@Conservative Man:
No.
Putin is not "the new you."
If he were, I wouldn't waste my time even criticizing him.
@krellin and spyman:
It's not the conviction or opinionated nature of Putin's views that bother me, it's that:
1. There's conviction, and then there's just being stubbornly ignorant--if Putin said 2+2=5, and I corrected him and said it was 4, he'd defend that it was 5 no matter WHAT...part of conviction is the willingness to test adn possibly adapt or accept new ideas, to be open, as I try to be (I may not always be successful, but hey, I do try, and I HAVE changed my position in the face of logic before--Putin, I can't remember him ever doing so, and that bothers me, you MUST at least acknowledge you might possibly be partially incorrect if the evidence warrants it, and Putin doesn't make that acknowledgement, so, again, unless he's 100% right all the time always forevermore...)
2. I think Invictus nailed it on the head when he said Putin is a contrarian; at least sometimes it really does come across to me as if he's picking the other side just to pick the other side, which I don't see many here doing, at least not all that often.
3. His lack of logical backing really gets irritating sometimes for his assertions; again, it's not his ideas so much I dislike--well, I do, but those are fair game and his opinion and a different matter altogether, each to their own--as the fact that he frequently makes huge leaps in logic and uneasy assertions and doesn't take adequate time for such big-time, often wild claims or ideas, doesn't nail them down and try and make them stick (hence why so many of my posts, especially those in response to a challenge or point, can be so long, I try and adress in bullets or numbers every counterpoint I make and try and make it stick logically.)
I'm not saying I'm a better poster than he, or that I'm error-free--I'm NOT, as anyone who's had even one debate with me here will be quick to point out--but these three things really get grating, when he acts like he knows it all, will never change his mind about anything, even if logic demands at least consideration of the other view, and when he doesn't qualify his terms or give a proper 1-2-3 logical progression to his bigger ideas, which really do require them.