Actually, as is obvious to almost every here but you, krellin, I'm pondering the hilarity of a small social experiment on a man whos response to a serious argument is exactly the same as his response to a patently absurd one.
For all intents and purposes, *you cannot tell the difference* Your reaction to each is the same. I mean I even told you what I was going to do and you still treated it seriously - well if by "serious" you mean your customary hurling abuse and critiquing the IQs of your detractors. You don't really care what you're typing, as long as you feel like you're scoring a point when you type it.
I mean, read back on this whole thing, and observe how I draw out entire paragraphs of response from you by just changing the topic to a new level of absurdity. I didn't even do more than skim anything you replied with. I never responded directly to any challenge or statement you made either, I just attacked attacked attacked in a completely uncoordinated and nonsensical way and surprisingly you kept going along with it in what you no doubt see as a desperate game of one-upmanship.
Knowing what I know, why in gods name do you think anyone should ever take anything you say seriously? You don't argue to prove a point, you argue because it's an opportunity for you to mark out other people. Anything rational you may begin saying is merely a segue into that end goal. And that is why whenever you enter a conversation lately, I just skip to the part you like best.
Thanks for playing along (as if you could stop yourself), you giant, wet, douche.