[ x ] muting thread
[ x ] abandon thread
[ x ] fuck that
[ x ] nope

fucking Satan black magics

elaborate? cause 1+1=2 in my book

but i can do 2+2=5

2.4+2.4=4.8
just round lol

Who verifies?

One and one make one.

boolean algebra im not listening to fyi bitches

One and One make One = Fusion!

what, you said logic.... that isnt logic

I was waiting for a 10 page mathematical thesis.

same lol

A situation in chess: There is a checkmate in eleven moves. For a Grandmaster only logical, for e.g. a Boxer a holy Sangraal. He will never understand the logic behind it, he would say: "That isn't logic, I don't understand it..."

There is a checkmate in two moves but that doesn't prove your point. How can a number, the mathematical representation of quantity, "fuse" with another number? You mean by addition? Well that make your statement either incorrect or illogical. Choose one.

Speak English, Strauss.

As long as one is a reflection?

Yeah this is really ridiculous.

depends if this is directional vector math or not.

or set theory; 1 = #({B; x ∊ B ∀ x = b}), (ie the set B where x is an element of B for all possible x when x = b) and 1 also = #({C; x ∊ C ∀ x = b})

Then with + and the Union operator, #B + #C = #(B∪C) = 1 (union being another way of saying fusion. (similar to what jmo said, if it is vector math, then you are using a different notational meaning for +)

this better not be some bullshit lead into the whole 'does 1^2=1?' debate cause im not doing area shit today

@the above -- in other words, if you redefine all the symbols to mean things they are not used to mean, then it's true.

Incredible!

(For example, you never use the symbol 1 to refer to the zero vector, and if 1 + v = 1, then v must be 0, no matter what vector "1" refers to. So, no, this is not true in a vector context).

"A situation in chess: There is a checkmate in eleven moves. For a Grandmaster only logical, for e.g. a Boxer a holy Sangraal. He will never understand the logic behind it, he would say: "That isn't logic, I don't understand it...""

http://i.imgur.com/6jkyNQg.gif

"Speak English, Strauss. "

I still learn, two years aren't enough, I know that. I speak two eastern foreign language well beside my native language. Isn't it better for people like me or maybe for wavering people to stay out of this site and come again when they have reached your claims or at least be quiet as long as? Where I live, we call destructive people like you "crypto-fascist". A pig. On the Internet the popular art form for small minds are "Spellflame"...

ok... so what the fuck does "A situation in chess: There is a checkmate in eleven moves. For a Grandmaster only logical, for e.g. a Boxer a holy Sangraal. He will never understand the logic behind it, he would say: "That isn't logic, I don't understand it..." mean

?

Booradlean

The logic is akin to this:
I have two balls of silly putty.
I smush them together.
How many balls of silly putty do I have?
One.
One ball of silly putty added to another ball of silly putty = one ball of silly putty.
Of course my new ball of silly putty is bigger than either of the original balls.
But if we are only counting the number of balls we have just produced a situation were 1+1=1

if that is supposed to be boolean i already said no to that

'Where I live, we call destructive people like you "crypto-fascist"'

Is it too early to nominate post of the year?

sorry my "is that supposed to be boolean" poat was directed to 'booradlean' but i agree with damian.

In a way it's qualitative vs quantitative