The last process time was over 12 minutes ago (at 07:21 PM UTC); the server is not processing games until the cause is found and games are given extra time.

Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 721 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Winterreise (371 D)
16 Mar 11 UTC
Need 7th Player
Hey everyone,
We need a 7th player for a private game. Our 7th isn't able to join.
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=53435
Password:cobracobra
1 reply
Open
cremdelacrem (229 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
juanjo and 2229 metagaming ?
Suspected metagaming
44 replies
Open
Kensington (843 D)
15 Mar 11 UTC
Technical Issues in World Diplomacy Game
In http://www.webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=47406 it appears that the convoy feature is broken. Of the 4 players left in the game, 3 of us encounter errors when we try to submit orders to convoy a unit and are unable to access the feature.

Is there a way to repair this without breaking the game?
3 replies
Open
SacredDigits (102 D)
15 Mar 11 UTC
Explain why these moves work
Germany: F Sweden to Norway, A STP S F Sweden to Norway, F GoB to Sweden.
England: F Norway to Sweden (fail) (dislodged)

There was other stuff happening too, but the relevant question is: why did GoB succeed in getting to Sweden if Norway was going there too?
27 replies
Open
Frickin'Zeus (85 D)
16 Mar 11 UTC
World Gunboat
World map, wta, gunboat, anon. 2days/phase
I think we had 11 people last time, so only a few more to get it started this time around.
gameID=53595
0 replies
Open
ArmchairGeneral (148 D)
16 Mar 11 UTC
Question about game mechanics
What does the cancel button do? Does that allow me to quit a game and what happens to my country if I quit?
6 replies
Open
Haert (234 D)
15 Mar 11 UTC
Poor form player
Details to come later but a certian player just refused to draw/cancel the game when his neighbor went into CD in the first year while all the other players voted for Draw/Cancel
16 replies
Open
asksuperuser (100 D)
15 Mar 11 UTC
I don't even understand how to play :)
Hi Guys sorry if I'm an idiot but I read the rules, join a game and now I'm stuck because I don't even understand what I should do as first action.

I just click on draw button and now what :)
6 replies
Open
Sargmacher (0 DX)
15 Mar 11 UTC
Jumbo and Memilio BANNED
Thank you, finally! I had seen this coming ages ago and avoided his games. Trip and I had had a good private discussion about this one. He has just, presumably also been banned from a 200 D game, he was clearly building up points with Memilio, his other account.

Jumbo: userID=32275
Memilio: userID=32115
20 replies
Open
peterwiggin (15158 D)
07 Jan 11 UTC
SoW Winter 2011 Undergrad 1 Discussion
gameID=46236
Please follow the rules, which I will post shortly.
169 replies
Open
orathaic (1009 D(B))
15 Mar 11 UTC
why does everybody fail?
i've tried...
14 replies
Open
TURIEL (205 D)
15 Mar 11 UTC
Live Game Players needed. Start in 1 hour. :)
board.php?gameID=53549
2 replies
Open
trip (696 D(B))
08 Mar 11 UTC
1000pts the Easy Way, by Norman Oak
35 replies
Open
yebellz (729 D(G))
15 Mar 11 UTC
Recruiting for 1-day phase, PW protected gunboat.
Gunboat, semi-anon, 1-day phase
Looking for quality players that don't CD. Password protected game. Details inside
8 replies
Open
Dave McBride (107 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
need a new player for Metro Wargamers
I need to bow out, and the players need a replacement. The game hasn't started yet. Six are in, and ready to go.
10 replies
Open
djbent (2572 D(S))
14 Mar 11 UTC
Chatty Cathies
hey all sorry for having to cancel. hope you get another game going, i guess babies and Diplomacy aren't as compatible as i thought! :(
10 replies
Open
Frank (100 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
EOG Every Time I see Bablyon, My Blood Runs Cold
7 replies
Open
woofers (100 D)
15 Mar 11 UTC
Cheater!
frankfitzer in gameID=105443 is quite obviously cheating!
I would like this game cancelled and frankfitzer banned along with all those who do not follow the rules of the game and the site forum!

It is terrible that someone would register at this site and not follow forum and game rules, they just ruin the experience for everyone!
9 replies
Open
Mujus (1495 D(B))
13 Mar 11 UTC
The Prince
Quotations taken from gradesaver.com....

Our friend Niccolo M. says that there are two possible power bases for a prince: the nobility, and the common people. But he goes on to say the following: “In fact the aim of the common people is more honest than that of the nobles, since the nobles want to oppress others, while the people simply want not to be oppressed.”
26 replies
Open
fulhamish (4134 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
is this cheating
This message was made in the Global forumn by France is it cheating? I make no accusations just ask the question: ''look, i dont know what is your fucking problem?, i always play with my brohter (England), and sometimes we help each other'' Game name is YOSHI!
62 replies
Open
yebellz (729 D(G))
13 Mar 11 UTC
Cheaters are Pathetic
Pathetic and illogical, but mostly just pathetic.
The only shame is that they waste the time of the rest of the community.
Page 2 of 3
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
Sargmacher (0 DX)
13 Mar 11 UTC
;)
mapleleaf (0 DX)
13 Mar 11 UTC
@ thatonekid - Get it right.

It's name is Fag-Naur.
thatonekid (0 DX)
13 Mar 11 UTC
watching this circle jerk yall have going is kind of comedic
Draugnar (0 DX)
13 Mar 11 UTC
As I said in the other thread, mapleleaf is free to insult me but I won't be returning them.
B-Boy-Ezthetik (100 D)
13 Mar 11 UTC
Wow, reading this is a waste of time. How am I going to get my time back now?! I think all of you should be banned to compensate me : ).
trip (696 D(B))
13 Mar 11 UTC
@ B-Boy: You still owe time for quitting on four players. That you lost out on taking part in the draw because of it is hilarious though. Nice play.
B-Boy-Ezthetik (100 D)
13 Mar 11 UTC
I got absolutely demolished, unsure how I was still alive but what ever. I voted on a draw and then decided not to waste my time. Not sure I understand what you mean in the second sentence...
Draugnar (0 DX)
14 Mar 11 UTC
So you admit to being a low life quiter, barely one step above a meta/multi cheater. Guess who just made my blacklist for quiting and ruining games for others.
B-Boy-Ezthetik (100 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
Bahaha guess who made my blacklist for saying things that I couldn't care any less about?
Draugnar (0 DX)
14 Mar 11 UTC
Please keep me on there so I never have to kick your whiny quitting a
Draugnar (0 DX)
14 Mar 11 UTC
Fuck. Stupid phone.

Please keep me on there so I never have to kick your whiny quitting ass in game.
SacredDigits (102 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
I'm kind of wondering on this because I'm in an anon game where there's been 3 CD's so far, and each one I've been kind of the kiss of death. I head that way, they lose a center, they CD. So any time a high CD player gets raked across the coals, it makes me wonder...is this person one of the jerks that made me lose pretty much all satisfaction in what otherwise would have been a pretty great game?
B-Boy-Ezthetik (100 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
You're funny Draugnar.
kislikd (840 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
1. The internet is a place for both fact and opinion.

2. Since no one can stop me, and because everyone else can't stop themselves - I grant myself the right to share my opinion.

3. My opinion: people who worry about cheating to the extent that I see on this site are lame.

4. Corollary: most of the arguments against cheating have to deal with either the rules of the site or use logic backed up by "people who need to cheat on the internet are lame (insert reason why here)."

5. Conclusion: Rules can and should be changed to reflect a change in the society governed by them. And: People who get so worked up about cheaters online should realize that they are accomplishing just as much as the cheaters themselves; perhaps less.

6. Let the flame-fest begin anew.
Draugnar (0 DX)
14 Mar 11 UTC
@kislikd - I'm confused... Are you somehow saying it's OK to cheat? Or are you saying that our time and energy is worth nothing - time and energy spent improving our position in the annals of Diplomacy (specifically the GR rankings as well as recognition throughout the entire Diplomacy community which has a long history and is far greater than this site). Would you say that to a chess grandmaster if he caught an opponent using a blackberry to consult with a computer system on his next moves or to a poker player who caught his opponent with extra cards up his sleeves?

Seriously, please clarify why we shouldn't be concerned with cheaters. I value my time and want to enjoy it as much as possible. I also value my ranking in the GR and my reputation as a reasonably decent player (not the greatest by far, but able to hold my own for the most part). Are you saying, therefore, my time is worth nothing?
kislikd (840 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
First off, I'm concerned with people misinterpreting and then misrepresenting what I say.

Secondly, and to answer your question, pick your battles. If this were the deciding match between potential Grand Masters of chess, of course I would not condone cheating. That is just dumb. But you are not a Grand Master, nor is this a worldwide title match, nor is it even anything more important than a game to be played.

I'm happy for you that you found something you think is worthwhile to put your time and energy into. I do that daily with my music and hockey, and I will not scoff at someone else for pursuing a passion. That being said, I feel as if the rules are read with the intensity of a Constitutional Literalist with blinders on. No I don't think we should allow cheating, but I think it's high time we re-evaluated what the hell that word means on this site. When the rules become as much a burden as the thing they are trying to prevent or protect, it's time to look at them anew and make changes as necessary. And I do think that if everyone is to continue on the path of blindly following things as they are, you do more hurt to the people who tried to create rankings, rules, and regulations in the first place. You don't honor someone by following his exact words, you honor him by understanding the intent and meaning behind those words, and acting on that.

So, if you are serious about preventing cheating, then I suggest you and anyone else interested as well as a few who aren't group together to actually EXAMINE and DEBATE the rules.

So in summation, yelling on the forums about cheating gets nowhere, and does more to undermine the legitimacy of any sort of rule-structure than it does to help prevent cheating.
Draugnar (0 DX)
14 Mar 11 UTC
If only you knew how uninformed your pontification showed you to be... The discussion took place and takes place periodically (like now) only to have the same four decisions: don't post cheating accusations on the forum, don't discuss ongoing games (especially gunboats) even if you aren't involved in said game, the forum is a self-moderating forum as the mods are volunteers and have neither the time or desire to moderate the forums, and this is an adult forum so language is allowed. These decisions have the support and backing of the mods.

Now let's say I came and played hockey with you and my entire team formed a human pyramid in front of the net forcing the game to draw or maybe we got lucky and scored against you once then did our pyramid so you had no chance of getting a goal. Would you not feel like we were wasting your time and mocking your dedication? Well some of us feel that way here. I have been playing Diplomacy since the late 70s. It is more than just a time killer for me. And I'm not the only one. So for you to adopt the "it's just a game" attitude is insulting to me. Hockey is also just a game but I respect your dedication to it and would appreciate the same in return.
mr.crispy (0 DX)
14 Mar 11 UTC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tdsL4kvp_I&NR=1
SacredDigits (102 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
Nothing is worse than CD's (especially ones obviously done for the express reason of "I'm losing") ruining a game that was supposed to be fun. Take for example this game.

gameID=48993

It was advertised on the forum as a silly game that we were all supposed to joke around with "stereotypical accents" for the countries, and I put on my best Colonel Klink as Germany. England and Austria also were good with the accents, and while Russia and Turkey weren't really sure what to do, they made some effort. The first CD came when England and I cracked France wide open, and was clearly done because he was losing. Then when we turned on Russia we got some whining via press about England "letting" Germany win, and then he CD'ed with a bunch of centers left. Then Italy, our other target, started filling in orders less and less often until he too CD'ed.

At this point, Turkey had been screwed by Russia and Italy before their CD's to a point where he couldn't take advantage of the situation, and England was Far Away, so I was the one that was able to make huge gains. I told England the situation left a bad taste in my mouth, and he, to his extreme credit, told me to play it out and get the win rather than settle for a draw, since he felt I probably would have won regardless.

The true hero of this game was Turkey, who despite being in a position that more or less guaranteed he'd be stuck at two centers never stopped filling in orders.

I mean, you wouldn't skate off the ice if the other team was up by six goals (and there was no mercy rule), would you? And this game was 36 hour turns...I can't be convinced that anyone wouldn't be able to hit one order every three days (because it's two phases to CD).

Granted, CD'ing isn't cheating per se, but it is cheating me and England (in that game) out of knowing what would have happened if he'd had some back-up when he hit his stab (Italy CD'ed for good right after that).
kislikd (840 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
Drag, if you built a pyramid in front of the net, I'd just crash into you guys :)

That's the difference - I am looking for a fun, happy, and successful route to solving a problem, instead of all the moaning that goes on here. Yeah it sucks when people cheat, and it sucks when people CD too (thanks Digits), but you don't run, and you don't cry. You beat them or you go down trying, and then you choose not to play with them anymore.

Also, you illustrated my other point - nothing ever changes here. The same four rules as you stated are just reaffirmed time and time again. I have already come up with a few changes or clarifications that I would want to see, but I also don't care as much as you do, so I don't consider it my place to come in with new ideas and rock the boat. Still, I know you care and that's great - but the way you show it turns me off from the game. Sorry if I just don't appreciate it.
kislikd (840 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
Oh, and here's a great example: I was playing up in front of the net, and a guy who is a much much better skater and player than me came up behind me, and jokingly, put his hand in my face and held my head. I couldn't see and I damn well couldn't make a play, and if there were refs (this is a self-moderated pick up league - how convenient for these parallels!) he would have gotten two minutes instantly. Still, after that we spent the rest of the game shoving each other around and I decided to not worry about the fact that he was cheating, or being annoying - rather I decided to have fun with it. I checked him a few times and learned how to take and give them instead of trying to play as normally and getting screwed by him every time. I adapted my play to the situation. (When he started trying to get me to drop the gloves I said "you gotta be kidding me - right after your gloves hit the ice, my head will too!" There is the pick your battles thing again)

Anyway, it was a fun game even though we played less real hockey than normal, but that's not a bad thing. Adapt, problem solve, and don't sweat it.
gigantor (404 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
kislikd, if you have new ideas, you can throw them out there, rather than complain that nothing ever changes. I, for one, would appreciate some new ideas. As for 'crashing into the pyramid', you can't really find a fun and happy route to solve the problem of a multi (who is not completely stupid). And for those of us who sometimes like to join anonymous open games on a whim, it's impossible to just choose not to play with cheaters. The only way is to make sure everyone knows the rules, and enforce them. I don't want to spend three hours in a night (or many more over the space of a few months) to find that my game has been ruined by a multi, a metagamer or even a bad sport. It's not what I'm on this site to do.
Draugnar (0 DX)
14 Mar 11 UTC
I don't have a problem with new ideas either. Let's discuss them. As for your pickup hockey analogy. How would you feel if one third of the opposing team were cheating with high sticking and what not. A multi is one third of your opponents at a minimum and usually more.
I think the point, Draugner, is more about the fact that you don't do anything to prevent cheating. All you do is post annoying things in the forums and complain a bunch but really make no attempt to improve the site yourself.
Draugnar (0 DX)
14 Mar 11 UTC
How do you mean? I'm not a mod and I have turned in plenty of cheaters both in games I'm I'm and in ones I happen to discover. I just don't bring the accusations here and I abide by the mods wishes in that regard.
That's not at all what i meant. We can all follow the procedures that we have laid out in front of us. What we do now neither stops cheaters nor effectively catches them all. Our friend kislikd is challenging us to find a new way to deal with problems. To improve our site through innovations achieved through productive discussions.

Draugnar, you do a great job of pointing out the things that everyone who reads the forum already knows. We need to find a way for you to use your energy in a way that is not only productive but also no longer annoying.
Jamiet99uk (873 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
@ Lando: The problem is that it's clear not everyone knows the things you claim "everyone who reads the forum already knows". If n00bs and people who should know better didn't keep creating threads accusing others of cheating, the likes of Draugnar and myself wouldn't have to keep shouting "DON'T POST CHEATING ACCUSATIONS ON THE FORUM" at them. Ditto for idiots who attempt to discuss ongoing gunboats.

The very fact that Draugnar keeps pointing these rules out solidly demonstrates the fact that someone needs to keep pointing them out.
But it also demonstrates that this approach is not working. It is apparent that not everyone can be reached through the medium of the forum. The two of you have exhausted this campaign and we need to find alternative ways to promote your message.
Sargmacher (0 DX)
14 Mar 11 UTC
Have Draugnar record "DONT POST CHEATING ACCUSATIONS YOU FUCKING ASSHAT FUCKING SHITBAGS" as an audio file and then voicemail it to everyone's email address.
Sargmacher (0 DX)
14 Mar 11 UTC
But, joking aside, I totally agree with Lando. People don't know in advance not to do these things and a new strategy could be developed to address that.

"We need to find a way for you to use your energy in a way that is not only productive but [...] no longer annoying."

Page 2 of 3
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

76 replies
Spryboy (103 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
March Madness.
Probaly not everyone here follows college basketball, but for those who do, what do you guys have in your brackets? Anything interesting?
I have ODU winning it. :P
14 replies
Open
bartdogg42 (1285 D)
09 Mar 11 UTC
Need someone to take over Greece
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=48148#gamePanel

And Egypt to show some stinking stalemate etiquette.
220 replies
Open
principians (881 D)
12 Mar 11 UTC
any mathematician?
any mathematician knowing something about continuum theory, or just any abstarct mathematician around here?
just curiosity
19 replies
Open
thecools (100 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
my game
join the old way (again) 7 man classic bored good taimes live game 10 mins pre phase
0 replies
Open
dD_ShockTrooper (1199 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
So I join a regular game...
Only to find out that the guy who created it "made a mistake" and openly announced that he is going to CD because he "didn't have enough time" to continue.
4 replies
Open
trip (696 D(B))
11 Mar 11 UTC
4 days /phase
gameID=53126
pm for password
9 replies
Open
bobulix (132 D)
14 Mar 11 UTC
Is the game cancelled if multi-user is convicted?
Or how shall I proceed if I don't want to loose the game. There's multis but playing so bad I'd rather beat them :o)
5 replies
Open
basvanopheusden (2176 D)
13 Mar 11 UTC
Can the Subaltern speak? EOG
30 replies
Open
gigantor (404 D)
10 Mar 11 UTC
Olidip: Chaoctopi variant.
Shameless advertising, but we need 34 players for this to go ahead. Join up, people!
http://vdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=846
9 replies
Open
Page 721 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top