Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 1222 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
VashtaNeurotic (2394 D)
27 Dec 14 UTC
Let's Talk about GMOs
So, yeah. If you are unfamiliar with the term, GMOs are genetically modified organisms, which usually refers to crops that have been modified for various reasons. Anyway, there are many groups of people who want to ban the use (or at least have labeling) of GMOs. How do you feel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_food_controversies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_organism
65 replies
Open
ssorenn (0 DX)
28 Dec 14 UTC
Looking to start a high quality game in beginning of year. Who's in?
WTA,FP,24-36 hours 25-60 D.
5 replies
Open
stranskizzle (324 D)
29 Dec 14 UTC
live game anon wta
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=152731
0 replies
Open
Marz (515 D)
29 Dec 14 UTC
Let's get a game
Anybody up for a high level classic game with a 36 hour phase length, and a 200 point buy in?
PM if you want to join, but only if you're prepared to send a lot of press (Read: Lies)
2 replies
Open
JamesYanik (548 D)
28 Dec 14 UTC
6 hour phase game
gameID=152703
starts in 50 minutes and we only need 2 more, it will be fast but that is all part of the fun
0 replies
Open
steephie22 (182 D(S))
26 Dec 14 UTC
Who can tell me how to write "Fight and Forgive" in Latin?
It'd be in the sense of a rule or motto.
53 replies
Open
trip (696 D(B))
19 Dec 14 UTC
Lusthog Variant
A Gunboat with the additional rule of not voting to draw until someone wins, or the game stalemated. Once a stalemate line is formed and held, the game ends. Sign up inside...
30 replies
Open
Al Swearengen (0 DX)
23 Dec 14 UTC
Philosophical Question - Security
Under what circumstances is it permissible to decline to offer protection to a woman?
21 replies
Open
Strauss (758 D)
23 Dec 14 UTC
Turn the other Cheek?
It's a question of the interpretation.
11 replies
Open
ILN (100 D)
26 Dec 14 UTC
Possible 2 Years in Jail for Japanese "Artists" 3D Printed Vagina Modelled Kayak
http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/japanese-artist-held-attempting-3 D-print-love-boat/

Not even the onion can come up with stuff like this lmao
5 replies
Open
Lord Joseph (100 D)
26 Dec 14 UTC
REFILL IN SUPPLY CENTERS
How can I refill troops or fleets in my supply centers every autumm? Please answer. It´s the first time I´m playing "1914" on line.
4 replies
Open
Thucydides (864 D(B))
24 Dec 14 UTC
(+4)
Petition to honor the 1914 Great War Christmas Truce
...with a universal pause and message of peace and goodwill to all visitors to our site.
50 replies
Open
President Eden (2750 D)
22 Dec 14 UTC
North Korea: US govt 'deeply involved' in Sony film; strikes threatened
http://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-north-korea-sony-20141221-story.html

To think anybody caved to these loony tunes. smh
8 replies
Open
Strauss (758 D)
07 Dec 14 UTC
(+1)
Time...
... is the most omnipresent and mysterious phenomenon of this world.
Strauss (758 D)
07 Dec 14 UTC
(+2)
Is causality a product of the time, or is time a product of the causality? Is time a product of the existence of space and movement, or does exist movement only on account of the availability of the time? Is there a present? If so, how long it lasts? Is it not already a past if we perceive them? Is there only just one, universally valid time, or are there several, and do these pass always equally fast? Does this phenomenon exist generally which we call "time", or does it happen only in our heads? Are telescopes "time machines"? The more further or deeper we look in the universe, the more older the observed objects. Does the astronomy not have, therefore, always a palaeontology aspect?

In our perception the being of the time is a continuous flow along of the events. Changes are indicators for trickling away the time. The time has several facets, depending on upon which part of the reality we direct the look.

The "Absolute Time" is an attribute of the world as a whole. She doesn't exist, she are none metaphysical idea, she are an attribute of the constant change of the world. Every moment of the absolute time is everywhere the same one because she describes a certain "condition" of the world. In the absolute time the time has another meaning than in the time in terms of duration. In the absolute time we describe every time with a certain state of the world. The absolute time can't be observed and be measured. She discloses only by the protrudingly described mental reflection. A principle recognised by mental consideration of the absolute time needs no confirmation by a clock. The absolute time is an innate mind category originates in the course of the evolutionary development of the mind.

The "Psychological Time" depends on the subjective time experience of the individual. We speak of a "sense of time" and finds out that with the waiting the time passes apparently more slowly, while with an amusing engagement the time "fly away". We also speak with pleasure of the "biological clock". It concerns a time feeling which seems to be assessed in the person. Is time only a human construct, is it an anthropogenic time and does have no sense, no existence if we look at them detached from the person?

The "Space Time" describes the Einstein theory of relativity as an inseparable close stooped thing. The more measures an object owns, the more it bends the surrounding space and slows down at the same time the glide of time. This is also valid for moved objects: Faster moved objects are defeated by a slower glide of time than less fast moved (in each case from the point of view of an external observer). The time doesn't pass by everywhere equally fast as ascertained already in the first part of this post. Stephen Hawking concludes from the inseparable of space and time that a glide of time is not conceivable without matter. The question after the time as a graduation for change is unnecessary without availability of any matter. Without matter there would be no reason for the acceptance of the existence of time, because how should this also become apparent? Or simply expressed: Where nothing is, nothing also happens, and where nothing happens, no time also passes, because this graduation is for any change.
Balrog (219 D)
07 Dec 14 UTC
How does it feel to write such a long, whatever it is and have nobody reply to you? :P
Balrog (219 D)
07 Dec 14 UTC
On a serious note, it is a good topic for discussion, and I would have added my two cents; but you know what? It is Finals week.
Time… the ever flowing river...
Goodbye my friend...maybe for, forever....
oscarjd74 (100 D)
07 Dec 14 UTC
But what about the energy? Is it not also the equally omnipresent and mysterious? With what it can transform from the one form into the other. Even into the massive matter and back as Einstein says. And does it be the constant conserved and never changing? But then what of the dark energy that seems to come with the nothing of the expanding universe?
chluke (12292 D(G))
07 Dec 14 UTC
Nice @Strauss!

Time is an illusion. Future time and past time do not exist, because there is no time that is not now.

Yet, at the same time, this current moment in time encompasses every single moment in time, past and future (depending on where you are looking at it from).
Strauss (758 D)
07 Dec 14 UTC
"Time is an illusion. Future time and past time do not exist, because there is no time that is not now."

Legends not the thinkers: The future is a country which nobody owns.
Octavious (2701 D)
07 Dec 14 UTC
(+1)
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so
Thucydides (864 D(B))
08 Dec 14 UTC
"Time is but the stream I go a-fishing in. I drink at it; but while I drink I see the sandy bottom and detect how shallow it is. Its thin current slides away, but eternity remains."

-Thoreau
Thucydides (864 D(B))
08 Dec 14 UTC
In my uninformed opinion, motion and time are equivalent phenomena.
Thucydides (864 D(B))
08 Dec 14 UTC
@oscarjd re:energy

Energy is defined by energy's ability to produce motion, no? Energy without time is not energy, isn't that right? Energy depends on time. Time is more fundamental. And of course we are beginning to understand that space is the product of energy (dark energy), not some background property of the universe.

To me there are two major axes in the development of the universe. I'm not sure what you might call them. I use "Order" and "Chaos."

To me, gravity represents Chaos, or entropy. The tendency of everything to break down, fall down, and homogenize. Order is the energy of the big bang, which is slowly dying away as entropy advances. Time can be thought of as the line which connects the two - the thing that takes us from a highly ordered state - the singularity of the Big Bang, to a highly disordered state - a vast, empty field of background energy, slowly dying off, till no energy is left, and the lights shut off. I think at this point, time would stop. I tend to think that time relies on physical objects to "tick forward," because I don't think there is some metaphysical time clock. If nothing in the universe moves, time has stopped. And so time is the very functioning of the universe itself - the force that brings us from the beginning to the end, the force that set it in motion in the first place.

Thus, time is God.
ghug (5068 D(B))
08 Dec 14 UTC
(+1)
You're making fun of yourself at this point, right?
Valis2501 (2850 D(G))
08 Dec 14 UTC
(+4)
In 1884, meridian time personnel met
in Washington to change Earth time.
First words said was that only 1 day
could be used on Earth to not change
the 1 day bible. So they applied the 1
day and ignored the other 3 days.
The bible time was wrong then and it
proved wrong today. This a major lie
has so much evil feed from it's wrong.
No man on Earth has no belly-button,
it proves every believer on Earth a liar.

Children will be blessed for
Killing Of Educated Adults
Who Ignore 4 Simultaneous
Days Same Earth Rotation.
Practicing Evil ONEness -
Upon Earth Of Quadrants.
Evil Adult Crime VS Youth.
Supports Lie Of Integration.
1 Educated Are Most Dumb.
Not 1 Human Except Dead 1.
Man Is Paired, 2 Half 4 Self.
1 of God Is Only 1/4 Of God.
Bible A Lie & Word Is Lies.
Navel Connects 4 Corner 4s.
God Is Born Of A Mother –
She Left Belly B. Signature.
Every Priest Has Ma Sign
But Lies To Honor Queers.
Belly B. Proves 4 Corners.

Your dirty lying teachers
use only the midnight to
midnight 1 day (ignoring
3 other days) Time to not
foul (already wrong) bible
time. Lie that corrupts earth
you educated stupid fools.

GoBelly-Button Logic Works.

When Do Teenagers Die?
Adults Eat Teenagers Alive,
No Record Of Their Death.
Father Son Image, Not Gods.
Every Man Born Of Woman.


Belly-Button Is the Signature
Of Your Personal Creator -
I Believe Her Name Mama.

Pastor Told His Flock That
God Created All Of Them -
Truth Was That They All had
Mama Made Belly Buttons,
Church Was Full Of Liars.

Earth Has 4 Days In Same 24 Hrs., 1 Day God Was Wrong.
Einstein Was ONEist Brain.

Try My Belly-Button Logic.

No God Knows About 4 Days, It Is Evil To Ignore 4 Days,

Does Your Teacher Know ?


Fraudulent ONEness of religious
academia has retarded your opposite
rationale brain to a half brain slave.
YOU IGNORE 3 OF 4 DAYS -
FORCE 4 DAYS ON EARTH,
THEY ALREADY EXIST.
4 HORSEMEN HAVE 4 DAYS
IN ONLY 1 EARTH ROTATION.
4 ANGLES STOOD ON 4 CORNERS.
4 CORNERS ROTATE TO 16 CORNERS
WHICH EQUAL TO 4 CORNER DAYS.
TEACHERS ARE EVIL LIARS - THE
ONEness OF GOD IS STILLness DEATH.
YOU WERE ONEness RETARD ON THE
EARTH OPPOSITES ALL YOUR LIFE.
LOVE OF GOD IS HATE OF CHILDREN.
SUPPORT TIMECUBE OR BE CURSED.
EARTH HAS 4 CORNER
SIMULTANEOUS 4-DAY
TIME CUBE
WITHIN SINGLE ROTATION.
4 CORNER DAYS PROVES 1
DAY 1 GOD IS TAUGHT EVIL.
IGNORANCE OF TIMECUBE4
SIMPLE MATH IS RETARDATION
AND EVIL EDUCATION DAMNATION.
CUBELESS AMERICANS DESERVE -
AND SHALL BE EXTERMINATED.
WardenDresden (239 D(B))
08 Dec 14 UTC
^ What the actual fuck?

Back to the topic of time, I don't have enough of a scientific background to tackle anything related to spacetime or any sort of external or absolute time, but I think anyone can discuss subjective time and the conceptualizations of it.

All of our demarcations of time are, of course, arbitrary. Days, weeks, months, years, seconds, and so on. A society could theoretically function with any subdivision of time established and followed as long as that subdivision is useful for that society. I think this is generally understood, and there have been plenty of imagined societies that use different divisions of time. But even in science fiction, I think it's difficult to have any sort of society without that society having a concept and division of time. I feel like it's a requirement of intelligence to distinguish between what is, what was, and what is to come. Without that, how could an organism understand cycles, patterns, create plans, or show any other traits we associate with intelligence?

So as far as I'm concerned, time is a part of evolved intelligence, and a vital one to the way we understand the universe.
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
08 Dec 14 UTC
(+1)
For the unenlightened: http://www.timecube.com/
ghug (5068 D(B))
08 Dec 14 UTC
(+1)
It's blankflag's manifesto.
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
08 Dec 14 UTC
(+1)
What the actual fuck
ag7433 (927 D(S))
08 Dec 14 UTC
This is my favorite part:

"The bible time was wrong then and it
proved wrong today. This a major lie
has so much evil feed from it's wrong.
No man on Earth has no belly-button,
it proves every believer on Earth a liar."
Jamiet99uk (873 D)
08 Dec 14 UTC
Is this the time thread or the bible thread? I'm confused.
Thucydides (864 D(B))
09 Dec 14 UTC
No I'm actually pretty serious ghug, though I full acknowledge my above post is speculative.
Thucydides (864 D(B))
09 Dec 14 UTC
But it's a pretty good question: why doesn't time every run backwards? Are we confident that when the universe is finally quiet and nothing is moving, that it won't all just run backward? Lol
ag7433 (927 D(S))
09 Dec 14 UTC
For a sum zero existence, it will need to run backwards in the future. Or is it running backwards now in parallel.
ghug (5068 D(B))
09 Dec 14 UTC
Thucy, I don't even know where to start. How the hell are order and chaos different axes? What's the inherent connection between energy and time? How does this all make time God? What is four corner day when ONEness is rampant in society of SnotBrains? Why do educated sinners refuse to acknowledge harmonic oscillation of four corner day rotating together? Does any god equate simultaneous four day creation? Why Wikipedia claim that the Time Cube is non-science when this constitutes a Grave error by the half-brain bastard who can't think opposite of the lies he was taught?
Thucydides (864 D(B))
09 Dec 14 UTC
No it's along one axis. The connection between energy and time is that energy is equivalent to motion, and motion and time go hand in hand, or are possibly the same thing. All descriptions time passing, all attempts to answer the question "why doesn't everything happen at once", will actually be describing motions. Things move through space, one moment at a time. If nothing moved, time would not pass. On what basis would you say time passes if nothing was in motion, if there was no energy left in the universe? My feeling is that once all motion stops, history ends, and time stops. Thus you have a single axis from the Big Bang, the highest energy and the least entropy, which was set into motion and started time, and we advanced along that line forward through time, and chaos increases as we go.

I don't think anything I've said is particulary hare-brained. It is certainly speculative and may not be true but I also think that it's not against any of the current understandings of what time and space are.
JECE (1253 D)
09 Dec 14 UTC
Well history would certainly end, since nothing can be recorded in nothingness.
orathaic (1009 D(B))
09 Dec 14 UTC
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/physics/big-bang-may-created-mirror-universe-time-runs-backwards/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=pbsofficial&utm_campaign=nova_next

Haven't been following this, but there is a connection between engery and time in quantum mechanics, ΔEΔt >= ћ / 2 (similar to how the uncertainty in position and momentum are connected; energy and time are directly related by the uncertainty principle)
Thucydides (864 D(B))
09 Dec 14 UTC
I don't mean history in the sense of observation and record of events, I mean history in the sense of the continuing series of ohenomena that have occurred to this point in time. If nothing was moving any longer, history we be over, and time would no longer move. I feel I must not be the only one who thinks that three dimensional motion is necessarily tied to fourth dimensional motion. The really interesting question is, would anything happen "next"? Would time run backwards? Would it start again with a singularity? Or would it truly be back to the void, eternally? Obviously we will never know.
Thucydides (864 D(B))
09 Dec 14 UTC
@orathaic

Can you elaborate at all? I don't know anything about quantum mechanics
I can do some elaboration for orthaic. First off, before I explain it, you have to understand that quantum mechanics defies all common logic, to the point where it was even avoided by Einstein. He once said, in reference to quantum mechanics, “God does not play dice with the universe.”
That said, I'll give you a rudimentary explanation of it; quantum mechanics is the science of the motion of particles, especially as it pertains to random probability. There are several strange phenomena that occur, like particles spontaneously moving through solid objects (quantum tunneling), 'superfluidity', single particles (technically) existing in multiple places at the same time, quantum teleportation, and quantum entanglement. The last phenomenon, quantum entanglement, has to deal with the 'entanglement' of particles, which allows them to behave in the same manner, instantaneously, across a distance. There's a lot to the more recent theories that have been proposed, and I haven't studied them too in-depth, but they basically say that time is a product of this entanglement, and I've even heard some propositions that model spacetime's behavior as that of a quantum superfluid, which they've even said could possibly lead to the Unified Field Theory. It's a lot to take in, I know, but quantum mechanics is something that I enjoy studying, and I would recommend you to look into it yourself. It's very interesting, and it gives you a completely different view of the universe.
Thucydides (864 D(B))
10 Dec 14 UTC
So if I read you right you're saying some physicists think the universe itself as it progresses through time is exhibiting entanglement? And that's how everything advances through time together? You're right, that is a lot to take in lol
Strauss (758 D)
10 Dec 14 UTC

"Thus, time is God. "

One step after the other one, the journey is the destination. I threw the ball (headword: matter) to you, pick him up and play with it.

What is matter? In the natural-philosophy, matter mostly refers on material entities in demarcation to immaterial entities like energy or fields. In the metaphysics history, single objects was distinguished between a material, conceivable substrate and a geometrical shape - a being shape conceivable by our recognising. Concept-historically and idea-historically especially importantly is the Aristotelian thesis that single objects (primary substances) exist of form and matter (Hylemorphismus).

An other philosophy-historical consideration in the most different contexts of the metaphysics, the philosophy of the mind and the ethics, is the dismissal of material on the one side, and spiritual, mental and living on the other side. Descartes "Matter" is used as a name of the object area spatially of vast objects (res extensa) and is supposed that besides still another object area exists, the area of the spiritual or mental (res cogitans) with which a dualism will represent with regard to material and
mental objects. On these theses, variations face which only one such object area accept (monismus with regard to the material and mental), namely either only material objects as existent look (materialism) or, however, only spiritual as existent look (ontological idealism).

In practical-philosophical contexts as an orientation for the way of good life, the way away from the material to the immaterial-spiritual becomes a higher rank intended. Philosophically was controversial and it is till this day in case of a dualism with regard to material and mental, whether and which kind an interaction exists between both kinds of objects (in addition of detailed dualistic answers to the body-soul-problem).

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz handled the problem of the inter-actionistic dualism - where after an interaction place in the brain must be searched - and didn't develop it in his substance-dualistic variant "Psychophysical Parallelism". The central theses:

1. Mind and matter are two different substances.
2. Nevertheless, both substances don't work on each other.

However, by his thesis equally new questions, for example: If I want to go to the fridge (mentally), I ordinarily also go to the fridge (physically). How can this be if mind and matter don't work at all on each other? The answer of the parallelism in the fact is that spiritual and material events run off parallel to each other, as well as synchronous running watches. The reason for this parallelism, it appears intuitively an unbelievable matter of chance how all spiritual beings of the physical machinery ran precisely in parallel with the mind, Leibniz saw the work of God.

Step by step: Matter, shape, modeler and the mind of nature, pick up the ball: The eye with which God sees you is the eye with which you see him; your eye and his eye are one and the same.
semck83 (229 D(B))
10 Dec 14 UTC
Thucy, the time-energy uncertainty principle says very roughly that if something exists for only a short period of time, then it cannot have a well-defined energy (be it a particle, or a state of a particle). It's a good deal vaguer than other uncertainty relations, but that's the size of it -- to have a completely well-defined energy, you have to be around for awhile.
JamesYanik (548 D)
10 Dec 14 UTC
(+1)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtkGtXtDlQA





There's always a time for a song!



also I pose this question!
If you go to the past, do you change the future, or cause it?








I'm friends with my dad







Dr. Whovians I understand you think you have special understanding because you watch a TV show but that is only a theory don't pass it off as fact.












...but eventually everyone runs out of time.
















DONT HUG ME IM SCARED - 2
JamesYanik (548 D)
10 Dec 14 UTC
holy fuck how did all those spaces get in there sorry about that people








but still my question remains
JamesYanik (548 D)
10 Dec 14 UTC
DAMNIT!!!
Sorry about all of your spaces, but it depends. Are we to assume that a person (on your hypothetical trip to the past) ends up in their own time stream? There are plenty of paradoxes that can be imagined with a single time stream, but in all likelihood on a "trip to the past" in which someone changes an event, the effect would be the creation of a new quantum reality (here we are, back to quantum mechanics and probability).

Or are we to assume that the "trip to the past" simply results in the fulfillment of all the events that had already taken place?
Strauss (758 D)
25 Dec 14 UTC
"If you go to the past, do you change the future, or cause it?"


Time travelling in the future are already possible within the scope of the special theory of relativity. We have already got to know them in connection with the twin's problem. How fast or slowly the time passes for the twins, depends on how they move. Time travelling in the future are possible with it, in principle. For the twin who flies away in the rocket at high speed the trip lasts, for example, only 25 years. The twin, however, who remains on the earth would be already 30 years aged. This would be a trip in the future for the twin younger now, because on the earth already 30 years have passed. In this way we would really be able to do in the future travelling, presumed I dispose of a quick spaceship. There aren't such spaceships yet. So it is only a technical problem.

A trip in the past stands quite on an other sheet. This trip poses much more basic, logical problems. If we accept, I could travel in the past and visit my grandfather, and though at that time, besides, my father yet was not born. I face then my grandfather and shoot him. Now the problems start. I have shot my grandfather, before he could generate my father. So my father has been never born, so he has never generated me. So I have never also built the time machine, so I'm also not traveled, so I have never shot my grandfather. Nevertheless, so my father has been born, nevertheless, I have been born and, nevertheless, have traveled, nevertheless, so I have shot. So I'm not traveled etc. ...

What has really happened now? Have I travelled? Have I not traveled? It originate logical oscillations. Time travelling are in the past extremely problematically, we can't simply describe any more what happens then.
Thucydides (864 D(B))
26 Dec 14 UTC
You never travel into the future. You are always in the present moment
Strauss (758 D)
26 Dec 14 UTC
The earth is blue.

Context?
JamesYanik (548 D)
26 Dec 14 UTC
the closer you are to light speed the slower time moves around you, or, that's the theory. And technically electrons travel through time. For more information here is a link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62E4FJTwSuc
http://www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/
Strauss (758 D)
26 Dec 14 UTC
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/06/Universum.jpg

This woodcut was at school my first lesson in the field history and it has inspired me till this day - it led me to the interesting metaphysics. Today is indisputable that the concept metaphysics is developed from a work of Aristotle (the 14 books of general-philosophical contents) . The peripatetic Andronicus of Rhodes arranged these books behind his eight books of "physics", there originated the name "metaphysics".

"That what stands behind physics in the shelve", or didactically "That, what to the implementation about the nature follows" and also anyhow scientific-systematically means: "That what comes after physics". However, which of both is more original, is argumentative vague under philosophy historians. The meaning at that time of the word remains till this day nebulous, Aristotle didn't use the concept. For the first time it's assigned the concept by Nikolaos of Damascus.

From the late antiquity metaphysics climbed up as an independent philosophical discipline and in the early Middle Ages receives them even the name epopty (look, appreciate). Then, unfortunately, in the 19th century became the adjective "metaphysical" also uses in pejorative manner, e.g., in question, only speculatively, unscientific and non-empiric game of thought. Besides, the aim of the metaphysics is always the knowledge of the basic structure and principles of the reality.

Indeed, meant Immanuel Kant's great Kritizismus (critical philosophy) also for the metaphysics a "Copernican Revolution", he felt, nevertheless, to her universal claim obliges. He wanted to found a metaphysics, witch as science can appear. It had to be examined, whether and how metaphysics is generally feasible. First the foundations and structures of the human knowledge had to be described systematically and the borders of their reach be determined - learn to make a distinction especially between possible and illegitimate knowledge claims.

Kant with his "Critique of Pure Reason" explains the result of the analysis. Knowledge assumes thinking and view, metaphysical objects like God, soul or a world as a whole aren't clear. The traditional metaphysics is impracticable. She must assume a "spiritual view" , a cognitive faculties, without sensuous view access to ideal objects would have. Because we are such property don't own, the traditional metaphysics is bare speculative-constructively. In Kant's view it's in principle not possibly, to come to a rational decision of the central questions, whether gives it a God, a freedom of the will and an immortal soul.

The human reason has the special destiny, that she is bothered by questions which it can't reject - then she are given up them by the nature of the reason, however, also not can answer. Since they exceed all property of the human reason. Outgoing from the practical-moral action Kant tries new grounds of the metaphysics in the criticism of the "Critique of Practical Reason". The practical reason puts up inevitably
postulates whose fulfillment shows the condition of moral action. His summary:

The freedom of the will must be demanded, because a moral law has no sense if there is not at the same time the freedom which should fulfill the law. Also the immortality of the soul is necessary, because the person in his natural existence looking for blessedness, can approach to the moral law only in a progresses going to the infinite. However, this approach keeps only on condition of sense that the death makes them not worthless, but to lends the life out meaning.

Only by the existence of God, however, is guaranteed, that nature and moral law are reconciled, in the end, with each other. God is only conceivable as a being who is cause of the whole nature as well as from a moral disposition acting "intelligence". Kant's in the platonic-aristotelian philosophy rooted perception that the job of the
science exists in recognizing the being or the essence of the things. An example of critical reason: What you don't wish to be done to yourself, don't do to others.


43 replies
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
24 Dec 14 UTC
(+8)
Ban Banning of +1 Whoring
Proposing to ban +1 whoring is the cheapest, most disgraceful form of +1 whoring. If you would like to join the ranks of +1 whores, you must prove yourself worthy. Young padawan Jamiet99uk has not yet done so. Thus, we should ban the banning of +1 whoring.

If you agree, do *not* +1 this post. Thanks.
51 replies
Open
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
25 Dec 14 UTC
(+1)
Today's Number is 50
And on that note, probably quite a few games to take over. Merry Christmas all.
4 replies
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
26 Dec 14 UTC
Kitestring
http://www.elle.com/life-love/society-career/kitestring-app-safety-apps-women?src=spr_FBPAGE&spr_id=1448_53750142&linkId=8004743

In case anyone is interested in a safety/emergency app.
0 replies
Open
tvrocks (388 D)
25 Dec 14 UTC
(+2)
Merry christmas
hannukah ended yesterday
7 replies
Open
Octavious (2701 D)
24 Dec 14 UTC
Best Christmas Movies Of All Time
There is no disputing the top three, but in what order would you rank them?
35 replies
Open
scholzelynx (0 DX)
22 Dec 14 UTC
(+1)
Is it even possible to Win as Austria
Seriously every game I play Austria always gets steamrolled. Is it possible to win as Austria
48 replies
Open
VashtaNeurotic (2394 D)
25 Dec 14 UTC
(+1)
To Those on the East Coast of the United States of America
Merry Christmas! May your life be prosperous and filled with joy.
12 replies
Open
bo_sox48 (5202 DMod(G))
24 Dec 14 UTC
(+1)
Holiday Traditions
It seems that the thing to do on Christmas in Japan is go to KFC. Apparently they think that that is what we do in the US, and my sister, who lives here, told me most people are shocked to hear that KFC is actually closed on Christmas in the states.

What are the weirdest holiday traditions and is there a more successful marketing plan than by KFC in Japan, where hardly anyone actually celebrates Christmas at all?
8 replies
Open
The biggest homosexual on this discussion board
According to Al Swearengen, I am the bearer of this illustrious title. Now, bow before your new fabulous king.
12 replies
Open
Jamiet99uk (873 D)
22 Dec 14 UTC
(+11)
+1 Whoring
I say there should be a forum rule banning threads created just for +1 whoring. It's getting really annoying.

If you agree with me, +1 this thread.
42 replies
Open
abgemacht (1076 D(G))
24 Dec 14 UTC
Best Quotes of 2014
With the year almost up, I'd like to see people's favorite quotes. Post your favorite quote, whom by, and threadID (if you can find it).
9 replies
Open
chluke (12292 D(G))
24 Dec 14 UTC
are game Notes reliable and secure?
How secure and reliable are game Notes under the Notes press tab? I assume no other players can see your Notes, but can admin look at them?
Those of you who use Notes, have you ever had any reliability issues using the Notes tab?
9 replies
Open
Chaqa (3971 D(B))
24 Dec 14 UTC
(+1)
Stop +1 Whoring
It's getting old.
10 replies
Open
Al Swearengen (0 DX)
23 Dec 14 UTC
Special Holiday Game Tomorrow
\0/
3 replies
Open
CommanderByron (801 D(S))
24 Dec 14 UTC
(+1)
Triumvir412 (diplomacy commentary)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMoTFzSHipCJRSRAhQ_aYLg

simply thought you all may enjoy this. I found his commentaries interesting.
he does commentaries on games he has played and this may be useful to any new players out there
6 replies
Open
Yellowjacket (835 D(B))
21 Dec 14 UTC
(+2)
Racism is alive and well in America
As above, below.
102 replies
Open
Page 1222 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top