Call it what you like, just use it. What is this, ancient Rome?

why do i need to use it can you not read without it

It's much easier to read with it. Come on, it's not like I'm asking for a kidney.

in the two instances I noticed punctuation missing, they were question marks, not periods. BTW, what's a "full stop"? Isn't that for telegraphs or Morse code or something?

"full stop" is the correct word for what people in the colonies call a "period".

yeah a period is something completely different :p

My, my, TheGhostmaker, was that a hint of imperial snobbishness we just witnessed there?

:P

Sent from: Centurian (69 ) Sent: Mon 10 PM
Clearly you don't know alot about the IRA. They showed a general humanity to their attacks that was not evident in those of Al-Qaeda.
===========================================
mmmmm as I recall and I am old enough to remember most of the troubles as they were called, there were occassions were a warning was given beforehand so that crowds would be ushered into the area where a bomb was about to explode. I also recall, (although i was very young) the Birmingham pub bombings which targetted innocents on a night out. I really can't see how this could be discribed as "humane". Could I ask where you are from Centurian?

I agree with you Maniac and I notice from elsewhere that Centurian is nowhere near old enough to remember any of the troubles. There were many false warnings, which were mainly to cause chaos and disruptions. The IRA were certainly not humane when they burst into a Protestant church and opened fire on the congregation. On the positive side the IRA were not just a terrorist organisation. They did an excellent job in policing catholic estates in Northern Ireland. Teenage thugs would end up losing their kneecaps.

Al-Qaeda is an artificial construct. it's arabic slang for the toilet. The CIA caught the bin laden family's accountant, who was running from them for embezzling 11 million dollars, and got him to testify that Al-Qaeda was an international terror network and that Osama bin Laden was the leader of it.

I know a guy who was ONI anti-terror analyst from 1997 until 2002, he can tell you all about islamic jihad and hezzbollah and tamil tigers but Al-Qaeda? never fucking heard of them

Are you serious? This takes the cake, Biff.

he does have a point kind of, but al qaeda were/are an american created problem

say what you wish invictus, but georgetown graduate ex ONI terror analyst has more pull with me when it comes to Al-Qaeda than some right wing FOX news watching high schooler

He's saying they don't exist, that it's just a construct to incriminate Bin Laden. But why would we want him if he weren't a terrorist financier?

It's lunacy.

I'm not saying he's not a terrorist. or a terrorist financier. I'm saying he's not the leader of an international terrorist organization.

beyond the shadow of a doubt.

ok well that is bollocks that they dont exist, but i do think its not as simple as the news networks make out, and i do think that the fall out from 9-11 has made al queda worse by people doing things in its name

Unbelievable. Why does everything have to be some tottering lie with you, Sicarius?

Anyway Bin Laden is not at fault for 9-11
this is something me and your government are in agreeement with.
we also agree that Khaled sheik mohammed (I know I spelled that wrong) was the one that came up with the idea. Now, where we disagree is who actually did it.
I recommend you watch zeitgeist. it's a good starting point.

ok dude 9-11 was definitely a lie

who ever heard of a steel building collapsing because of a fire???
jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel. not even close.
I mean shit, the WTC were BUILT TO WITHSTAND BEING HIT BY A PLANE.

@invictus i do think its quite funny that both you and sicarious are so completely different and argue about everything with no middle ground

invictus why are you always so incredulous? it's like you're suprised to find someone who thinks differently than you and disagrees with your government

That's it! 9-11 conspiracies are an insult to all the Americans who lost their lives on that day. You've said some offensive things before, but this is disgusting. Of course it wasn't planned out step-by-step by bin Laden personally, or any one person alone.

What you're saying is so, so errant I'm apoplectic here. I can't see how that's a credible way to look at the world. You're nuts!

oh dude thats not offensive at all. if I was trying to be offensive I probably wouldve said....

hey whats black and gray and looks great on 1000 cops?

world trade centers.

see thats an insult to the americans that lost their lives. but foolishly and blindly believing what the government tells you without looking into it or even being open to different possibilities is ridiculous. you are very very close minded.
you're not even willing to accept the possibility.
even thought the evidence very very clearly supports that an airplane did not cause the trade centers to collapse

isnt a better definition of nuts just listening to what the news and the government says without researching things yourself?

trims right.
you give me proof that 9-11 was NOT the government?

hahahaha i like that joke

Oh God. Are you actually saying I'm wrong by not believing in the stupidest, most insulting, pull-the-shit-out-your-ass-throw-it-at-the-wall-to-see-what-sticks theory of all time?

Go ahead and troll up some lefty "evidence" on how Bush and the Jews and Freemasons and the Bilderberg Group and a bunch of evil rich people got together to dream up a ludicrously complicated, circuitously planned attack to serve their own ends. Just don't expect me or anyone else to swallow your nonsense. The government can barely deliver the mail and you put them behind the most intricate caper in history? Remarkable.

no i think what hes getting out is that you cant even open your mind up to the possiblity, seriously mate go watch some bill hicks it might give you a better outlook on life