Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 159 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
kestasjk (64 DMod(P))
21 Oct 08 UTC
Monetization via distributed processing ?
After the trial a week ago distributed processing seems to be a potentially effective way to monetize the site without irritating ads or premium accounts. It's not as lucrative, but it is better and more consistent than donations, and it would still provide an incentive for me to work on the more mundane coding which I'm otherwise not interested in

I think most people would gladly trade some (otherwise unused) CPU usage while playing to see further development on the site (and perhaps leave their browsers open as an alternative to direct donation).
But I'd like to hear from those who experienced crashes a week ago, it was the only negative aspect of the trial and it seemed to only be a small subset of Firefox 3.0.1 users, so hopefully it can be resolved and I can go ahead with it
139 replies
Open
Churchill (2280 D)
28 Oct 08 UTC
Why was Good Times-2 drawn?
Not all of the players voted for a draw, and now I have received less points than I paid to buy-into the game.
Could a Moderator/Administrator explain and possibly rectify the situation?
13 replies
Open
diegobarcos (1520 D)
29 Oct 08 UTC
Maggie Simpson - 250p game
Hello all. I just created a 250 point / 36 hour game. Feel free to join.
0 replies
Open
PirateJack (400 D)
25 Oct 08 UTC
Suicide bombing as a method of revenge: Good or Bad?
Message down below >_>.
28 replies
Open
blahblab78 (100 D)
29 Oct 08 UTC
an easy game of diplomacy is under the name blahblah
learning how to play and learn strategies, doesnt care if wins just wants to learn how one wins
2 replies
Open
EdiBirsan (1469 D(B))
29 Oct 08 UTC
Massive NMR's in -01 why do you punish yourselves this way?
I just looked at the open games and found two that stand out with 3 or 4 countries that did not move in 1901. Why are you all remaining people playing these games? Call for a draw and end the misery. It is not Diplomacy if you do not have 7 active players.
1 reply
Open
Spell of Wheels (4896 D)
29 Oct 08 UTC
Blue Danube
52 points to join....36 hour turns....PPSC.
Need 4 more!
0 replies
Open
maintgallant (100 D)
27 Oct 08 UTC
Rules Download
New to the game and the site... where do I download a complete set of rules? The obvious ones I get, but the more remote ones I'm having trouble with. For instance, if I make an attack out of a country, can an army retreat into it from if dislodged out of another area (not where the attack is directed)? Is my support to a third country cut when the army attacking me is dislodged?
6 replies
Open
kestasjk (64 DMod(P))
28 Oct 08 UTC
To Linux users:
They're giving out free copies of Crossover Office today, fyi

http://lameduck.codeweavers.com/
2 replies
Open
Otto Von Bismark (653 D)
27 Oct 08 UTC
500 Point Buy in Game
Ok lets try this better to find people who want in. Who is in?
10 replies
Open
Jacob (2466 D)
28 Oct 08 UTC
New 20-pt game: Here I Stand
Join! =)
0 replies
Open
defiant1214 (100 D)
28 Oct 08 UTC
Joining Mistake Quesiton
Any way to quit a game you joined by mistake before it starts?
7 replies
Open
TheMasterGamer (3491 D)
27 Oct 08 UTC
@moderators or Kestas
I took over a cd in game http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=6148 only to find that all the other players had voted for a draw in a paused game. What are our options now? If I allow the game to be drawn, what is my return on my investment in points? Might I be permitted to be removed from the game, as if I had never joined, so that I do not take a "draw"?
26 replies
Open
Cuchulainn (100 D)
28 Oct 08 UTC
Password Change
Is it possible to change your password?
1 reply
Open
whalen (373 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
The American Empire...
I feel always more interested in using this Forum for non-dip conversations... I wonder how strange other folks see that. Anyway, here we go.
Page 1 of 5
FirstPreviousNextLast
 
whalen (373 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC

The American empire (social, political, financial, military, and otherwise,) and all it entails, seems much besieged lately. Near historical market 'fluctuations,' terrorist attacks, and low international opinion of America, in addition to a lethargic and anemic political exercise and response seem to bode poorly for the American/Western system.

I generally don't like to discuss nation state topics as they are often myopic, however, the American system/empire means much more than simply the US.
So, Dip players... Is the American system/empire in permanent and terminal decline? Or is this simply the turning of a new chapter of American international dominance (neocon or otherwise?...) Futher, what does this mean for the world, whichever position you take?
aoe3rules (949 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
Well, the EU or China could easily crush us if they wanted to, and the CIS could as well if they were willing to use nukes.
Centurian (3257 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
I don't know how they might easily crush us. Militarily the States could take on either of them easily and global economies are too integrated to allow anyone to make any particular action against the states there,
Wellington (0 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
No human institution can last forever. The US's dominance will end someday.

However, reports of the death of the American empire have been greatly exaggerated. The current financial crisis, while no lark, is being greatly overhyped because of the impending general election. On the terrorism front, whatever you think of Bush policies, there have been no successful terrorist attacks on US domestic targets since 9/11, and Al Qaeda seem to be losing most of the eggs the staked on the Iraq basket. As for low international opinion, being a superpower is a thankless job. Great Britain, Rome, and the rest were all hated in their age, but if you're a superpower, do you really need to be loved by your clients?

The fact is that as things are, the US is needed. I wish it weren't true, but someone has to be the world's policeman. The US, for all its warts and sins, has the best record of any empire in history for intervening with restraint and then pulling out when the mission's over, doing their best to leave the locals in better shape than before.

America will fall someday, but I hope not too soon, and when it finally happens I hope for the sake of the world's people of good will that America's successor is even half as benevolent.

Long Live the Empire!
DeliciousWolf (112 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
I assume Wellington, you are American? Because that was the biggest load of B.S. I've read in a while.

"The US, for all its warts and sins, has the best record of any empire in history for intervening with restraint and then pulling out when the mission's over, doing their best to leave the locals in better shape than before."

Thanks! I needed a laugh today!
CJ 92 (179 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
America's a good country gone temporarily bad and dragging every other country with it and not just economically. Don't worry though if the world's a sane and proper place America will go back to its usual good and bring everyone else back with it.
Sicarius (673 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
America's usual good? at what point in history was america 'good'?
Darwyn (1601 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
"The fact is that as things are, the US is needed. I wish it weren't true, but someone has to be the world's policeman. The US, for all its warts and sins, has the best record of any empire in history for intervening with restraint and then pulling out when the mission's over, doing their best to leave the locals in better shape than before."

wow, someone graduated from the school of Rove...and celebrated with a game of baseball and apple pie while draped the American flag.

I was going to retort, but you can just as easily take the exact opposite of the above paragraph as my opinion.
Sicarius (673 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
it kindof seems like these kinds of disscussions are populated, about half and half with people who read alot, are fairly intelligent and articulate, get their information form numerous sources, and the other half with people who really love fox news and have a bust of darth cheyney on their headboard.

being proud of your country is one thing, but when patriotism clouds your judgement, it becomes ignorance
Darwyn (1601 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
Agreed Sicarius.
Sicarius (673 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
weird to see that here
Schlort (144 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
OK, whether I agree with Wellington or not, I take issue with you guys who are beating up on him. If you assert that his statement about the US having the best record for using restraint and then pulling out is BS, then give an example of somebody who has a better record. I don't think he was referring to only recent history as it seems Darwyn is assuming. Look at the last century or more. How many times has the US got sucked into a war it really didn't want, only to win, then pull out, AND give the losers money?
Sicarius (673 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
lets see... (counts in head) none.
trim101 (363 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
yeah schlort come on and give some examples then
Invictus (240 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
Well actually you we rebuilt Germany and Japan after World War II, financed Germany after World War I, paid Spain for the Philippines after the Spanish-American War, & rebuilt the South. No to mention aid to South Korea and South Vietnam, and all the investment in Iraq and Afghanistan, rightly or wrongly. We also gave Grenada money, I believe.

So don't beat up so much on America. Considering what we're been in a position to do, we've shown considerable restrain. The British took all of India and France had half of Africa.
valoishapsburg (314 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
Well, The USA did provide large funds to rebuild Europe after WWII, especially Germany. In the case of both wars there was a fairly large isolationist sentiment among the people and politicians. However, it was in the interest of the United States to give funds to its allies and occupied areas to help prevent Soviet domination of the area.

I dont think the USA is perfect, and has done some horrible things, but it is interesting to see how many people think it is so positively evil now. It is not the evil empire so many people think it to be, and the problems it faces are rather recent. It's like every other country, it has its good moments and its bad moments
valoishapsburg (314 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
Our involvement involvement in South Vietnam was simply us taking over for the french in the region and our fear of China and russia having control in the region.

But yes, for a country as powerful as the US has been it certainly has refrained from the kind of colonization that Europe was intersted in. USA did recieve many colonies from Spain after the war though, some of which still havent been given up. But America also hasnt fought its colonies the way some European powers such as France has
RampantLion (937 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
Extremely optimistic quote of the day:
"Be courageous! Whatever setbacks America has encountered, it has always emerged as a stronger and more prosperous nation...."
"Be brave as your fathers before you. Have faith and go forward"
-Thomas Edison
I bet none of you were expecting that!
DeliciousWolf (112 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
The U.S. history of Foreign Intervention and War has always, always been in service of American foreign interests or expansion. That's fine. But don't go around claiming that America is using it's military to 'help the world'. The U.S. has plenty of times chosen to overthrow democracies, support dictatorships, and to sit aside and let war and genocide occur where it doesn't see an immediate self-serving interest, WW1 and WW2 being perfect examples.

Americans, stop claiming the Gov't and Military is helping, or 'policing' the world, because the world doesn't believe it, and your only demonstrating your self-ignorance. I love Americans, but fuck your ignorant.
DeliciousWolf (112 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
And, oh yeah, "Spreading Democracy" is just a euphemism for enlarging American Interests where convenient. I'll be happy to give you plenty of examples of America over-throwing popularly elected Democracies when it suits them, but lets start with with Iran, Chile, and Ecuador.
Invictus (240 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
I'd like to point out that all the pro-American posts have been well organized and polite while the anti-American ones are full of hate.

You foreigners are the crazy ones, you don't even have the right football!
valoishapsburg (314 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
I'm not saying America should be policing the world, but you seem to think that America can only do wrong. America is not alone in those actions. Every country is self serving. Of course the government does things when it is in its interest to do so, but that is true of any government. What I am trying to say is that whatever government you are under is no better than the one I am under.
RampantLion (937 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
To clarify: I was responding to the original point about the decline of the American Empire, not about America's foreign interventions being righteous.
trim101 (363 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
@invitus more people play football than "american football" where you use your hands not your feet the majority of people arent wrong in their naming so stop proving deliciouswolfs ignorant comment right
Invictus (240 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
You take it all so seriously! This is the real problem with the world, people can't take a joke.
Darwyn (1601 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
"then give an example of somebody who has a better record"

There's no need. We can simply point out that it's BS. I'm not going to do the research for you, it's easily attainable...the fact is that US imperialism has caused hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of deaths worldwide just from the beginning of the last century. Just for example: Phillipines c. 1900, Haiti c. 1915, Nicaragua c. 1902, Dominican Republic c. 1916, Honduras c. 1903.

That doesn't even mention the support the US gives to pro-western dictators like the Shah of Iran, Pol Pot, Pinochet, Noreiga, Hussein...the list goes on.

There's a LOT of history that the US education system neglects to tell you.

The statement Wellington made, with all due respect, was ignorant and naive.

Don't get me wrong, I'm very pro-American. It's ...but let's not pretend that the good even comes close to outweighing the bad.

"How many times has the US got sucked into a war it really didn't want"

Another good example. You think the US elite didn't want any of those wars?! Sure the people did not. But again, let's not pretend that war isn't the biggest business there ever is/was, loaded with astronomical profit.

When it comes to money, people can be relatively easily fooled.

P.S. I'm American.
RampantLion (937 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
I don't think Invictus was completely serious about the football comment, trim101.
RampantLion (937 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
Oh, sorry. He already said so himself.
Darwyn (1601 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
But to answer the topic question...the US is in permanent decline. Our government is paving the way toward globalism...next stop, the North American Union.
RampantLion (937 D)
18 Oct 08 UTC
Permanent decline? Did you not read the above quote I referenced? That should have explained everything!

Page 1 of 5
FirstPreviousNextLast
 

146 replies
mac (189 D)
28 Oct 08 UTC
Timestamps
A question and 2 proposals - see first comment.
5 replies
Open
SlkySmoothOtter (969 D)
26 Oct 08 UTC
Cheaters
In a recently initiated game (Good times-2), 5 accounts were made and joined a 100 point game all together and all within one hour of each other. Additionally, they all submitted and finalized orders within this same hour and all appear to be working toward the two countries not controlled by the suspected owner of the 5. If you look at england's opening in particular, the move to Clyde seems odd.
18 replies
Open
lazysummer8484 (0 DX)
27 Oct 08 UTC
Quick question
Suppose you have a fleet in the Mid-Alantic and another fleet down in Spain's south coast.... is it still possible to support hold each other ?
8 replies
Open
TheGhostmaker (1545 D)
27 Oct 08 UTC
@ mac
Can you send me an email if you want to play in the league still? There may be a place forming in League A

Thank you
7 replies
Open
spyman (424 D(G))
25 Oct 08 UTC
Metagamers
So what are we supposed to do about them. Do we name and shame them?
40 replies
Open
Churchill (2280 D)
27 Oct 08 UTC
Rescuable Game
The game is paused, so no-one starts in a CD position.
It is a high buy-in, but as the points are added to the pot, you stand to make a significant profit.

2 replies
Open
GodofWar (100 D)
25 Oct 08 UTC
End of Game Etiquette...
A purely hypothetical question: Is it against the point of the Diplomacy game to be gracious to someone who is about to get defeated from a game in what is obviously the last moves?
8 replies
Open
EmperorPalpatine (380 D)
26 Oct 08 UTC
Any proud gay players in the house?
=)

Yay to diversity!
124 replies
Open
trim101 (363 D)
24 Oct 08 UTC
please can i be france again!
even england would do!
46 replies
Open
whalen (373 D)
27 Oct 08 UTC
Account change notice....
This is just a quick notice that I'm planning on killing my yahoo mail account. This means that I would like to open a new account on this site using a different email/password. I will not be joining any single game with both accounts and I plan to let the games on my yahoo associated account wind down before I switch.
4 replies
Open
Maniac (189 D(B))
26 Oct 08 UTC
Top 20 countries based on....
Top 20 countries based on how long they have lived peacefully without going to war.
32 replies
Open
Sicarius (673 D)
06 Oct 08 UTC
Dow jones fell 500
below the 10,000 mark now.

229 replies
Open
EdiBirsan (1469 D(B))
27 Oct 08 UTC
Stand By/Baby sitting/how does it work here?
If a player is going to be out of net reach for a vacation or some illness, how does the stand by/temporary player work here?
3 replies
Open
Is this racist?
I think it's just for a laugh:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhXaFUlTwm0&NR=1
1 reply
Open
Acheron (100 D)
27 Oct 08 UTC
Quickie for Practice
Just opened a new game (12 hour rounds) for some more practice:
http://phpdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=6406
1 reply
Open
Page 159 of 1419
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top