb's heretical(?) game
2 replies
Open
Hippopankake (80 D)
12 May 17 UTC
Classic map
What is the worst country in each of the playable maps ?
9 replies
Open
Hippopankake (80 D)
12 May 17 UTC
(+2)
Urgent question needs answering
If Gravity is so strong why dosen't it lift ??????
10 replies
Open
trip (696 D(B))
08 May 17 UTC
(+1)
A question
A few years back some mods made a stock reply that they would use when a troll was attempting to waste their time. Does anyone have that saved? Asking for a friend.
23 replies
Open
Durga (3609 D)
11 May 17 UTC
Need replacement England
7 day phase game, message the mods if you're interested in taking over for England. Reliable players only please.

http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=195293#gamePanel
20 replies
Open
brainbomb (290 D)
12 May 17 UTC
(+3)
Would drunk foodie feminist Jesus be more effective at advancing the republican agenda?
If there are 0 Jesus' and then you multiply by twelve Republicans how much freedom do you get? Probably not in the Bible but what if Jesus had many adopted children in secret gay love triangles with the apostles? Are Jesus secretly sane? Can you pour me a food? I am starving. I could really go fer a food yo.
13 replies
Open
CommanderByron (801 D(S))
12 May 17 UTC
(+4)
Are misogynists actually insane?
Possibry da bes 4um poest to xist en da histery ov webdip nd bi oull akounts wil bee 4 yeers two cum. Jus sayin I'm inb4 brainbomb on dis one
6 replies
Open
Lamish (0 DX)
12 May 17 UTC
(+2)
Is Jesus dead or living
Do you think that Jesus thinks that having babies is legal?
6 replies
Open
CommanderByron (801 D(S))
12 May 17 UTC
Hippo Pankake
Who is hippo pankake?
3 replies
Open
MajorMitchell (1874 D)
12 May 17 UTC
Seeking advice on Tax law in the USA.
How do tax laws in the USA treat the "proceeds of gambling" ?
15 replies
Open
DammmmDaniel (100 D)
12 May 17 UTC
AutoMute Threads made by certain individuals?
Is there a way to mute any threads made by someone automatically? This is obviously just a general question with no real targets..... Obviously.......*COUGH* *COUGH* *BB* *COUGH* *COUGH*. But seriously is there a way to auto mute threads made by someone?
2 replies
Open
CommanderByron (801 D(S))
12 May 17 UTC
Modern map
What's the best country on each map.
1 reply
Open
Hathkin (100 D)
12 May 17 UTC
Big Malware Alert
There's something nasty roaming the internet attacking windows machines not patched since March. Its just taken out half of the NHS. Anyone on Windows devices are advised to make sure their updates are up to date
2 replies
Open
Hauta (1618 D(S))
12 May 17 UTC
Would Pence be more effective at advancing the republican agenda?
Trump has failed to advance most of his agenda. At what point are the investigations such a distraction that it would be better for the republicans to put in Pence instead?
9 replies
Open
Babyburger (1564 D)
11 May 17 UTC
host webdiplomacy in LAN
Is it possible to host this game myself in a LAN network? I would like to play with my friends for points, but I understand that this would be unfair to the ranking on webDiplomacy. It would be nice if we could play the game offline.
8 replies
Open
xy4 (100 D)
12 May 17 UTC
Are feminists secretly sane?
Hey okes, today we gon' answer the puzzling quezdshun: Could Feminists actually have brain cells? Recent sciet.. scion... sceetoofeck research have prove dat we may one day meet a literate Feminist. This is good news because it is easier to prove dem wong. They actually see your points. A bit like wehn you drive a pencil through their skull, but ledz lev dat fo' an udder time. Post belo wat you rink.
4 replies
Open
brainbomb (290 D)
05 May 17 UTC
(+2)
Is there even a single solitary positive in the new house approved healthcare bill?
I'm trying hard to envision how this bill helps anyone at all. Can a Republican of webdip please step forward and spin this to sound semi-useful?
Page 7 of 11
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
JamesYanik (548 D)
09 May 17 UTC
(+1)
@orathaic

This is the crux of the argument that I always see: you wouldn't be where you were without "the collective!"

"You did bot build the roads or train lines which bring you to work,"

no, but let's consider the former, then the latter.

1. the roads were built by government, first decided by small communities. generally these roads are poorly kept and offer many problems. as demand rises for more high quality roads, that demand was met by private corporations, but they charge a slight fee for use. of course our interstate highway system was a product of government, but to pretend like this was not going to be created regardless of government intervention is ludicrous. with that having been said, the fact that these roads would cross over state lines made it necessary for the federal government to take a vested interest. however: these likely would have been made, with or without any one individual you speak to on this site

2. train tracks. haha... you mean the private corporation train tracks, where you have to PAY for a train ticket? because i do not OWE anything to train companies in the form of my sovereignty. i have bestowed no powers upon them.

"you did not pay for the research which invented the internet,"

neither did we, that came from Switzerland. oh, but Americans think they were VERY important with that, huh? nope, we only subsidized making mass server webs over the country. any idiot with millions of tax dollars could have done that... or any 100,000 individuals with 10$ each could have done that. oh well, i guess we'll never know.

"you did not pay for your schooling or your teachers' schooling."

oh! one I like. because my parents generation was much smarter than mine, and they ONLY had municipalities and county funding. kind of makes you think that the shouldn't be a power the federal government should possess. maybe... a responsibility of the community (NOT SOCIETY)

"You did not invent the vaccines which kept you safe growing up, or the rest of the medical technology which has kept infant mortality down."

ok... vaccines aren't produced by government, and WAY more miracle drugs are created by biotechs and pharmaceutical companies than by public universities. frankly, government regulation that has led to massive increases in drug prices has HURT us, despite trying to create a better product. but the corporations, so... this is not something we owe to THEM... unless you want a conglomerate corporate government where we have quasi-dictatorship via proxy o-

oh yeah that's fascism.

"You owe everything to our collective."

actually, we owe it to other individuals. and in return, we either work for them with pay, we pay them for their product, or we produce a service they want in which they pay us.

whenever you say "collective" you're being too ambiguous. by what you're described in your paragraph, i owe the vast majority of my rights to corporations! Horrifying!!

"Our society. Not necessarily one state, a flawed attempt to realise the potential of our collective."

now this simply isn't a sentence, but i think you confuse helping to people across this nation, to helping to people nearby you.

helping people nearby you makes sense, as they directly affect what you do, and are a part of your life. people across the country don't affect what you do, beyond either internet or corporate connections, which generally doesn't signify poverty.

"But everything you have done, earned, or been a part of, exists soley because we are a social species."

yes! because it helped each of us as individuals.

furthermore, I find it hard to believe that i've ever been very social with some homeless person in New York. i can empathize about stories i hear, but i am not actually connected with these people.

when you look at what is being demanded, the strict adherence to nationalized healthcare actually seems racist.

there are two people: neither have affected my life in any way, both are dirt poor, both who need help to survive. one lives in Montana, one lives in China. why do we only care about the one in Montana? nationalism is a refuge for people who lack true principle.

I still find it amazing that we're still friends with China by the way. much of the country runs as a corporate slave state for the poor working class, i've met people who have left that country, not the foreign exchange students who have only seen luxury in their life but people who got the hell out as soon as they could.

you help those around you, and you encourage others across the world to do the same. you do no create government programs mandating funds to inefficient systems, which help to entrap some people in poverty as it liberates some others, all in an attempt to make us feel good about ourselves**

**maybe you individually care about the people receiving the care, but the collective aggregate are a bunch of virtue signaling kids who haven't had to work for anything in their life, so i'm going to judge YOU orathaic as an individual, off of what they say and do collectively.

it's only fair.
MajorMitchell (1874 D)
09 May 17 UTC
"Yannick is one of the most articulate analysts on the Forum"
Gosh Zmaj, that is probably the most amusing comment you have ever posted, imho. Farcical, laughable and a collosal joke.
The importance I put on the "contributions" of Yannick is demonstrated by the fact that he is one of three players I have muted. Ssorenn, "Condescending Clown" and sweet James Yannick. A trio who make an extremely stupid "three ring circus", imho.
Hoorah for Capt Brad..getting all " Old Testament " again & reprising his "abortion is murder" theme. And continuing to ignore the untruthfulness, the legal fallacy and illogical nature of this claim.
Apparently not too busy to post nonsense while he packs his bags eagerly and makes arrangements to head off to that "Paradise for gun totin' Libertarians"... Somalia. ( Apologies to educated, honest and civilised Somalians. Mostly expatriates I would assume. )
Zmaj (215 D(B))
09 May 17 UTC
^An offensive and stupid rant.
Zmaj (215 D(B))
09 May 17 UTC
@Yanik

"there are two people: neither have affected my life in any way, both are dirt poor, both who need help to survive. one lives in Montana, one lives in China. why do we only care about the one in Montana? nationalism is a refuge for people who lack true principle"

I'm not sure it's that simple. Isn't it natural that I care more about someone in my country because I know he or she adheres to the same set of general principles that we share as a nation?
JamesYanik (548 D)
09 May 17 UTC
@Zmaj

well of course i'll care more about people who help pay for the national defense. with that having been said, i know people in Europe who are much nicer and kinder than some people i know in the united states, and would more closely reflect my own principles than people within the united states.

but getting your own house in order is a priority i suppose. still, i'm not simply going to ignore people in other countries due to their birthplace.

and if you're wondering why @MajorMitchell muted me, it comes from this thread:

http://www.webdiplomacy.net/forum.php?threadID=1461943#1461943

his lack of understanding in economics wasn't going unpunished.


**Side note: keeping calling me Yannick anyone who wants to. My favorite soccer players is Yannick Bolasie, so i'd be honored to join the ranks of such another esteemed Yanikian
JamesYanik (548 D)
09 May 17 UTC
my opposition to nationalism generally subsides come the next World Cup. just when looking at things historically, i can't say nationalism has been the most beneficial of human traits
Zmaj (215 D(B))
09 May 17 UTC
It should be a tool for survival and nothing else. What I mean is that Croatian nationalism was completely justified in the 1990s, when we fought for independence, while it is completely ridiculous now that there's no danger at all. In peacetime, it becomes a form of paranoia or, at worst, xenophobia.
MajorMitchell (1874 D)
09 May 17 UTC
Do "we" only care about one ? I accept in good faith that bloody-minded Capt Brad's claims about his charitable activities and I wonder whether he helps people in need both within and outside of the USA, I wouldn't be surprised to be informed that he does both.
I'm not a citizen of the USA ( oh lucky chap that I am ) but I've done both..used donations to recognised, well run charitable organisations to assist young girls, often, but not always in villages where Islam is the dominant religion ( in Nepal, Thailand, Pakistan and a couple of other places )
And I have helped those in need in my own country.
It's a natural thing to help those in need who are closest... Family members, members of one's own community. But it's not, or shouldn't be an "either /or" proposition
CAPT Brad (40 DX)
09 May 17 UTC
zmaj do you know what a budget is? when you have just enough money to pay your rent, utilities and groceries. should you spent a night in an expensive hotel? there is not enough money to pay for everything. basic understanding of economics teaches that finite resources must be allocated. but growing up under communism that can be understood. as for dismissing james' detailed explanation as a rand is just childish, perhaps another symptom of communistic thinking.
Hauta (1618 D(S))
09 May 17 UTC
@Brad, "there is not enough money to pay for everything". Sure, people like you Brad, might not have enough to bear the full burden, but I'd hate to see some billionaire go without a 2nd yacht. Maybe he could contribute a tad more?
SamWest (100 D)
09 May 17 UTC
(+2)
Anything other than full nationalization of healthcare is immoral tbh
StevenC. (1047 D(B))
09 May 17 UTC
(+2)
^To you.
Zmaj (215 D(B))
09 May 17 UTC
(+1)
@Brad, you misunderstood. I agreed with Yanik and dismissed MajorMitchell's rant. I'm totally against communism precisely because I grew up under it.
JamesYanik (548 D)
09 May 17 UTC
@Hauta

when that billionaire dies, 40% of that 994,510,000 goes to the government (first 5.49 Million are not taxed)

quite frankly the government is doing a shit ton to prevent build up of wealth.
JamesYanik (548 D)
09 May 17 UTC
also, don't forget these rich fat cats generally employ thousands upon thousands of employees.
Zmaj (215 D(B))
09 May 17 UTC
@Yanik, don't forget that employing other people makes you a bad guy if you don't pay them at least as much as you earn yourself.
JamesYanik (548 D)
09 May 17 UTC
of course that makes them completely evil zmaj.
Hauta (1618 D(S))
09 May 17 UTC
You would have to be an idiot not to take advantage of any of the multitude of loopholes to avoid estate taxes.
Ogion (3882 D)
09 May 17 UTC
(+1)
oh, there's not enough money to pay for socialized health care, but there always is enough money for pay far MORE money for a ramshackle cobbled together private insurance system that costs the US twice as much and delivers half as good results as socialized health care systems, PLUS a bloated military that seemingly drags us into stupid wars it cant manage to win in order to justify it's existence.

Funny how we can't afford the cheaper and more effective thing, but we CAN afford the more expensive, less effective option that makes zillionaires richer. Funny that good old American can't do it spirit!
Zmaj (215 D(B))
09 May 17 UTC
Yeah, Ogion, it's a conspiracy. We're millionaires in disguise.
Ogion (3882 D)
09 May 17 UTC
(+1)
The representatives who vote for this crap sure are. The folks who vote for them are easily duped into shoveling their money into millionaires' pocket as soon as politicians yell "socialism!" It isn't that you're millionaires, it's that your idiots and easy marks
JamesYanik (548 D)
10 May 17 UTC
@Ogion

"oh, there's not enough money to pay for socialized health care,"

universality, affordability, quality. choose 2. money isn't the problem until you want all three. morals is the main problem here

"but there always is enough money for pay far MORE money for a ramshackle cobbled together private insurance system that costs the US twice as much and delivers half as good results as socialized health care systems,"

i've been over this. we have the majority of drug creators, and no price caps. european countries take the drugs we invent and sell them in generic brands to cut prices.

but you know what? set price caps on our drugs. if we do it right, then our private health insurance system will work fine, and Europe will take a huge blow. watch your socialist regimes fall under the financial burdens they already possess.

"PLUS a bloated military that seemingly drags us into stupid wars it cant manage to win in order to justify it's existence."

military is 16% of budget, social security and health services is nearly 50% PLUS we fund dozens of countries' national defenses. so i agree, let's stop helping these countries, back out, save some money and all will be well.

"Funny how we can't afford the cheaper and more effective thing,"

WHAT? WHAT? NHS is not more effective than the US system, they have tons more people dying of EASY diseases like Pneumonia and basic health problems. these countries all have significantly longer wait times, there are panels that decide whether or not a surgery is too expensive and if they simply shouldn't allow it, the NHS has had multiple allegations of discriminating against the elderly, there are signs in british hospitals telling people if they don't think the sickness is too serious then go home.

christ i almost hesitate to ask... what does a socialist perceive as INeffective????

"but we CAN afford the more expensive, less effective option that makes zillionaires richer. Funny that good old American can't do it spirit!"

and allows countries with socialized healthcare to stay afloat. why don't we try making drugs cheaper? temporary drug ceilings along with drug deregulation, trying to spur some competition in the market? no? ignore economics and go full socialist?

ah what's the use of arguing


"The representatives who vote for this crap sure are."

like that dang Bernie guy.

"The folks who vote for them are easily duped into shoveling their money into millionaires' pocket as soon as politicians yell "socialism!" It isn't that you're millionaires, it's that your idiots and easy marks"

THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED WITH BERNIE OMFG I AM DYING RIGHT NOW YOU ARE SOOOOOOOO BLIND HOLY SHIT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
SamWest (100 D)
10 May 17 UTC
^^ someone isn't mad
JamesYanik (548 D)
10 May 17 UTC
did you go back and read my earlier argument about drug costs and how pharmaceutical companies operate? i suggest you read that, otherwise what i JUST posted may seem a tad funky out of context
Hauta (1618 D(S))
10 May 17 UTC
The drug companies seem to be rushing drugs to market without comprehensive testing. Apparently, 1/3 of new drugs have safety concerns raised AFTER receiving FDA approval. Should there be even less regulation so that they can cut their development costs further and raise their profits more?

http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2017/05/09/One-in-three-drugs-have-safety-concerns-after-FDA-approval/2261494360247/
JamesYanik (548 D)
10 May 17 UTC
@Hauta

it depends drug to drug. many drugs can take up to 12 years to clear, some much less.

in any case, the fact that the FDA is letting 1/3 of bad drugs slip onto market tells you all you need to know about government efficiency.

now, i'm going to have to rehash all this but i also want changes in current legal statues. i want stricter punishments for putting bad drugs out onto the market. right now there are legal loopholes that allow them to get away with so much (check Hillary's pharma campaign contributions btw)

so you take away their safety net, and they'll be afraid to fall. i'm fine with temporary price ceilings so this isn't profit incentivized:

also, it's important to realize many pharmaceutical executives DON'T want deregulation. this is for a series of reasons:

1. they can justify abnormally high prices
2. they can wipe out smaller competition
3. they're more liable, and less likely to be able to afford insurance

http://fortune.com/2017/03/13/trump-fda-regulation-pharma/

the FDA has many genuine purposes and functions, but by having the FDA do much of the drug testing itself, Pharmaceutical companies can sit back and let tax dollars see if they made any mistakes. it also makes them less likely to search for side effects.
JamesYanik (548 D)
10 May 17 UTC
@hauta

thanks for raising a legitimate point of concern. at the end of the day, i'm fine with regulation, i just don't want it to be a MASSIVE burden to small companies, and i want it to be Smart, Efficient, and Incorruptible.

rarely do we even see one of those three in government
JamesYanik (548 D)
10 May 17 UTC
number 3. should be they're LESS liable, than if the FDA hadn't cleared the drug.
Ogion (3882 D)
10 May 17 UTC
after all, what's a few dead kids from bad drugs? after all, will no one remember the sanctity of life... err, I mean profits?
JamesYanik (548 D)
10 May 17 UTC
@Ogion

well right now we're working at 33% capacity for letting bad drugs through. why not super-regulate the industry, drive up prices, and then no kids will die from bad drugs?

of course, some kids won't be able to afford drugs then. oh dear. almost like you're discriminating agains the poor.

but then we'll socialize health care! and with regulations and costs, and taxes needed to pay for it, we'll all be poor! but don't worry, we'll still get our healthcare, even if it is out of date, and also if the elderly have to get the short end of the stick.


but if we make these companies more liable for their actions, then they'll be more careful about the drugs they put out. 1/3 of the drugs the FDA LET'S THROUGH are BAD.

i wonder how many total that would make? sounds like the pharmaceutical companies are getting lazy and the government is having to pick up the slack. i don't like giving advantages to large corporations, do you?


don't attack symptoms of a problem, attack the disease. the plague of unaffordable healthcare is only solved by making it affordable.

regardless of whether or not we go single payer, we can only get cheaper drugs, if we make it less expensive to make drugs. end. of. story.

set price ceilings, deregulate, create extreme liability, and let the market competition flourish.

you'll be getting cheap drugs flying out of your ass, and suppositories to put them right back in

Page 7 of 11
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

323 replies
brainbomb (290 D)
11 May 17 UTC
Lies and Forgiveness
What is the limit you can tolerate in a diplomacy game regarding lies? How many times can someone lie to you before all trust is gone? Ive noticed superior players ask more questions and try to get people to talk more as-a way of sorting out who is "avoiding having to lie". A great many players avoid lying by simply not replying in time or not replying fully.
1 reply
Open
ND (879 D)
11 May 17 UTC
Commission on Election Integrity
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/05/11/presidential-executive-order-establishment-presidential-advisory
12 replies
Open
Hauta (1618 D(S))
10 May 17 UTC
Is anyone in a better position than Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan to stop this?
Why is talking points memo the only site that has even mentioned that Mitch McConnell is the one guy who can stop Trump's abuse? McConnell seems to get a free pass from the media, both the left and the right.
20 replies
Open
Hauta (1618 D(S))
09 May 17 UTC
Jared Kushner for FBI Director?
Comey is out. Maybe Kushner can clean up the FBI!
26 replies
Open
Hauta (1618 D(S))
03 May 17 UTC
Is Sally Yates a drug-addled partisan whore?
Just getting a jump on the Republicans. Surely, she participated in drug fueled orgies with Hillary down in the basement of Comet Pizza, right? I mean, who else would Hillary party with?
41 replies
Open
Page 1376 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top