I hate that I'm away with shit internet connection because this is shit I've actually taught at some point and there are some important things to say about homeopathy.

The first is this: homeopathy rests on the belief that if you give someone something that will CAUSE the symptoms he suffers from, it will help him get better.
The second thing of importance is this: you can't just give that something to the person, you must first dilute it in water to such an extent that any active potential that this thing had will be brought down to nil. What matters, what will actually cure you according to homeopathy, is how the water will keep a MEMORY of the active ingredient, and it is that memory that is supposed to cure you.

The London Scientific Association (or something like that, probably has Royal in it, can't look it up cause of shit internet) has offered 10million pounds to the first scientist who can prove that water actually has something like a memory. Many have tried, none have collected.
There is also no experential data that proves to ANY DEGREE that the principles on which homeopathy rests are valid. NONE. ZERO. Please do the research on this properly (not just fucking Wikipedia-shit) before you claim anything else. The placebo effect seems to cover every case where a patient was said to do better under homeopathic treatment. And a placebo effect is not something owned by the pharma world or the scientific method. The placebo effect is a way to capture a phenomenon that is observable beyond the reach of traditional occidental medicine. It has something to do with suggestion (hypnosis is not the right word, but that too is a case of suggestion): placebo effects are greatly improved when the person giving the pill has a special standing in the patient's beliefs. A "nobody" would have a really hard time creating any such effect in a patient.

The debate is not about Homeopathy vs. Occidental Medicine. The question merely is: can we OBSERVE any tangible data which would attest to the truth of the principles on which homeopathy rests. The answer, for the past 150 years or so, has been a resounding NO.
As for nathuropathy, that's a completely distinct question and I have not researched on that topic. As far as I know, however, there does seem to be some data that shows that the "meds" used by naturopaths have some real effects on patients.