Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 341 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
StevenC. (1047 D(B))
18 Aug 09 UTC
New Diplomacy 5: Allies vs Central Powers
more inside....
10 replies
Open
spyman (424 D(G))
18 Aug 09 UTC
Anyone here knowledgable about statistics?
Normally I would try to find an forum that specilizes in this subject but I haven't been too sucessful finding an active forum that I can post too (the few I can find are restricted to invited members only). I tend to find that there's a lot of smart educated people on this site so I thought I might try my luck here.
12 replies
Open
mintsauce (150 D)
18 Aug 09 UTC
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=11444 - Stuck in pause (still)
All players have cancelled pause via button, as suggested by thewonderllama. Still stuck.
1 reply
Open
Gallando (255 D)
16 Aug 09 UTC
webDiplomacy Notifier application in taskbar
I've developed a Win32 taskbar application that monitors webDiplomacy to notify the user when a status change occurs in a game, by changing the icon in the taskbar, depending on the type of notification.
11 replies
Open
kestasjk (64 DMod(P))
13 Aug 09 UTC
Health care reform
I'd like to hear some US opinions on your health care reform (more inside)
259 replies
Open
fortknox (2059 D)
18 Aug 09 UTC
Put in your orders!
I hate having to have to say this, but when you have a game where you have no orders: PUT SOME ORDERS IN! Don't finalize them unless you are sure, but ALWAYS have orders in. That way you don't NMR even when you are active. I've been in one too many games where my ally was going to enter in orders late when he had a chance only to get busy and miss the end of the turn. Don't let it happen to you! Always put in orders! Having two red "!!"'s should be an alert to you to put in orders!
3 replies
Open
cteno4 (100 D)
18 Aug 09 UTC
That Diplomacy-points character
How do you type it into text documents like forum posts and comment threads? I've seen it on here a couple of times.
16 replies
Open
ag7433 (927 D(S))
18 Aug 09 UTC
Publishing
Has anyone had a book published (not self published or ebook), but through a legitimate publisher? I'm curious how incredibly difficult it is.
6 replies
Open
StevenC. (1047 D(B))
18 Aug 09 UTC
Need a new France....
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=12484
2 replies
Open
Parallelopiped (691 D)
18 Aug 09 UTC
Unpause game
Hi - all seven players have voted to unpause the game Stab-Happy. Does anyone know how long we need to wait for before the unpause takes effect? Can it be done immediately?
0 replies
Open
myth1202 (900 D)
18 Aug 09 UTC
Pause game. Quick response needed
Can someone please pause game 12563 ("who needs passwords?? Gunboat nopress")? France announced eraly that he was going away and noone seemed to have problem. Now there are a couple of hours to deadline and I am not sure the paus will pass...

Thanks!
1 reply
Open
amonkeyperson (100 D)
16 Aug 09 UTC
20,000 people convert to Islam each year.
Inside....
75 replies
Open
StevenC. (1047 D(B))
18 Aug 09 UTC
Can a moderator please check this game?
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=12437
1 reply
Open
Carpysmind (1423 D)
17 Aug 09 UTC
Support Question
Can a Fleet in Rom sup a move from Gal to Bud?
8 replies
Open
vamosrammstein (757 D(B))
17 Aug 09 UTC
Movies
I'm sure a lot of people on here all enjoy a good movie, so I thought this would be a good idea to share some of our favorites.
12 replies
Open
ArmaniBoy (100 D)
16 Aug 09 UTC
Racism?
I don't like the name of this guy: http://webdiplomacy.net/profile.php?userID=17393
65 replies
Open
ag7433 (927 D(S))
12 Aug 09 UTC
END WORD Game 2.0
Only play if you try to get to the END WORD.
Example if Start= Wood; End= Car: Wood, Fuel, Gas, CAR!
***This is a game of group collaboration and thought.***
249 replies
Open
Steve1519 (100 D)
17 Aug 09 UTC
Message to judge! ID = 12438
In The Anti-Stab League I am directed to retreat my Russian army in Liverpool to either Clyde (which is currently occupied) or Wales. I'm sorry if I am missing something obvious, but why do I need to retreat?

Thanks for the site.
4 replies
Open
JECE (1248 D)
17 Aug 09 UTC
Record of point gains and losses
Look at these games I joined late in:
gameID=12048
gameID=11819
Obviously, I should not have win 59 D after a bet of 3 in Iberian Lynx. In fact, I did not. The points were originally calculated correctly and I won 6 D in the end. I am only posting this here because I thought this would have been fixed already, and it has no been.
4 replies
Open
Centurian (3257 D)
17 Aug 09 UTC
A View to a Kiel
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=12830
36 hour phases, 50 point bet, WTA
Join up folks!
1 reply
Open
ag7433 (927 D(S))
16 Aug 09 UTC
Humor
Is it me or is nothing funny anymore (on TV / Movies)? Is it me losing my sense of humor, or is the talent going through a dry spell?
37 replies
Open
marestyle (185 D)
17 Aug 09 UTC
Survival
If a player survives a game, does he get a piece of the loot (earn more dollars than he invested)?
2 replies
Open
DingleberryJones (4469 D(B))
16 Aug 09 UTC
Crime and Punishment and Michael Vick
As a lifelong Eagles fan.....
47 replies
Open
Carpysmind (1423 D)
16 Aug 09 UTC
“Civil Disorder” Penalty
What are players thoughts on further penalizing those players who go “CD”? Players that go CD are just as bad as ‘multi-players’ (and in many instances are one in the same). Would it keep players from joining games they were unwilling to finish?
6 replies
Open
lkruijsw (100 D)
17 Aug 09 UTC
FIRST PERSON TO POST WINS!!!!!
Ah ah, that is me! It took me only one message.
2 replies
Open
Crazyter (1335 D(G))
15 Aug 09 UTC
SUN Game Live
anyone interested? At 12 noon EST (GMT-4) if there are at least 5 people, we will do it!
14 replies
Open
sean (3490 D(B))
17 Aug 09 UTC
Any Live Game success stories out there?
1st, do they work? We might try a live game soon in our league game, can anyone out there tell us your live game stories, pitfalls to avoid? tips? timing considerations? thanks
2 replies
Open
mintsauce (150 D)
17 Aug 09 UTC
http://webdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=11444 - Stuck in pause (again)
We've tried every combination of /unpause or pressing the pause button.
1 reply
Open
DingleberryJones (4469 D(B))
13 Aug 09 UTC
Taking the opposing side
So here's a challenge for you all. The topic of marijuana legalization came up a while back and I think most people were in favor of legalization. Practice your powers of persuasion - convince me that marijuana should remain illegal.
Page 3 of 4
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
Chrispminis (916 D)
14 Aug 09 UTC
Ok, after immersing myself in information, I haven't found anything that convinces me marijuana should not be legalized. The best I've found are some papers that demonstrate certain concerns that must definitely be addressed upon legalization of marijuana, but most of these were not new to me, and I don't think pro-legalization advocates are so naive (well there are doubtless some naive ones) not figured this out. However, while I've already mentally rebutted many of the points made in the following argument, it still remains a very important concern, and I leave it as an exercise to some of this forum's legalization supporters to rebut it. It is a cross between real data and trends and an emotional "Think of the children!", but I think it is quite valid, and it comes from the American Association of Pediatrics. I could paraphrase, but I think it is written well enough, mostly sticks to facts and information, and it's good to see the citations in their natural habitat.

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/113/6/e632

I have my criticisms, but I'll give someone else a shot. If I'm not satisfied, I'll weigh in as well. =P
zscheck (2531 D)
14 Aug 09 UTC
grncton,
although i agree you point of driving high should be illegal, truth is that it is pendent on the individual basis. drinking and driving is illegal, yet some people still do it, while others refuse to (such as myself... i have never, and never will drink and drive)
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
14 Aug 09 UTC
unless you do and then the above post is no longer true.
Chrispminis (916 D)
14 Aug 09 UTC
No, the point still stands. You shouldn't punish responsible drinkers for the actions of the irresponsible ones, and the same argument goes for cannabis. Driving while under the influence of either substance would be highly irresponsible and should be punished, but you can't make either substance illegal on the assumption that people will start driving while under the influence.
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
14 Aug 09 UTC
that is true and just look how well it went when the U.S. tried to ban alcohol. I would guess something similar would happen if we now tried it with marijuana.
Chrispminis (916 D)
14 Aug 09 UTC
It's already happening. America and Mexico are paying in green and red.
I love being gone and seeing thing said that should have been. (Toby and Chrisp get credit for having the fun of articulating why this can't be what you want)

I have no reason to respond to DJ's silly "I find it sad you can't participate in an intellectual pursuit like this. " Especially when I said TWICE you illiterate bastage that I didn't want to not that I am not able to waste time.
kestasjk (64 DMod(P))
14 Aug 09 UTC
I smoked a lot as a kid and still do to this day, and for a layman have looked at this quite a bit.

For me marijuana was always cheaper and easier to obtain than alcohol or other drugs, which is why I used it as a kid. The problem is studies on mice have clearly shown that marijuana is by far at its most harmful when children smoke it. I think making it legal could help keep it away from kids, so long as there are very strict rules about reselling it

I have absolutely no problem with adults using it, but it really has to be kept out of the hands of kids
kestasjk (64 DMod(P))
14 Aug 09 UTC
(Still do very occasionally to this day, I should say)
tilMletokill (100 D)
14 Aug 09 UTC
i belive it is safer then alcohol....way safer..i belive weed should be legalized and alcohol should be illegal it is the worst drug
spyman (424 D(G))
14 Aug 09 UTC
Yeah legalize it. Let the grown-ups decide what they want to.
spyman (424 D(G))
14 Aug 09 UTC
...to do
StevenC. (1047 D(B))
14 Aug 09 UTC
You believe it's safer than alcohol? You're gonna need proof because I'm not convinced.
spyman (424 D(G))
14 Aug 09 UTC
Addiction of any kind can be harmful. Being addicted to work can be as bad as a drug.
My feeling is though that if your inclined that way alcohol addiction can kill you much faster that pot. Recently a twenty-two year old man died of cirrhosis of the liver in the UK caused by alcohol. I can't imagine anyone has died that quickly from a disease caused by mary-jane (sorry can't spell right now I am too drunk).
TheGhostmaker (1545 D)
14 Aug 09 UTC
"Perhaps we should have threads arguing for .... the revocation of women's suffrage."

Ah, umm... I've kinda already done this.

My school (all boys) is next door to an all-girls school. We have an annual inter-school debate, and this year (atmysuggestionnowshush) the motion was "This house regrets the emancipation of women". There were relatively few women in the audience (read about a dozen) and well over 100 boys. We won by above 100 (we couldn't be bothered to count) to about 30.
@Sayjo "I have no reason to respond to DJ's silly "I find it sad you can't participate in an intellectual pursuit like this. " Especially when I said TWICE you illiterate bastage that I didn't want to"

Actually, you said you didn't want to. You said you couldn't. Twice. "I can't. Those who think they can for me.... **ROFL** " "I said I couldn't partake in the opposition"
You DIDN'T say you didn't want to. You said you couldn't.
grncton (672 D)
14 Aug 09 UTC
I think that a lot of people here could probably give this side of the argument a better treatment if they really tried but aren't putting in the effort. I'm going out of town and probably won't be able to follow up, but here's an attempt to keep things moving.

1) To anyone using the "safety" argument (i.e., THC is less harmful and less addicting than alcohol): I found this chart very interesting - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rational_scale_to_assess_the_harm_of_drugs_(mean_physical_harm_and_mean_dependence).svg. Apparently, GHB (the date rape drug) is both less harmful and less addicting than THC, so anyone arguing that THC should be legalized should also support the legalization of GHB.

2) Back to the driving argument: This was shrugged off with the claim that overly wide bans on a substance for the purpose of improving road safety aren't justified. But look at alcohol. In the US, you get full legal rights at 18 - except drinking, which happens at 21. This is due to a campaign against young drunk driving in the 1980s - the drinking age is set by federal highway laws. The result is a full ban against anyone under age 20 drinking, even though some may be able to do it responsibly, and yet it has had a significant impact in reducing drunk driving incidents. With current marijuana laws, the same effect happens - there are very few high driving incidents. The fact that a statute is overbroad does not mean that it can't be extremely effective at achieving its goals.
kestasjk (64 DMod(P))
14 Aug 09 UTC
1) No-one wants to be able to buy GHB. If more than 50% of people want a drug legalized (and at the moment it's not too much less for marijuana if you can believe polls) then you'd expect in a democracy it'd be legalized. Since no-one wants GHB there's no risk of that. Also anesthetics are safe if used correctly, but anesthetics and GHB can have harmful applications

2) Haven't been following the "driving argument", but it doesn't sound too important
spyman (424 D(G))
14 Aug 09 UTC
I find it hard to believe that GHB is less harmful than THC. GHB (in Australia this is often referred to as Fantasy) is really is to OD on. Their is a fine line between a safe level and a dangerous level resulting in coma and even death (mainly when combinded with alcohol or other drugs such as ecstasy). I have never heard of anyone falling into a coma because of marijuana.
spyman (424 D(G))
14 Aug 09 UTC
typo... really easy to OD on [GHB]
@DJ Gasp you're a prescriptivist!!!
Sayjo, no, you've said you COULD participate. That's a big difference from WILL not. But you got snide at me saying 'I won't respond to you because I've already told you twice...' No, you hadn't told me at all, but whatever. Can't, won't. Fine, stop posting then.
groverloaf (1381 D)
14 Aug 09 UTC
I would say that most arguments against legalization are rooted in basic moralistic notions that drugs are "wrong." As I understand the science, studies, and literature, marijuana is not really a "gateway drug", nor is it more "unsafe" "addictive" than alcohol, and it's pretty clear that minors can get their hands on drugs as easier, if not easier, than alcohol.

So, if I were to argue the view that marijuana should remain illegal, it seems the primary arguments must be economic. Here in California, medical marijuana is legal. In my East Bay neighbor of Oakland, the city just raised a tax on the sales made by the handful of marijuana dispensaries that act legally. One of the arguments that was bandied about was that if the government legalizes weed and regulates and taxes it, you then have a situation where there can be a black market to buy untaxed and unregulated weed on the cheap. The comparison, I guess, was to buying moonshine from your local hillbilly rather than the stuff at the liquor store which is highly taxed. Or the fact that people really do drive to North Carolina to buy untaxed cigarettes and then sell them in states like California where the taxes are high. The concern was that if this black market remained, then you still have the risk for a criminal syndicate to grow around that black market, just like the current gang violence which is based in large part around the drug trade.

I would say this is a weak claim and the risks are minor. Also, once a culture of legalized and regulated marijuana is accepted, people are likely to simply buy the taxed stuff rather than their black market dealer--just like the vast majority of people buy their smokes and booze from legitimate retailers, rather than the black market. But at least the logic of this argument is more or less sound.

The other arguments I have heard are about reduced productivity--that people are going to become stoners, and go to work high or not go to work at all, and the ease of access to drugs will increase this. I'm largely unconvinced, but then again I have many friends who are huge stoners and really don't do much with their lives. Of course, I don't think legalization would change their lack of motivation.

Finally, I have heard arguments about the health-care costs of marijuana, and that legalization could increase the incidence of lung or mouth cancer, or things like that. Once again, the increased costs would seem marginal to me, and certainly pale in comparison to cigarettes which remain legal.

So, I'm not sure I actually did what DJ wanted--trying to present the arguments in favor of prohibition--rather than simply discredited additional arguments. Oh well.
Although I can hardly give an opinion on how safe marijuana is, I can tell you this:

I am a rising senior in high school with a couple of friends who recently (1 year ago) started smoking pot. Since then, I have watched their lives deteriorate.

And the thing is this: These kids weren't fuck ups. They were intelligent human beings with a future ahead of each one them.
And with college on the horizon, you'd think intelligence would be something of value in their lives.
jmo1121109 (3812 D)
14 Aug 09 UTC
Here is the flaw in your logic, the US is legalizing marijuana to help those with legitimate medical need. Pharmacies are not going to just give out these drugs to ant "intelligent human beings" who want them. I actually think we are going to see a decline in the amount of people using marijuana illegally due to the fact the government is now actually concerned with controlling the substance.
On another note, the legalization of marijuana is not going to impact those people who are addicted to the substance already. If a person is truly set on the idea of using drugs marijuana is a convenient substance, for the reasons kestasjk gave, but not the only one, a person can crush common drugs and OD for a similar effect. After weighing all the arguments I honestly think that legal marijuana will help those with legitimate medical need more then it will harm any potential or current drug addicts.
DJ is a bitch
StevenC. (1047 D(B))
15 Aug 09 UTC
Enough with the fighting. This post is about marijuana legalization.
No it isn't!!! It's about keeping it illegal everyone is just posting the opposite of what DJ wanted.
lilone223 (100 D)
15 Aug 09 UTC
my cousin and aunt died on marijuana so yes that crap needs to be illegal to over counter dealing and crap but medically its debatibal

Page 3 of 4
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

110 replies
digitsu (1254 D)
17 Aug 09 UTC
lets never start a 'last person to post wins' thread again.
its juvenile.
9 replies
Open
Page 341 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top