And I am an active player. Har har har.

I am not an active player.

I propose that only players whose usernames start with a number are allowed to win.

I vote against 2ndWhiteLine's motion while there are still only three people capable of voting.

this is confusing

I vote against.....

F Moscow SC - Iceland

And I propose that a "win" be more clearly defined - say, x number of rules must be ratified, or perhaps something more challenging.

I vote ......I

I vote that we allow multis.

If said vote is passed prior, I will second 2WL's notion.

I vote yes for bo_sox!

I propose that all players must imagine an ongoing diplomacy board, and the controller of the country which manages to solo wins the game.

also, i vote against Bo_SOx's proposal (and get my banhammer ready), and against 2nd white line's.

List of votes:
1) I propose that only players whose usernames start with a number are allowed to win. [-2]
2) I vote that we allow multis. [0]
3) all players must imagine an ongoing diplomacy board, and the controller of the country which manages to solo wins the game. [1]

(votes counted for +1, against -1, abstain 0, for the purpose of determining which rules are currently in effect please copy and paste this list, a rule needs to have more than 50% of active players in favour, thus a positive number is required, 0 will not do)

I vote for orathaic's proposal, and against proposals 1 and 2 in the post above.

A net system for counting votes isn't a good idea. We don't need all votes to come in - only four people must be in favour.

There are 7 active players.
1) I propose that only players whose usernames start with a number are allowed to win. [1 vote]
2) I vote that we allow multis. [2 votes]
3) all players must imagine an ongoing diplomacy board, and the controller of the country which manages to solo wins the game. [2 votes]

I propose that the following rule be added: "If an unpassed motion has not been voted upon in 12 hours, that motion is considered dead. Dead motions should not be listed with other active motions on any motions list."

I move that you must have a number in your username to win, regardless of whether it begins with that number.

I also propose that a system of currency be created. The unit of currency is the "white line". All players begin with one white line, except for 2WL who begins with 2. If a player accrues one million white lines, he wins all the marbles. There are exactly 77 marbles to be won - no more, no less.

Broadley, hold long before a proposal is no longer active? and will a player which is not active have their vote automatically removed?

i vote for the proposed currency - as eludicated by TBroadley today at 06:50 PM

I was proposing that after 12 hours a proposal becomes dead. I think that inactive players should have their votes removed so:

I propose that the following rule be added: "An inactive player is one who has not posted in at least one day. Votes from inactive players are not counted in vote tallies for motions."

I vote against bo_sox48's motion that we allow multis.

I vote against zelmoby's motion that a "win" be more clearly defined - say, x number of rules must be ratified, or perhaps something more challenging.

I vote against orathaic's motion that all players must imagine an ongoing diplomacy board, and the controller of the country which manages to solo wins the game.

I vot for TBroadley's motion that the following rule be added: "If an unpassed motion has not been voted upon in 12 hours, that motion is considered dead. Dead motions should not be listed with other active motions on any motions list."

I vote against jcbryan97's motion that you must have a number in your username to win, regardless of whether it begins with that number.

I vote against TBroadley's motion that a system of currency be created, etc.

I vote for TBroadley's motion that the following rule be added: "An inactive player is one who has not posted in at least one day. Votes from inactive players are not counted in vote tallies for motions."

I move that henceforth, all motions be numbered sequentially for ease of common reference.

i don't think you need a rule to number the proposals

you just need to start a convention, and people need to follow it.

the copy&paste which works for other forum things should work fine.