So we need Eden or semck to vote on my proposal, right?

2 more votes for each?

i wonder what cunning plan this is jamie.

Oh sorry, Eden voted against. Who has not voted on the proposal, other than semck?

or guak

guak

yay on Jamiet's pointz proposa, yay on SD's amendment to make my rule pointz instead of points

Also rule proposal: use yay instead of aye for approving votes. Because yay is more fun

well, actually guak's proposal already got passed and is thus active. the term "points" doesn't mean anything yet though.
1. No dice rolling.
2. First player to accumulate *exactly* 500 nomic pointz wins
3. The winner can only win on a BST weekday.
4. The current players are to be tracked.
5. All proposed new rules, proposed rule changes, or proposed rule deletions require a simple majority (more than half) of those playing, in order to pass - with the proposer automatically presumed to vote in favour unless they state otherwise.
6. Current Players are referred to as Nomic Members.
7. game isn't turn-based.
8. To be a Nomic Member, new players must have backing by at least one Nomic Member.
9. Each Nomic Member may only propose one rule change / amendment / deletion per hour.
10. any rule proposal that has not passed or been rejected within 24 hours of being suggested becomes rejected automatically.
11. Only one rule proposal may be open for consideration at any one time. Once a rule proposal has been made, voting on that proposal must be concluded before any other proposal can be made.
12. points can be accumulated through +1s on this thread.

guak, you can't vote on my amendment yet, we need to sort out Jamie's first, and you can't suggest a rule right now.

sorry guak, under rule 11 you can't make that proposal right now.
jamiet: All Nomic Members whose username does not start with a capital letter gain 50 nomic pointz (aye: jamiet, ag, kasi, guak. nay: socrates, pe, atrum)

actually, you can vote on my amendment still, the rule is only against other rule proposals it seems. so my amendment has aye's from soc, kasi, jamie and guak

Sorry, I thought my vote sorted that one out.

i don't think so. since it isn't "open for consideration", guak can't vote for it atm.

i think any number of 'amendments' can be open at any time, as long as we don't violate the 1 an hour rule for each person? rule 11 only mentions rules?

oh yeah, missed that. you're right. we're still missing one person voting for your amendment though.

I agree with Soc. 11 only mentions rule proposals, it does not include amendments

that is sadly true.

ag, atrum, pe or semck could all help us out here.

So, I propose to amend rule #5 so that it reads as:

All proposed new rules, proposed rule changes, or proposed rule deletions require a that more than half of those playing vote 'yay', in order to pass - with the proposer automatically presumed to vote 'yay', unless they state otherwise.

(Could you please restate what the amendment up for consideration is?)

Correction:

So, I propose to amend rule #5 so that it reads as:

All proposed new rules, proposed rule changes, or proposed rule deletions require that more than half of those playing vote 'yay', in order to pass - with the proposer automatically presumed to vote 'yay', unless they state otherwise.

atrum, i propose to change rule 12 to nomic pointz, not nomic points

to change rule 12 to read as pointz instead of points

*i proposed* not current new proposal, so my ability to propose another amendment isn't limited.

guak can't propose for another hour now.

amendment to change "rule proposal" in rule 11 to "rule proposal and rule change proposal". otherwise we could change a rule to a completely new one even if there is an active proposal, thus making rule 11 obsolete.

kasi's amendment: aye: kasi. nay: soc

aye to the ammendment

I vote nay to kasi's amendment.