I wonder who do you think has 'real knowledge' on the subject. I simply was not prioritizing reading a hamas declaration, but you know what, I might end up reading it just out of curiosity (probably it won't happen in the next couple of days though).Quite honestly, that's rather lazy. If you are going to make claims like "Hamas is in favor of a two state solution," at least know what you are talking about. It's not a long read, and to me it just demonstrates your lack of real knowledge on the subject. It is very clear about the fact that Hamas does not want a two state solution, so whoever reported that it is ambiguous, again, lied to you.
And I guess you think it was a ethically a correct thing by Churchill (especially when I hope we can agree that it was totally false that 'all germans were nazis')? And you say "all germans are nazis" was propaganda but sure "all palestinians are hamas" isn't?Churchill said that all Germans are Nazis in WW2, and used that as a propaganda tactic. This dehumanized the Germans and made the public more supportive of the war.
The Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said Israel is "fighting human animals" and "Gaza won’t return to what it was before. We willThere have been war crimes, yes, but other than Netanyahu, you haven't shown how the people or military (by which I mean the soldiers themselves) are genocidal, which is what it takes to cause genocide.
eliminate everything . . . we will reach all places." (and he was not the only one talking about "human animals")
Heritage Minister, Amichai Eliyahu, said that Israel "must find ways for Gazans that are more painful than death"
The Minister of National Security, Itamar Ben-Gvir, "when we say that Hamas should be destroyed, it also means those who celebrate, those who
support, and those who hand out candy - they’re all terrorists, and they should also be destroyed"
No guys, unfortunately, it's not just Netanyahu.
they have informed the Gazans to evacuate areas before bombing them
and later they bombed some of the places where they said people they could refuge
Ok, I appretiate your inputs about this. Here I'll just say I disagree, I think they are very different things conceptually.Conceptually, they are both just as evil as each other.
It's a bit ironic you say that when before you seemed to argue that Hamas does not want a two state solution and that seemed to be the reason you gave to label them genocidal.I personally don't think a two state solution is feasible
Ok, so you really think this is a good argument.And anyways, you entirely disregarded my point that regardless of "who was there first," Israel is doing a much better job governing the land than the Palestinians ever have.
First I want to say that one of the reasons palestinians originally supported hamas, was because the other party, the ANP was percieved as very corrupt and that it was not really making anything to improve their lives.
Anyway, which criteria are you considering to talk about "good government"? and, are you considering at all the context in which side has been governing?
Then, the spaniards would say "see, we are better governors than the american natives", and man, you could perfectly agree with them since while spaniards had a lot of material advantages, plus they would not sacrifice other human beings, nor keep the state of war that seemed prevalent before their arrival (talking about the situation in Mexico and Peru). And so you had spaniards putting natives under a system very similar to slavery and they ended up being so bad governors in Mexico at least, that in 300 years the population never recovered.
I'll finish with this, because this is the string of words where I definitely disagree the most with you. What, for the sake of what you most love, what do you mean by "win" here? This is not a game. The way things are evolving THERE IS NO WIN HERE, for no one.One side has to win