I've been told not to give too much away on my methodology, but since asked, and I'm still almost all methodology....e.m.c^42 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 29, 2019 3:09 amKalel, if you're still around, are you willing to provide more context behind your thoughts? For example, it's all and well to state "+1" for good participation or "-1" for noise or changing votes.
But that's near useless to many of us, unfortunately
As much as I'd like to profess mind reading capabilities, or extreme empathy and deduction skills, those are both lacking on my part. We can make all the assumptions we want, but that's all they are, in terms of "What do you think?". I'm no shining paragon in this regard either lol
Like, what do you mean by "good participation"? Why is it "good", compared to "bad". Why is something "intelligent". Is it due to considering a new point that is more likely to be town-motivated than scum? Is it due to bringing an incisive look to a loud and messy situation? And why do you consider it to be "-" or "+"?
Perhaps am just being slow on uptakes here, but really would appreciate it if you could elaborate :D
(Bungo I'm still typing up thoughts on xorx lmao, a lil' bit more time)
The 'Intelligent' part is very much still subjective depending on if I think they're actually making a point and/or challenging a preexisting point. If the post is vague, or a 'na na' post, or just a contradiction I view it negatively. Some of my judgement is just based on how much thought and work it looks like they put into it since I'm never sure if they're right or not.
I still maintain a bias against volume posters that aren't making points, or people that switch their votes around a lot... I think if you're giving input it should be worth opening your mouth (so to speak) for... this is the primary thing that turned me around on ND even before Chaq withdrew. At least his posts were consolidated making them easy to digest, and understand his perspective.
The other thing that's hard to quantify is the relationship piece. For example moving/starting a 2nd/3rd wagon with a weak justification seems like trying to save someone, but can only be weighted in hind-site.
The big add I've started considering this game is past metas. This is why I'm so confused on Bunny... he started off completely different than in the past, but changed 'upon request'. I give him a break on the volume because I find his posts so helpful.
I hope that helps. In both other games I was scumread at at least one point, so I'm pretty used to it, but I'd like to get past just re posting a synopsis and really get into some detective work like the rest of you do.