@Ogion
"James Yanik: ptretend white supremacists aren't dangerous:
"some white guy in a street yelling f*** the blacks, while offensive, is less dangerous than laws, that if tyrannical in nature, could end up in armed men with guns, knocking down your door and dragging you to prison."
Yeah the white supremacist could fucking murder you and your whole family"
no, i was referring to the SPEECH. the actual action of hi talking is not dangerous. you are adding in things i have not said. the individual person could be VERY dangerous.
"Oh and here is James Yanik claiming there is no basis for thinking white supremacists are dangerous, because of course they're such sweet people
"you have no basis to say that the supremacists would act violently if not faced with non violent protestors. you have no evidence of this. you have not sourced this. you have not quoted a member of the white nationalists saying this."""
this is also false, I never said they weren't dangerous, I simply said you have no evidence that they'd act violently if unprovoked AT THIS ONE SPECIFIC RALLY. when I saw "the supremacists" I was talking about only in charlottesville, but you've cropped what i said out of context.
in fact, the only evidence you offered to the contrary was one of the guys saying that (paraphrase) 'there was a market for violence and they were meeting it.' sorry, but that sounds like the alt-right were expecting violence
"Yeah. Anyone paying any attention knows damn well they came prepared to do violence and that's exactly what they did. Of course James is parroting what he read on Daily stormer in saying that the poor little Nazis just were defending themselves "
they came with weapons yes, but whether or not they'd use them is dependent on
1. number of police
2. the amount of violence in the protesting group
3. the different areas they were allowed to go to
and many other things. my primary point here is that having antifa present DID NOT HELP
"I don't have time to pull any of your other quotes minimizing how violent and vicious these people are. Nor do I care."
you obviously don't care since you're misrepresenting me
"And of course he quotes the cops saying "people fought with each other" and interprets that to means "antifa attacked Nazis" which isn't what is said at all"
I NEVER said that, it simply means that it wasn't ONLY the neonazis aggressing on antifa. there were many reports on antifa being the aggressors as well. I am saying BOTH SIDES FOUGHT ONE ANOTHER
"And of course these are the folks who themselves like to shoot black people and stood aside and watched those the neo Nazis attacked
Folks like these guys:
http://abc7news.com/news/sf-cops-under-investigation-for-racist-homophobic-texts/558846/"
a few cops in california from 5 years ago? HOW RELEVANT IS THIS????
"Or my personal favorite, the cop who posted video of counter protestors getting murdered and run over saying "hahahaha! I love this!"
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/08/15/massachusetts-police-officer-under-investigation-after-defending-charlottesville-white-supremacist-rally/23078401/
It hasn't occurred to you that given how often cops lie, that's not exactly a credible source?
Yeah. Cops don't have any credibility issues at all. Nope"
so once second you're using the cops' quote to prove me wrong... but now NONE of the cops are trustworthy because of one guy? that makes no sense
"Here is a clue
Racist shit isn't funny. It isn't a joke. And no one is getting a free pass anymore. Come even close to defending racist and we will stupid those words right back down your throat. Your plausible deniability is being shredded"
zero substance to this comment. skip.
"(And you sure did advocate violence. You said that violence was ok to keep people fro taking away guns. Protecting people of color from being castrated, disemboweled, hanged and burned alive not so much. But yeah, in response to taxes or taking guns? Totally justified. "
THIS IS A LIE. I have massive problems with those things happening, except NONE OF THAT HAPPENED HERE. i react to specific individual perpetuating certain acts of violence. so does the law. none of that happened at charlottesville. one guy ran over protestors with his car. meanwhile the other two sides were engaging in violence, both attacking one another. i am not trying to draw a moral equivalency here, i'mm simply stating the truth
"Having said that the revolution was justified, you now have to explain why non lethal violence against members of organizations that commit terrorism and atrocities is somehow beyond the pale"
1. because one is being perpetuated by a government, and the other are individuals not a part of government
2. if THAT is terrorism, then BLM is a terrorist organization. the Dallas sniper openly support BLM, many BLM supporters supported Micah Johnson, and the official leaders of the BLM denounced him.
the same has happened here, the heads of the alt right denounced the guy, but some of their supporters support him, and he supported the alt right
"I think the only way you can is to play down racists violence. Well, playing down racist violence the way so many Americans do is why people took up the chant "black lives matter" because so damn white Americans act as if they don't understand or believe that.
Make excuses, and yeah I'm calling you out. You ain't going to be able to hide, boy."
And I'm reporting you to the mods for continued lies about me. This started back on sunday and i have 3 separate accounts of character defamation. this has gone far enough