@Bozo - I have 5 posts before Spirit vote. Start reading the thread or learn how to use Peter's tool. My vote is still on you.

@Ezio - Why you scumread everybody voting Bozo?

He's lurking

RD you and Maniac seemed opportunistic.

Does MF lurk as scum?

@Ezio - Why opportunistic? I find weird someone is lurking badly and magically shows after someone vote him. Not all lurkers are scum, but why someone town intentionally lurk in a vanilla game?

https://imgur.com/a/mEPyT

And with that I leave you. Im hoping to see Ezio lynched when I return from my sinister nerd-activity

Because I do it all the time. I don't like getting lynched and lurking's a good way to get lynched.

*to not get lynched.

@Ezio - I agree town should try to avoid being lynched, but one vote isn't a big threat, is it? Also, not talking just favors scum in a vanilla setup. But I still fail to understand why pressuring someone is scummy to you? Just defend yourself and lurk seems a lot more scummy to me.

Pressuring lurkers is easy. Free towncred and might get a wagon started on a good player who's not being active d1.

I won't be on for phase end unless i somehow manage to get my break around that time at work. Soooooooo please avoid the urge to eat me while my back is turned. k thx biiiii

@Ezio - Are you deliberately twisting what I say or I am not being clear enough? I am not advocating policy eat lurkers, but pressuring someone that is intentionally lurking.
Could you explain why Bozo is a good player on your opinion?

RD do you have a reason for scumreading Bozo other than him lurking?

Yaaaaaawwn

@Ezio - I am not voting Bozo because of lurking (there are far worst lurkers), but because of his defensiveness (showing only when people vote him).

snowy801 page 10 "how is it never a problem when literally everyone but me calls people retarded but when I do it it's the apocalypse"

Snowy, I think you abstain from that shit because you have some style.

Vecna should check out the bot game status page to figure out the time left to deadline. (mafia.peterlund.se) Anyhow DL is 23:00 CET this evening. Even if I am tired after a long work day I think I will make it.

Regarding Vecna's case on Ezio:

http://mafia.peterlund.se/e/web/msgs?user=Vecna+Ezio&word=Ezio&part=10-12&g=32&UorW=true

I have been reading this links search result again and again and I agree that it does not look good for Ezio. On page 7 I listed Ezio as a good alternative lynch, and Vecna is reinforcing this idea of mine.

《《 Official Vote Count 1.4 》》
ghug (4) peterlund DemonOverlord* Oztra ubercacher16
Heywood Jablowme (2) guak CommanderByron
bozotheclown (2) rdrivera2005 Maniac
Ezio (2) Vecna snowy801
No‑Lynch (1) Ezio
Maniac (1) bo_sox48
CommanderByron (1) MoscowFleet
Chaqa (1) RagingIke297
rdrivera2005 (1) SpiritoftheRadio
guak (1) bozotheclown
Vecna (1) ghug
End-votes ghug (1/10): DemonOverlord

Non-votes: Chaqa, Heywood Jablowme

2.5 hours remain in day 1
《《 ghug is scheduled to be eaten 》》

Chaqa is scheduled to be replaced (no vote)
Spirit is scheduled to be replaced (1 post)

Heywood Jablowme is scheduled to be modkilled (no votes, no posts)

@Ezio - 'Maniac - He wasn't wrong, but it was just useless.' - I might have this as my epitaph.

@PeterLund, why are you still voting me for a joke I made on page one?

Ditto Uber. I expect it from the other two.

So from what I can tell the only real wagons are on me and Bozo, as the ghug wagon seems like a joke wagon that's randomly survived.
@Bozo, why're you voting Guak?

@ghug. I have not seen any retraction from your side yet. And I have note that Ezio still is voting no-lynch not daring to take any kind of stance...

I don't like the fact that every single vote on Ghug is at least 10 pages old and all the people on Ghug have voted exactly once.

##GM NOTE if you get bored, try reading the abbreviated names in the vote tracker in a sentence.

boz bo_ Cha Com Dem Ezi ghu gua Hey Man Mos Ozt pet Rag rdr sno Spi ube Vec

@Ezio … “Vecna was the only one who pointed out the problem with NoLynch: it doesn't get us more information.”

First of all, that’s not a test. That’s just obvious. Second of all, I did too, only sarcastically. Get your facts straight.

@ghug … “He's advocated a no lynch in like five consecutive games, always as town.“

I thought you knew what WIFOM was, and I thought you didn’t like it. I didn’t think you were dumb enough to use it.

@snowy … you voted Maniac for all of 60 seconds, literally, and made a case, and then dipped on a sheep vote. What the fuck.

##CALL GM - why are you publicizing who gets replaced and who gets modkilled before it happens? That’s literally giving us intel. Thanks

##VOTE Chaqa, and Spirit should be a wagon too.

##GM NOTE we are telling you because we have two subs for three inactive players. However we have procured a third sub. So there will be no modkills presumably.

Also the reason heywood would be modkilled is that his failure to vote and post is most egregious of the three violations. It has zilch to do with alignment. :)

Right, good save. I don't believe you. I think you pulled a bo_sox and fucked up. I'm going to work. Enjoy the deadline.

##vote ghug chasing low-hanging fruit