it should be can't vote until 24 hours after their next post, and i think it says it that way back on page 3 or whatever, yet i'm going to withdraw my proposal and let us move on to the next one...

Very well, what's next?

semck: I propose that any rule, except this one, will after twelve hours start to accrue 10 pointz per hour for its original proposer, for as long as it remains in effect. (aye: semck, pe. nay: kasimax, ag)
kasimax: we want nice and neat bureaucracy. (aye: kasimax, ag. nay: semck, pe)
pe: This post serves as retroactive and preemptive vouching for any prospective Nomic player. (aye: Eden; nay: soc, semck, ag)

this is the queue. going top down now

so semck's one. i will vote 'aye'

I say nay to Semck's proposal

Nay on that

Can someone who is really organized repost all of the rules with all of their amendments, and all of the nomic members?? I can try to figure out how many points everyone has and post those.

I purpose that rule eleven be amended to include amendments.

Otherwise it's exploitable by just amending unrelated things to existing rules.

love the progress, fellow Nomic Members

don't even need to propose that ghug, i think we're supposed to post updated rules, it's just being bothered to do it

1. No dice rolling.
2. First player to accumulate *exactly* 500 nomic pointz wins
3. The winner can only win on a BST weekday.
4. The current players are to be tracked.
5. All proposed new rules, proposed rule changes, or proposed rule deletions require a simple majority (more than half) of those playing, in order to pass - with the proposer automatically presumed to vote in favour unless they state otherwise.
6. Current Players are referred to as Nomic Members.
7. game isn't turn-based.
8. To be a Nomic Member, new players must have backing by at least one Nomic Member.
9. Each Nomic Member may only propose one rule change / amendment / deletion per hour.
10. any rule, amendment or deletion proposal that has not passed or been rejected within 24 hours of being suggested becomes rejected automatically.
11. Only one rule proposal may be open for consideration at any one time. Once a rule proposal has been made, voting on that proposal must be concluded before any other proposal can be made. Furthermore we are resolving the open proposals by a queue, and ghug gets 10 Nomic pointz
12. nomic pointz can be accumulated through +1s on this thread.
13. all Nomic members whose username does not start with a capital letter gain 50 nomic pointz

I think that's correct. not sure.
we are also supposed to have a list of the current members (officially)
unofficially we should probably keep track of the pointz everyone has

players, unless i'm missing some, are:
kasi, jamie, pe, soc, semck, atrum, ag, guak, ghug, ezra, squigs, vashta

Okay, now that I'm caught up again (I was in a meeting all afternoon), I vote aye for Semcks current proposal on points.

semck: I propose that any rule, except this one, will after twelve hours start to accrue 10 pointz per hour for its original proposer, for as long as it remains in effect. (aye: semck, pe, atrum, soc. nay: kasimax, ag, ghug, squigs)

Nomic Pointz
ghug - 60
kasimax - 71
ezra willis - 50
ag7433 - 50
jamiet99uk - 50
semck83 - 50
guak - 52
SD - 2
Atrum - 1


Who the heck has +1'd all of kasi's posts??

And those points might be wrong, and are definitely subject to change, just a good update to see how close people are

jamie has 0!

sorry, you are right, I thought that his own rule applied to himself, but apparently not...

i don't know why he wantd to give 50 to half the people, not including himself, yet there it was

Once all of our current proposals have been cleared up, I think our biggest priority is to streamline our process of proposing and amendments and whatnot. We cant exactly do that right now though, because we cant propose anything.

At the moment, unless i'm mistaken there is an amendment being suggested to limit it to only one rule addition/change/deletion being voted on at once. however the rule is just one rule at a time. each person can only suggest one of anything per hour.

we have not established if we can queue rule suggestions or not (in general past this queueing), all we really know is that there will not be turns to suggest rules.

People should consider voting for my amendment amendment. It's a loophole that should be corrected.

I vote for ghug's amendment

And someone just went through and +1'd some posts on this page, so the points are definitely all wrong now. This is going to be hard to keep track of all the +1's on people.

@ SD and Squigs: My proposal to give 50 to certain people did *not* include me, that is correct. I am, however, not going to discuss my strategy while the game is in progress.

I vote against Semck's proposal. I believe this means it is defeated.

What's next in line?

kasimax: we want nice and neat bureaucracy. (aye: kasimax, ag. nay: semck, pe)
pe: This post serves as retroactive and preemptive vouching for any prospective Nomic player. (aye: Eden; nay: soc, semck, ag)
ghug: I purpose that rule eleven be amended to include amendments. (aye: ghug, Squigs)

And I vote nay on Kasi's proposal

ghug: I purpose that rule eleven be amended to include amendments. (aye: ghug, Squigs, ag) - I vote yes!