I have most of the teaching staff for the first game set up. I believe that we are just waiting on one reply now.
As for eligible students . . . after looking at the data, I have loosely applied the GR requirements set out in the earlier post and rigorously applied the standard of no CDs (but didn't apply the standard for number of games played) to arrive at exactly 10 candidates from the list of those interested, which is exactly the number of undergrads we need for 2 games. These 10 candidates are:
Rafaello
Pete U
Eklade
mongoose998
Aeneas17
Jjoey1
Chest Rockwell
JNewton
RoFWaFfLeZ
Still to be determined is who will play in Undergrad 1 (starting next week) and who will play in Undergrad 2. If anybody has a strong preference for playing in Undergrad 1, please let me know here. If any of the teaching staff, and especially the advisers and TAs, for Undergrad 1 have experience with any of these players and would like to request that the student be in Undergrad 1, please PM me.
Now . . . the grad students. We have three eligible:
Bonotow
pastoralan
goldfinger0303
We need 4 more to make this game happen. One possibility is to take people I had signed up to be advisers for this game and have them play, but then we'd be short advisers. Sign up, people!
Anybody who's interested may examine my data here.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AjIF1ox2Vmq5dFJFcnRadTZHbElmRlpOY3NNV0h4aWc&hl=en
An interesting point is that most of you guys have very low message/game ratios. I checked some of the higher ranked players (me, Crazyter, Abgemacht, Ebay), and all of us have M/G ratios of over 100, while most of the players on the student list are under 50. Perhaps your first lesson should simply be to send more press!