"defender of polish anti semites? when did i do that?"
You regurgitate talking points from the same people who went around listing the "Jewish names" of the "Stalinist agents" who supposedly murdered 10 or is it 22,000 Polish officers (these names were invented out of wholecloth, that didn't stop Sikorski from disseminating them). The Polish government-in-exile's leadership, Sikorski, preferred collaborating with Nazi propagandists than fighting the Germans. 100,000 Poles fought for the Wehrmacht, and Poles refused to fight to liberate their own homeland because they wanted Ukrainian and Belarussian territory east of the Curzon line (a position you're sympathetic towards with your crap about the Soviet 'invasion' of 1939). These are the people who you cite approvingly, while slandering the army who annihilated the Nazi regime without even questioning the credibility of the accusers or accusations.
". My would, however, isnt black and white like yours."
Yeah, right, when I think of nuance, I think of you. So fine, you give nuanced support to Goebbels propaganda against the army that liberated the concentration camps. Congratulations.
"Permissive of state sponsored Massacres (as long as they are done by nations "independent" of the United States)"
By "permissive" I assume you mean -> don't want to carpet bomb and invade every country experiencing civil war? Got me on that one. Although you continue to insist that you share the same position. Guess that's not true, is it? But you sure do complain a lot whenever I say that you're in favor of using the US military to punish supposed 'enemies' who are trying to put down insurrections. Because the most important thing for a weak government facing armed rebellion is not establishing authority so the country doesn't disintegrate into anarchy, but that they abide by Santa's high standards of liberal rights when dealing with rebels who massacre black people for sport.
"all of which add up to a Stalinist."
You don't have a clue what "Stalinist" means, frankly because it's a meaningless term. Stalinist = Leninist. It's a term invented by Trotskyites who wanted to attack Marxism-Leninism so they called it something else.
"Anti U.S. Imperialist but an apologist for Russian Imperialism"
That's cute. What 'Russian imperialism' are you referring to? Ah that's right, the so-called "invasion" of Ukrainian and Belarussian territory in 1939. I'm sure you'd call a Chinese invasion of Taiwan "imperialism" too. Did you know Ukrainians and Belarussians to this day celebrate this event as a holiday? Damn those Russian (or wait, Belarussian?) imperialists!
"Supportive of a command Economy"
So do non-"Stalinists" Marxists not support a command economy? Wouldn't they then be, capitalists, genius?
"Anti Civil Liberties for those he disagrees with"
You could say that about everyone. I guess everyone's a "Stalinist".