I explained above. I'll explain again.
I think that earning credibility is an important goal of townies (and mafia as well, as I stated at the outset). If our town is effective, then making posts that help us get towards our win condition should earn credibility. That credibility is good (when assigned correctly to townies) because it helps townies lead votes, it avoids getting townies lynched, and it makes mafia (who are artificial and insincere) stand out.
The only way that I have pursued credibility is by doing by best to (1) find mafia, (2) explain why the people I suspect are indeed mafia, and (3) encourage the town to perform better.
To judge me on a comment I made about myself, and about the mafia game in general, rather than by the content of the posts and my activity that I was characterizing is foolish. You have read my contributions. You can see that they are time-consuming, effective, and sincere attempts to help our town perform better. Maybe you disagree with my characterization fo the goal of a townie. Fine. That is all semantics. What matters if you can see from my contributions that I am sincerely trying to help town, or not. Judge me on my content, not on my meta-characterizations (which I still stand by, by the way).
In any event, I think the wagon that has sprung on me at this late stage is very informative. It is now my best evidence against Espi.