Is 'mu' supposed to mean something?

hahahahahaha awesome

Maybe if you transplanted her brain into Jessica Alba?

Yes.

No man. Rania looks just fine the way she is. Also, I don't know if her brain would fit into Alba's head.

noone is perfect

I beg to differ, my dear hellalt.

no

I will go on record to say she's a close second to my wife, but not too close, because my wife can get pretty violent; so I have to be sure to support-hold her.

Ok, my wife left the room. So - Yes!! :P

I think "mu" is a japanses word which means wrong question or meaningless question. Robert Pirsig talks about the concept of "mu" in his book Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.

Is it similar than to "moot"?

But couldn't any question be deemed meaningless since it is a matter of perception or relativeness? Who is it that determines a question's level of meaninglessness?

Not really. A moot point is one that is open to debate. Whereas "mu" might be used in answer to question which is poorly conceived.
For example "What is the meaning of life?" might be a question to which one would repy "mu". That is the question itself might possibly be flawed.
Wikipedia offers this quote from Pirsig (although in the book he provides many other examples:
* In his 1974 novel Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, Robert M. Pirsig translated mu as "no thing", saying that it meant "unask the question". He offered the example of a computer circuit using the binary numeral system, in effect using mu to represent high impedance:

For example, it's stated over and over again that computer circuits exhibit only two states, a voltage for "one" and a voltage for "zero". That's silly! Any computer-electronics technician knows otherwise. Try to find a voltage representing one or zero when the power is off! The circuits are in a mu-state.

@LanGaidin "But couldn't any question be deemed meaningless since it is a matter of perception or relativeness? Who is it that determines a question's level of meaninglessness?"

The philopsophical school of Deconstrution (Derrida and co) might possibly agree with you. Personally I do not agree. I think there questions which obviously have meaning.
For example: Q. What is the capital of the United Kingdom? A. London. A recently appointed US ambassador to the UK would find meaning in this question. Such a question would help him find the US embassy in Britain, rather than looking for it in Moscow.
The question/answer, however might be meaningless if the asker and the answerer have different definitions of UK and Capital and London.

To the OP: no

queen rania is a fox. but i'd pick lady diana for my [imaginary] throne...

No, but just because she isn't Catholic.

I wish I could interview her.

No. Actually, from the photos on Google, she's not even close. YMMV.