##VOTE circle

##VOTE When Harry Met Sally

##VOTE Rubber

##vote Circle
##vote Rubber

##VOTE The Godfather
##VOTE Good Will Hunting
##VOTE Monty Pyton and the Holy Grail vs No. 17 Big Trouble in Little China
##VOTE Rubber
##VOTE Alien
##VOTE Raider's of the Lost Ark
##VOTE The Martrix vs. No. 9 Circle

##vote when Harry met Sally
##vote rubber
##vote circle

You already voted for Rubber.

##vote rubber
##vote rubber
##vote rubber
##vote rubber

You're really rubbering that vote in...

Goddammit, if anyone but Vash was the TD, the good films would actually advance

##Vote Godfather
##Vote Good Will Hunting
##Vote Mony Python
##Vote Casablanca
##Vote V for Vendetta
##Vote Alien
##Vote Raiders
##Vote Matrix

##Vote The Godfather
##Vote Good Will Hunting
##Vote Monty Python
##Vote Casablanca
##Vote V for Vendetta
##Vote Alien
##Vote Raiders
##Vote Circle

But V for Vendetta isn't a good film lol

##VOTE Alien
## VOTE Rubber
##VOTE Circle

V for Vendetta was entertaining, but I can perhaps admit it wasn't "good" in a film critic sense.

The same cannot be said of the Matrix, however. Give me an actual argument on that one.

I can stomach Virus for Vendetta losing here. But the Matrix losing would be an actual travesty

*V. Dumb autocorrect

I'm just here for the meme

tough one between circle and matrix but I think circle is just slightly better.
##Vote circle

##VOTE The Godfather
##VOTE Good Will Hunting
##VOTE Monty Python
##VOTE When Harry met Sally
##VOTE Rubber
##VOTE Alien
##VOTE Raiders of the Lost Ark
##VOTE The Matrix

Flum, what groundbreaking innovation did Circle bring that fundamentally changed movies afterward?

And moreover, the Matrix asks philosophical questions in a much less ham-fisted manner, has characters you actually enjoy, and the script isn't clunky garbage.

And oh, an actual story too. The whole positive behind Circle is that it asks fundamental questions on human nature and the prejudices in society. If the Matrix can be better at being philosophical while also having an actual plot, why is it worse?

The thing about the Matrix is that it tries to be a great movie, but the second half brings it down. The Matrix stinks because the first half is so good, and the second half just turns into a weird action movie where everyone wears leather and they forgot about all the interesting parts of the first half. Its so disappointing.

It's not without flaws. But that makes it worse than a low-budget, poorly executed and poorly received movie? Because it started off stronger than it finished?

##Vote Tom Dick Harry

##vote Monty Python
##vote Matrix

##vote The Godfather
##vote Monty Python
##vote When Harry Met Sally
##vote Rubber!!!
##vote Das Boot
##vote Raiders of the Lost Ark
##vote Circle

Also let's just point out how horribly overhyped The Matrix is, which instantly degrades it, and end with two words:

Reloaded.
Revolutions.

We're not voting on the sequels

Allright. More movie griping. V for Vendetta is not a good movie. In fact it shares some of the complaints I presented with the Matrix. Where the Matrix is a good movie for the first half with an original premise, and some thought provoking ideas (which gets completely undone by nonsensical action scenes, abysmal acting, and a bad conclusion), V for Vendetta is undone by being consistently bad throughout. It has better acting, but again relies on dumb action gimmicks to make it appear interesting.

In reality V for Vendetta is like 1984 made for pre-schoolers. It thinks the audience is so dumb that they can't possibly comprehend a complex movie. The topic should be deep but the movie instead beats you over the head for eternity with the most simplistic, black and white viewpoint. It is nauseating. It's just anarchy porn for morons. The best thing I can say about it is that it has some really good lighting effects...

Also, poor Hugo Weaving. He's not even that bad an actor - but these movies suck.