I find that NPR has an obvious liberal bias, and I use the word ‘liberal’ here, which I usually avoid, deliberately. They don't have a *partisan* bias; they're scrupulously neutral, and you can mostly trust them on the facts. (If anything, I find they leave out more anti-corporation facts than anything else, but that's just an impression that I haven't thought through very carefully.) But when they go into commentary, especially when you move from the reporting shows like All Things Considered to the discussion shows like Fresh Air, then you can tell (or at least I can tell) that almost everybody thre views things from a liberal perspective.
Call it academic if you like, but then read this:
http://chronicle.com/article/Taking-the-Right-Seriously/48333/
This is from another publication that I think has a liberal bias (but this opinion piece is an exception) and which obviously has an academic bias. If the only thing that you've heard about ‘liberal bias’ in academia is from the likes of Glenn Beck (or even Thomas Sowell), then you will find this a great change, even if you disagree with it.
I don't think that NPR is at all aware of their liberal bias. (If they were, then they would probably correct for it, since I think that they do strive to be intellectually honest.) Just like Acosmist is not at all aware that he sounds like a complete nutter.
@ Timmi88:
>a feminist, atheist, unitarian universalist, and gay rights supporter that lives in the "bible belt" in Mississippi
You have my sympathies! I am also a feminist, atheist, UU, and gay rights supporter, but it's all right in Nebraska (the university town, Lincoln, not the western ranching areas) where we are outnumbered but do have friends. (To be honest, I no longer live in Nebraska, nor do I have the same political opinions now as I had then, although I still fit into all of the categories listed.)