Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 1031 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Legilimens (110 D)
15 Mar 13 UTC
Bug?
Look at gameID=111572 , specifically at France's fleet in Piedmont... why is Piedmont not blue, given that it is not an SC?
2 replies
Open
hecks (164 D)
15 Mar 13 UTC
(+1)
Nice things thread
It's a gorgeous late-winter Friday in Maine. There's not a cloud in the blue, blue sky, and it may get all the way up to the high 40s today. I'm in an uncharacteristically good mood, so I decided to start this thread inviting you webdippers to be happy about something.
40 replies
Open
SYnapse (0 DX)
14 Mar 13 UTC
Political Philosophy MOOC @ Harvard
https://www.edx.org/courses/HarvardX/ER22x/2013_Spring/about

I've signed up, anyone else up for this?
55 replies
Open
krellin (80 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
Inflation
Why do government "inflation" figures always discount FOOD and ENERGY prices....which are the *bulk* of people's regular spending...?

Anyone know why this formula is used?
91 replies
Open
Mnrogar (100 D)
15 Mar 13 UTC
why are we not proceedig to the next phase?
Game-56

Everybody has input their orders (green check mark everywhere) why is the game not progressing???
6 replies
Open
Fasces349 (0 DX)
14 Mar 13 UTC
Liberal of the day awards
To help Sbyvl36 on his noble quest of muting liberals, we will utilize this thread in determining who is the most liberal person of the day, and why he is liberal. Post possible nominations below and reasons as to why they are the liberal of the day. Together we should be able to make a decision and make Sbyvl36s life easier.
21 replies
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
15 Mar 13 UTC
Better Thought Experiments than SYnapse Posted
Schrodinger's Cat. Borel's Monkeys. Parfit's Teleporter. No. Pensées... so much more fun. More thought; no answers.
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
15 Mar 13 UTC
Imagine a not too distant future in which there exists a café of the sort that you would expect to find in a trendy urban district where young professionals and aspiring artists gather to work, to socialize, and, of course, to be seen.

This café is different, though. There are no tables or couches; no bar stools or lounge chairs. There are, however, a series of numbered doors lining the interior walls. Above each door, a digital clock counts down from assorted and seemingly random times. Occasionally, a faint thumping can be heard, but it is indistinct and barely noticeable.

Customers enter the café and approach the service bar. They order a latte or an espresso or chai and they sign some papers. They pay while they wait for their drink, and, when it is ready, they take it along with a bracelet and a plastic card.

Drink in hand, they make their way to one of the numbered doors, swipe the card to unlock it, and they walk inside. Behind them the door closes and locks automatically. Outside, above the door, the digital clock above the door begins to count down from three hours. Inside, the patron sets his coffee down at a bare table and pulls out the lone chair. The acoustic foam lining the walls makes every sound palpable: the unzipping of the laptop bag; the placing, gently, of the ultra-slim computer on the table; the first few keystrokes.

A glance at the signal strength indicator confirms what has been agreed upon: no wireless signal. So too does a tug on the door handle: locked, from the outside. And it is as quiet as promised, except for the surprisingly audible thumping of the heart.

Clever proprietors had discovered that people are now willing to pay to be kept, for a period of time, in an enforced state of un-distractedness. Years earlier, certain applications had promised something similar. They offered Freedom from distraction by preventing a device from connecting to the Internet for a pre-determined period of time. But this extension of the will proved too easily circumvented. A more radical cure was needed.

Having signed the appropriate legal waivers, customers at Pensées were securely locked into their cells so that they may work, without interruption, on whatever task needed their undivided attention. The bracelets monitored their vital signs in the event of a medical emergency. Barring such an emergency, proprietors pledged to keep the door closed without exception. (Patrons were aware that cameras monitored the inside of each cell; only legal and legitimate work was to be done within, naturally.) It was not uncommon, then, for some patrons eventually to demand, by sometimes frantic gesticulations, that they be allowed to exit.

Such requests were always denied as a matter of course. It was for this denial of their misguided desire, after all, that they had paid their good money.

Those who came to Pensées, and to similar establishments, had discovered by then that their unaided will could not be trusted. They came to be productive: to finish their papers or work on their manuscripts and screenplays. Some came simply to sit and think. The more religious, came to pray or to meditate.

Such acts may have been possible outside the soundproof walls of Pensées’ cells, but this was merely a theoretical possibility to most. (Of course, those who ran Pensées never suggested that, even within the walls of their cells, the possibility remained thoroughly theoretical.)

Inside their cells, the experience of patrons proceeded along a surprisingly predictable path. With eager hopefulness they set up their workspace just so and launched, almost giddy, into their work. Within minutes, sometimes seconds, they would casually laugh off the urge they suddenly felt to check their smartphones for some incoming message or alert. They had no signal, they knew, but the urge persisted. They felt silly when they took out their smartphones to confirm what they already knew to be the case. Then, they put it away with a self-knowing smirk; or, rather, they set it down within view of their peripheral vision. No harm done since there was no signal, but, annoyingly, glances followed.

Between glances, eyes would flit toward that place on the screen were numbers in parenthesis would signal new items of various sorts that required attention. But there were none of these either, just as had been hoped for and paid for. But it was increasingly frustrating to catch oneself repeatedly looking anyway.

After a few minutes of this, work would resume, but in bursts punctuated by periods of wandering thoughts, random observations, and disjointed inner monologues. Perhaps decaf would be better next time. It’s hard to focus when a muscle twitches involuntarily. The inability to voluntarily direct one’s attention was bad enough; that the body would now prove equally unruly was dispiriting.

It was not unusual for some to then reach for their smartphones, almost unconsciously, and then to handle it as if it were their rosary beads.* Or they may stand up and pace about the cramped but comfortable cell, not yet anxiously, only to get the blood flowing before sitting down to work with renewed focus. And so they did, for a short while, before they began to wonder if it was not absurd to pay to be locked in a room. And how much time had gone by they wondered? The phone, at least, was still good for that – to register the fact that hardly any time at all had passed.

Some then grew anxious as they fixated on time, which advanced glacially. Silence, for which they had been willing, just minutes before, to pay, now seemed oppressive. No work was being accomplished, and most thoughts that were thought turned out to be depressingly banal; those that were not were disconcerting.

They turned to the camera and wondered just how serious the proprietors were about refusing to allow patrons to exit their cells. Quite serious, it always turned out, despite the desperate pounding of some. Anxiety attacks did not, according to the terms agreed to, constitute a medical emergency.

Some eventually fell asleep. Some went back to their desks to eek out some semblance of work so that they would have something, at least, to show for their ordeal. Others stared blankly at the door, straining to hear the gentle tone that would signal the end of their time in the cell.

When it came, some patrons exited hurriedly and others stumbled out, bewildered. A few tried to make a good show of it, walking off with whatever air of accomplishment they could feign. Most were seen eagerly staring at their smartphone waiting for it to come online. Surprisingly, every so often, there were some who walked away looking as if they’d learned something rather important. About what, exactly, it was never clear.
Octavious (2701 D)
15 Mar 13 UTC
They learned to go to a better cafe? Or read a contract before signing the damned thing?
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
15 Mar 13 UTC
The only thing I'd do in that cell is troll the webDip forums.
dubmdell (556 D)
15 Mar 13 UTC
Bo_sox, shut the fuck up. http://imgur.com/U9mt72m.png
Draugnar (0 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
And bo_sox proves that he likes to plagiarize...

http://thefrailestthing.com/2013/01/10/pensees-a-imaginative-thought-experiment/
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
15 Mar 13 UTC
Uhh... you think I was saying it was mine? It has a name, you know.
Draugnar (0 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
You didn't give credit to the author, Michael Sacasas, nor to the original source. That is plagiarism. Go ahead and try to give this to one of your teachers just as you presented it here and you will either get an A+ (because it is well written and your teacher is a putz who can't google the first line) or an F and possibly a more severe blackmark on your permanent record.
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
15 Mar 13 UTC
Okay Draug, thanks. I'll go tell my philosophy teacher who emailed it to me a few hours ago to cite his sources.

It takes balls to call my teachers something like "putz" without even knowing what school I go to. You really are some life reader or something. What do my palms say?
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
15 Mar 13 UTC
So yeah Draug, plagiarism is by definition "'wrongful appropriation' and 'purloining and publication' of another author's 'language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions,' and the representation of them as one's own original work."

Key being the "representation of them as one's own original work." Find where I said "I wrote this."

And, by the way, I got that from a dictionary. It's not my own original definition.
Draugnar (0 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
@bo

First, I said *f* your teacher gave you an A for it, he or she was a putz. I didn't say they were putzes in all circumstances. Only in one very specific set. Please try reading for comprehension.

Second, when posted to a public forum (this is readable by anyone even a guest to the site, and will show up after the search engines do their next spider of WebDip), it is implied when you don't credit the original author that you are presenting it as your own. Giving it in an email, as your teacher did, does not necessarily imply it is original, but posting to a public forum does.
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
15 Mar 13 UTC
Lol... not in a court of law it doesn't. Quit while you're .. well, not ahead, but not yet behind.
Draugnar (0 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
I hope you realize how stupid a statement that was. The law actually says the author could sue you. Anything beyond brief quotes that are published (a public forum is a publication method, just like a blog, and the court has recognized that) or longer quotations/use in Toto with citations is pursuable by the original author. In fact, just using characters for fan fiction has been pursued as copyright violation even when the fan fiction was published on a usenet group. That is why certain series don't have much if any fanfic: the owners of the copyright aggressively pursue and litigate to keep their IP "pure" while others welcome fanfic.

We have had this discussion on here long before you were here. It is plagiarism. will anything come of it? Not likely as this is so remote and unknown corner of the net, relatively speaking. But it doesn't make it any less plagiarism.

About legal Plagiarism:
http://definitions.uslegal.com/p/plagiarism/
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
15 Mar 13 UTC
Of course I realize how stupid a statement it was. I realize how stupid a conversation this is for two reasons: firstly, I didn't claim a work as mine, implicitly or otherwise, and secondly, I'm just waiting for you to shut up about it. You know, try locking yourself in a cell without webDip for a few hours until someone lets you out.
Draugnar (0 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
I was off webdip from 7:00pm Eastern until half an hour ago. That was about 3.5 hours. I was also off from just before noon until almost 5:00pm earlier. I had work to do. Last night I was off almost all night from getting off work at 5:30 until this morning.
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
15 Mar 13 UTC
Sounds like fun. While you worked, I daydreamed of a mountainside covered by eucalyptus and pine, snow falling gracefully unto the mass of branches, visibility limited to an arm's length as I trudge across glaciers and snow covered rifts thousands of feet in depth but invisible to me.

Sounds like I really need plans for summer break.
Draugnar (0 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
As my final word on plagiarism in the public forum, I present to you this article (please note #2 - copyright infringement):

http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2010/08/25/5-easy-ways-to-get-sued-on-facebook/

5 Easy Ways to Get Sued on Facebook

Posted on August 25, 2010 by Jonathan Bailey • 14 Comments




Social networking has been a boon for most Web users, allowing even the most non-tech savvy people a chance to connect with friends, publish photos and generally have a presence online. With some 500 million active users on Facebook, it is by far the largest social network and it has given a voice to millions who never would have even considered publishing online otherwise.

But while this has been a boon in many ways, most people are not familiar with mass media law and those who are often don’t see social networking as “publishing” worthy of such contemplation. However, Facebook is very much a public place and getting more so every day.

What you post on a Facebook, as well as other social networks, can easily come back to haunt you if you aren’t careful and it isn’t just jobs and relationships being destroyed, it’s also a matter of lawsuits being filed.

So what are some of the legal dangers that come with posting on Facebook. There are many but here are five of the more common ones.

1. Libel

If you post things on Facebook that are materially untrue about others and unfairly tarnishes their reputation, you can be sued for libel and it has happened before.

Though it might be tempting to think of Facebook as a private communication, a plaintiff only has to show that a third party saw the communication and it hurt their reputation. You can commit libel with something distributed to a small list of your friends the same as if you had posted it on the broader Web.

2. Copyright Infringement

If you post content that is copyrighted by others without their permission, they can, at least in theory, sue you for it. Once again, it is an infringement even if it was only distributed to a few of your friends, though that makes it much less likely that a copyright holder will sue.

I wasn’t able to find an example of a copyright holder suing for copyright infringement over a Facebook posting but it could easily happen. The suits and threats are rare now as much of the infringement likely is private but as Facebook opens up, so will the searches for copyrighted material and, along with it, the takedown filings and lawsuits.

This may be an impending wave more than a current one, but the risk is very real.

3. Privacy

Facebook itself has a very poor privacy reputation (and has been sued over it) but users can also contribute the problem by posting private information of others, including photos that were taken at a moment where the subject had a reasonable expectation of privacy or posting private information publicly.

With Facebook enabling tagging of posts and photos, it is easy to see how a user could upload something private about another person and let them know about it, only to discover that person is not too happy about the public exposure and decides to sue.

In short, be careful what you reveal and post about others without their permission.

4. Harassment

Harassment is defined as when someone “repeatedly behaved in a manner that was perceived as intrusive or threatening.” On that front, there is hardly a better place to harass someone than on Facebook (or any other social network).

At least some cases of Facebook harassment have reached the courts, including one case where a son sued his own mother for harassment after she broke into his account and posted as him.

The big problem with harassment is that what one person defines has harassment another might not. As such, if someone asks you to leave them alone, it is probably wise to do so.

5. Breach of Contract

Finally, this is a very broad area to consider but most people who use Facebook have other jobs and many of those jobs have rules and regulations about what one can and can not discuss in public. These are often enforced in non-disclosure agreements that are buried within the documents a new employee or contractor signs when joining up.

If you talk too intimately about your work, or anything else you’ve agreed not to talk about, you could find yourself facing a lawsuit for breach of contract. However, that can be said on pretty much anything you signed a contract to do and didn’t do, including wearing the wrong hair extensions.

Bottom Line

In the end, Facebook is not much different legally than blogging and that’s because, in many ways, the two acts are very similar. The only difference being that Facebook favors shorter posts to a (theoretically) smaller audience. However, both still involve publishing content to a broader audience across the Web and, as such, both come with very similar potential legal pitfalls.

So it is important to treat your Facebook posting the same as you would your blogging or anything you posted to a public forum. The law isn’t going to draw much of a distinction between the two in most areas and, as such, there isn’t much reason you should either.
krellin (80 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
Draug is absolutely correct -- you didn't cite a source...you posted it under your own name. MOST people when *publishing* something like this...and you HAVE published it under your pen (webdip) name...either give a LINK after a few quoted lines, or tell where it came from.

Whether by accident, or because you are immoral, or maybe even ignorance, you put this up as if it was your own work.

Draug corrected you (perhaps in harsh terms, I admit). You then had two choices:
1. THANK DRAUG for pointing out your (maybe honet) mistake, and correcting it, or,
2. Get defensive....proving what we all already knew, which is that you are an asshole and were trying to pass off someone else's work as your own.

And...for the record...it was too long to read and not interesting...the bashing of you because of it is *far* more entertaining than the OP.
Draugnar (0 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
Actually, I rather enjoyed it to a point. But then I started to glaze over. Perhaps in another medium where I could read a few paragraphs then take a break or I could read it over a cup of coffee casually...
Draugnar (0 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
And there is no such thing as "too harsh" when it comes to plagiarism by a school boy. Gotta teach 'em as soon as they do it that it is totally unacceptable, especially word-for-word plagiarism like this.
krellin (80 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
WHY it is not even remotely interesting is because it is written as if it actually happened, when it did not. It is not based upon fact, and really not even based upon conjecture, but is just poorly written fiction, as opposed to an actual experiment someone *could* perform if they were so inclined. Thus, the concluding sentence about "wondering what they might have learned" is meaningless...

As a comparison, there *have* been restaurants, for example, that operate in 100% pure darkness, which causes a massive heightening of the senses of touch, smell and taste. A very interesting concept, indeed, ACTUALLY PLAYED OUT in real life.

This, by comparison, is drivel.

How am I not surprised that you would find such pointless drivel entertaining...
krellin (80 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
Draug...I enjoyed the first couple of paragraphs, but upon realizing that it is a made-up expirement with made up results, it became pointless and meaningless and a complete waste of my time. I only scanned through the entire thing to mock it.
A better author could have turned it in to an intersting short story, and instead of asking at the end what someone might have learned, would have demonstrated exactly what was learned by one or more patrons...i.e. the story WOULD HAVE HAD A POINT.

This was pointless drivel.
krellin (80 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
It reminds me of getting high on college and imagine the ultimate way to torture someone....brain surgery to disconnect any outside senses - touch, feel, sound, vision, taste, etc....and then dose them up on large quantities of acid or other hallucinogenics.

An interesting thought expirement...but as I describe it here, not very interesting, because I offer no suggestion as to what it would be like, what the victim might actually experience or learn.


Same as this "thought expirement"....no lesson learned is even suggested, and I truly have no idea what the author was driving at.

And I like to bash bo...because he's an idiot.
Draugnar (0 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
@krell's baby...

"Imagine a not too distant future ..."

What part of that "not-to-distant future" makes it sound like it already happened? It's the first line dude.
SYnapse (0 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
bo_sox what was the intrinsic philosophical point in the story? I thought it was garbage
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
15 Mar 13 UTC
The fact that you have to think to find an answer that nobody else will have rather than just deciding between killing five and one. If that's garbage to you, then please, spend your life on the trolley problem.

Love you, krelly.
krellin (80 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
As I said...got bored, didn't read comletely, because it has no point...

I missed the manufactured problem you reference in the "what if" situation. If *this* is what really keeps you up at night thinking, then you have issues. I spend *MY* life thinking about *real* problems.

Again...waste of time, poorly written/poorly conceived drivel.
krellin (80 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
In short, anything that goes kind of like this: "Image you are in X, and <constructs a completely implausible/impossible situation>....WHAT WOULD YOU DO?>

And then professes itself to be a great thought experiment and suggests it will give you some sort of onsite into life....

...is nonsense and a waste of time. Pure mental masturbation...something bo is an expert at.
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
15 Mar 13 UTC
There's hardly anything that keeps me up at night. I sleep like a baby o_O

If you spend your life thinking about real problems, then this should be no more appealing than any other thought experiment, because they are what they called: thought.
SYnapse (0 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
There is no answer though it's just a bunch of metaphysical bullshit

Whereas the trolley problem has many real answers that define humanity
krellin (80 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
Big surprise...bo give a nonsensical reply...tells us he doesn't think about real problems...doesn't spend his time think about anything...shocking revelation...

I'm frightened that I agree with SYnapse. Oh well, disagreeing with bo makes for all sorts of allies, so demented is his mental vomit...
Yellowjacket (835 D(B))
15 Mar 13 UTC
(+2)
This is hilarious.

Draugnar, it's only plagiarism by the barest technicality. Nobody but you gives a shit if somebody doesn't cite where they pulled an article. Nobody here but you thinks bo was trying to claim ownership of the work. He was probably operating under the reasonable assumption that nobody would give a rat's ass, but then he hasn't seen Draug before Draug has had his coffee.

Get over it man.
krellin (80 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
I agree with Draug -- most people, just as a matter of habit, would *in some form* give credit, provide a link...something...if for no other reason so that you can explore other writing's by the SOURCE if you enjoy what is posted. Clearly this was an attempt to claim credit - it is *hardly* a stretch to think that bo-the-illiterate would be trying to puff up his intellectual credibility by posting something he thinks is witty and claiming it as his own. bo's a little shit - already known by all - and this just further demonstrates his lack of ethics.
krellin (80 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
And I will again point out his *defensive* stance when called out, instead of admitting a mistake and thanking Draug for a lesson learned. Complete lack of humility.
Draugnar (0 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
"Nobody but you gives a shit if somebody doesn't cite where they pulled an article"

Don't tell SillyPutty that. I used just a pragraph or two for a lengthy article once and he got all up in my shit about plagiarizing. Imagine how he would respond to using the entire story if he still hung out here.
Draugnar (0 DX)
15 Mar 13 UTC
How I wished I had handled it... I wish I would have said "Great bit of writing there, bo. Was that for a school paper?" and seen what his response was. Then if he had said "Yeah, I got an A for it" I would have been *all* up in his shit, and if he had said "No, my teacher emailed it to a bunch of us" I would have just sent him to the original dource and said "If you want to read more about and from this author, check out his blog."
Yellowjacket (835 D(B))
15 Mar 13 UTC
@draug lol well we both know Putin is a moron. I just didn't think this was the type of technicality you would focus on, but I can see why you would if you really thought he was trying to say it was his own. Yes, you should have run this experiment. I definitely wasn't under the impression he was posting it as his own work, and I think he would have made that clear.

@krellin Draug's approach would have put most anybody on the defensive (plagiarism accusation, followed by assumption it was used in a submission). I don't think it is clear at all that he was doing as you say. It is possible, yes, but I don't think it's absolute, or even likely.
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
15 Mar 13 UTC
When someone attacks you, you don't completely bypass their point, you defend. The only reason krellin agrees with Draug - as he previously said himself - was to disagree with me. I wonder if others completely ignore krellin's "thoughts" to the same degree that I do.


37 replies
hecks (164 D)
15 Mar 13 UTC
Blankflag variant
global press only no punctuation capitalization or line breaks anyone who uses them has to nmr the round whos in
4 replies
Open
Sbyvl36 (439 D)
14 Mar 13 UTC
A mute a day keeps the Liberals away.
I have now started a tradition of muting one liberal everyday. I mute these people based on the radical statements that they make in the forum. As I don't want to hear it anymore, I am taking advantage of a very pleasant tool.
71 replies
Open
CSteinhardt (9560 D(B))
15 Mar 13 UTC
EOG: Grande Armée
5 replies
Open
zultar (4180 DMod(P))
14 Mar 13 UTC
(+3)
Happy Pi Day! (and happy bday to me too :)
Three point one four one
Five nine two six five three five
Eight nine. And so on.
50 replies
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
15 Mar 13 UTC
An MSNBC Article a Day Keeps Sbyvl Away Because He Likely Muted Me
http://theclicker.today.com/_news/2013/03/14/17313112-big-bang-theory-stars-tease-bittersweet-episode-romance?lite

The Big Bang Theory. Let's go, liberals.
5 replies
Open
jimgov (219 D(B))
15 Mar 13 UTC
Real Science! The Higgs Boson confirmed
Since we are talking science today, I've noticed that no one has jumped on the announcement that the Higgs Boson was confirmed today. Although it has been suspected for decades, actually finding the particle that possibly gives everything its mass is a huge announcement.
15 replies
Open
Mathmaticious (100 D)
15 Mar 13 UTC
Join my game gameID=112459
0 replies
Open
King Atom (100 D)
14 Mar 13 UTC
(+2)
I'm Taking Back This Goddamn Forum!
I USED to be the Liberal antagonist troll 'round these parts. Now Sbyvl69 thinks he can just come through and stick his ass in the burner? Hell no, Subivyl, I defy you and your poorly placed beliefs. AND I WON'T REST UNTIL YOU'RE DEAD! (Also, anyone who 'keeps' krellin, but mutes Draug is just about the dumbest dumbass in the world.)
8 replies
Open
TheMinisterOfWar (553 D)
10 Mar 13 UTC
Last seen online?
I just saw somebody in a game online with a blue icon, but it didn't change the flag 'last seen online'. Question: how do these functions work? Is the blue icon reliable? Does the flag switch when a game is opened or literally when somebody is online?
14 replies
Open
ghug (5068 D(B))
14 Mar 13 UTC
(+2)
Hey Thucy
"On the other hand if I must say anything on the subject of female excellence to those of you who will now be in widowhood, it will be all comprised in this brief exhortation. Great will be your glory in not falling short of your natural character; and greatest will be hers who is least talked of among the men whether for good or for bad." -Thucydides

#hypocrite #sexist #fuckthucy #ineedtogetsomesleep
1 reply
Open
2ndWhiteLine (2611 D(B))
14 Mar 13 UTC
Shooting in my hometown today
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/nyregion/four-killed-in-shootings-in-upstate-new-york.html?hp&_r=0
113 replies
Open
Admiral Jones (0 DX)
14 Mar 13 UTC
Unpause
Hello all, I am in a game with six others playing in 1902 Europe and we all paused the game and now cannot unpause it and continue playing. How do we unpause and continue??
4 replies
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
14 Mar 13 UTC
(+1)
Blankflag Confusion Thread
If Nigee wasn't enough... here you go.
11 replies
Open
Fasces349 (0 DX)
13 Mar 13 UTC
Burning fossil fuels makes the planet greener?
see below.
88 replies
Open
yaks (218 D)
13 Mar 13 UTC
Underused Move
Look for the post
21 replies
Open
blankflag (0 DX)
14 Mar 13 UTC
expert advice needed
it seems as though i played everything perfectly, yet somehow lost. im not sure what happened here. is it possible i am not as skilled as i once thought?
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=112222#gamePanel
6 replies
Open
Microfarad (100 D)
14 Mar 13 UTC
Cannot vote unpause
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=111482
In this game we are not able to unpause. Please an administrator fix it
1 reply
Open
Mathmaticious (100 D)
14 Mar 13 UTC
Join my game. gameID=112459
0 replies
Open
steephie22 (182 D(S))
13 Mar 13 UTC
Do Americans save money?
It may just be stupid television, but it seems like most Americans either spend their money as soon as they get it or save it to buy something more expensive as soon as they've got enough. Is this true for most Americans or is that just television? I don't know about other countries but here in the Netherlands most people (adults at least) have quite some money stashed on a bank account for worse days...
44 replies
Open
Babyboy (111 D)
23 Feb 13 UTC
Noobi tourny
5 point gunboat, classic map tourny for noobs.
please post below if intrested.
48 replies
Open
TheMinisterOfWar (553 D)
24 Feb 13 UTC
Default disband orders?
Hey all, I just joined a game as CD replacement, and Russia CDd as well during a disband phase. Since he does not fill in a disband order, the adjudicator forces him to disband.
My question: how is this disband determined?

28 replies
Open
jgurstein (0 DX)
14 Mar 13 UTC
locked games
I don't understand it: I see so many locked games that people join but I never see them advertised in the forum. How do people who create the game expect to get the password to potential players? And, if I want to participate in a locked game, would it be odd to pm one of the players who already joined and just ask for the password?
3 replies
Open
DoctorJingles (212 D)
14 Mar 13 UTC
Live gunboat interest thread.
Trying to play a live gunboat wta on either Ancient med or the classic map. anyone interested in playing either, post below and just put which map you prefer. which ever gets enough players first, i will start a game. lets go guys :)
2 replies
Open
Page 1031 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top