MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

If you have a game you want to play on the forum, you can do so here.
Forum rules
This is an area for forum games. Please note that to support mafia games players cannot edit their own posts in this forum. Off Topic threads will be relocated or deleted. Issues taking place in forum games should be dealt with by respective game GMs and escalated to the moderators only if absolutely necessary.
Message
Author
xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#861 Post by xorxes » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:58 pm

I think it's kind of funny that only 4 people have claimed VT when there are five true VTs. Vecna is probably VT then.

goldfinger0303
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 1669
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 3:17 pm
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#862 Post by goldfinger0303 » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:58 pm

Well, congratulations everyone, the scenario that seemed blaringly obvious happened. Now scum know who our PRs are, while we don't have a damn clue. Scum will now successfully hit PRs tonight while we are forced to potentially mislynch one of our own PRs. This is why the massclaim was stupid.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 13710
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#863 Post by Chaqa » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:58 pm

ND wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 4:32 pm
Then he wants the vig to shoot the one guy literally calling him out for his scam.

If you don't see how all of that is scum motivated then please never play this game again.
The fact you think xorxes is not the Captain is really hilarious.

If another Captain existed they would have nipped this in the bud a year ago.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 13710
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#864 Post by Chaqa » Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:59 pm

Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 4:37 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 4:37 pm
As for gunshots.... I wouldn't shoot ND at this point.

If Xorxes refuses to confirm himself he may earn himself a bullet. Heh, heh.
If someone shoots xorxes they are the worst player of all time
Sounds like something vig!Jamiet would do (love you Jamie)

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 13710
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#865 Post by Chaqa » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:00 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 4:43 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 4:41 pm
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 4:37 pm


If someone shoots xorxes they are the worst player of all time
Not now, but if we reach the end of day and he refuses to confirm himself.
I probably won't reveal today. There's no need to, and the reveal is more useful later.
...

##Vote xorxes

I don’t think you’re scum, and I do think you’re Captain, but you need to put up or shut up dude

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#866 Post by xorxes » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:00 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:56 pm
BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:53 pm
xorxes wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:50 pm


:lol: Only if the GM verifies all the claimants.
True. Odds Xorxes reveals of gets lynched today are near 100%
Agreed with Jamie. Xorxes controls my vote. And as lynching the captain is anti-town: I sure hope he reveals sooner rather than later if he can. I’m off to go sledding! Hope I’m back by EOD.
So you are much more interested in me revealing than in actually catching scum, I see.

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 13710
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#867 Post by Chaqa » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:01 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:11 pm
peterlund wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:07 pm
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 4:37 pm


If someone shoots xorxes they are the worst player of all time
Agree! No need to shoot xorx, as we are about to lynch him!!

But your behaviour Tom is getting more and more suspicious. Buddying the guy that refuses to let the GM confirm his claim. Scumpoints earned there Tom.
Why do you think it is so important to have xorxes confirm his claim immediately? Don't you think the real Captain would counterclaim at some point?
I do, but there’s a lot of players being obstinate about it and it would shut up ND and others

bozotheclown
Posts: 12913
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#868 Post by bozotheclown » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:01 pm

rdrivera2005 wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:47 pm
With 11 PR claims we will need to make some calculations to decide the best point to make a full massclaim, but I guess it will depend on lynches/NKs.
damo666 wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:49 pm
##vote Flav

Voting xorxes is plain daft
Chaqa wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:57 pm
Jamiet99uk wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 4:24 pm
So there are 10 town PR if the Twins count as PRs, and 5 VTs including the backups.

So far 8 PR claims and 4 VT claims. This will soon reach the point where it would become useful. Now that we're this far, I urge others to claim.
Agreed. We’ve reached critical mass - any holdouts now are clearly anti-town.

@xorx - you should reveal. It’s time.
I suggest you help consolidate the non-claimer vote and vote for peterlund.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#869 Post by xorxes » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:03 pm

goldfinger0303 wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:58 pm
Well, congratulations everyone, the scenario that seemed blaringly obvious happened. Now scum know who our PRs are, while we don't have a damn clue. Scum will now successfully hit PRs tonight while we are forced to potentially mislynch one of our own PRs. This is why the massclaim was stupid.
We're not lynching a PR claimant today, don't be silly. There's many more scum in the other group.

bozotheclown
Posts: 12913
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:13 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#870 Post by bozotheclown » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:04 pm

goldfinger0303 wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:58 pm
Well, congratulations everyone, the scenario that seemed blaringly obvious happened. Now scum know who our PRs are, while we don't have a damn clue. Scum will now successfully hit PRs tonight while we are forced to potentially mislynch one of our own PRs. This is why the massclaim was stupid.
We have considerable increased our chances of lynching scum today, as long as players stop voting for players claiming PR.

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#871 Post by xorxes » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:05 pm

Chaqa wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:01 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:11 pm
peterlund wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:07 pm


Agree! No need to shoot xorx, as we are about to lynch him!!

But your behaviour Tom is getting more and more suspicious. Buddying the guy that refuses to let the GM confirm his claim. Scumpoints earned there Tom.
Why do you think it is so important to have xorxes confirm his claim immediately? Don't you think the real Captain would counterclaim at some point?
I do, but there’s a lot of players being obstinate about it and it would shut up ND and others
Why do you want to shut up high potential scum candidates?

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#872 Post by xorxes » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:08 pm

Is Superstition going to be replaced as well?

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 11876
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#873 Post by worcej » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:09 pm

bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:09 pm
teacon7 wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:00 pm
Xorxes I think you're town. I also think you're not playing pro town, in that you're refusing to get verified. Creating this mistrust differential is not pro town. What more do you expect to get from reactions?
Five players have reacted in an anti-town way by voting for an uncced PR instead of someone likely to be scum.
Or we think that the person claiming a town PR and choosing to not use the GM reveal is a little suspicious. I see no good reason to not verify his claim if I am supposed to act as if it is 100% true.

User avatar
worcej
Posts: 11876
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:39 am
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#874 Post by worcej » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:11 pm

BunnyGo wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:43 pm
worcej wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 3:13 pm
Temasek22 wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 12:12 am


If the actual captain is out there, do you think it is in his best interests to claim?
Beginning a lot of catchup now. Also, HNY.

If xorxes is lying, no they shouldn't. They have strong vote powers that are needed to prevent mylo/lylo if they last that long. This is one reason why I think xorxes claiming early is a little off, but NAI overall because he knows he usually dies early.
What is HNY?
Happy New Year...

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#875 Post by xorxes » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:12 pm

worcej wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:09 pm
bozotheclown wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:09 pm
teacon7 wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 5:00 pm
Xorxes I think you're town. I also think you're not playing pro town, in that you're refusing to get verified. Creating this mistrust differential is not pro town. What more do you expect to get from reactions?
Five players have reacted in an anti-town way by voting for an uncced PR instead of someone likely to be scum.
Or we think that the person claiming a town PR and choosing to not use the GM reveal is a little suspicious. I see no good reason to not verify his claim if I am supposed to act as if it is 100% true.
You're not supposed to act as if it's 100% true. You are supposed to weigh the chances it is true vs the chances it is false. You are supposed to treat it a you would treat any unverified but uncced PR claim. It is in fact the only claim that could be counterclaimed at this point, and yet has not been counterclaimed.

ND
Posts: 3187
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:49 pm
Location: America
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#876 Post by ND » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:12 pm

I have no clue what that moron Chaqa is talking about. But, yeah vote xorxes he is high probable scum.

He can end this at any time by verifying. The fact that he hasn't yet means it is very likley he is not captain. If he was the captain he would have just had the GM to verify his role and then started the whole mass claim plan.

peterlund
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 1045
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:52 pm
Location: Sverige
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#877 Post by peterlund » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:16 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:47 pm
Excellent. So we know (at least) one PR claimant is lying (Kalel or Bunny are my top candidates). We can sort them out later.

If any of Flav/ND/peterlund/Superstition wants to claim PR they should do it now. Otherwise they are letting scum get away with a fake PR claim for no reason.

If they don't claim PR, we can assume they are claiming VT (which is kind of interesting, given that peterlund implied he was a PR).

##VOTE peterlund then.
What has happen now? Am I getting too disturbing to you now, saying too much that hurts your silly case? Before you seemed to townread me a bit and now suddenly you vote for me? Why this radical change suddenly?

And I note that your gang mates Tom and Bozo buddy you 100%, interesting!

User avatar
Chaqa
Bronze Donator
Bronze Donator
Posts: 13710
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:33 pm
Location: Allentown, PA, USA
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#878 Post by Chaqa » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:17 pm

Tom Bombadil wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:04 pm
I guess what I'm getting at is that massclaim makes sense regardless of xorxes role, so people connecting the two don't make sense to me.
I agree - but I also think xorxes claiming is just better for us at this point so the question isn’t lingering

xorxes
Posts: 7835
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 9:45 am
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#879 Post by xorxes » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:18 pm

peterlund wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:16 pm
xorxes wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:47 pm
Excellent. So we know (at least) one PR claimant is lying (Kalel or Bunny are my top candidates). We can sort them out later.

If any of Flav/ND/peterlund/Superstition wants to claim PR they should do it now. Otherwise they are letting scum get away with a fake PR claim for no reason.

If they don't claim PR, we can assume they are claiming VT (which is kind of interesting, given that peterlund implied he was a PR).

##VOTE peterlund then.
What has happen now? Am I getting too disturbing to you now, saying too much that hurts your silly case? Before you seemed to townread me a bit and now suddenly you vote for me? Why this radical change suddenly?

And I note that your gang mates Tom and Bozo buddy you 100%, interesting!
I was townreading you because you had implied you were PR, but now we have 11 PR claims, so unless you want to be the 12th claimant, you were probably lying.

peterlund
Gold Donator
Gold Donator
Posts: 1045
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:52 pm
Location: Sverige
Contact:

Re: MAFIA 52: You Can't Take The Sky From Me [HIDDEN]

#880 Post by peterlund » Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:21 pm

xorxes wrote:
Wed Jan 01, 2020 7:18 pm
I was townreading you because you had implied you were PR, but now we have 11 PR claims, so unless you want to be the 12th claimant, you were probably lying.
If that would be the case, that I would claim, why would the probability be higher that the last claimant would be lying compared to any of the first 11 claimants?

Post Reply